Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.programming > #245
| From | "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Is binary a "language"? |
| Date | 2011-04-17 02:30 +0200 |
| Organization | Informatimago |
| Message-ID | <87vcydn2h8.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <90j6tbFlrfU1@mid.individual.net> <87lizfcy54.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <29fc0345-1b7b-4e11-bcfe-bde8adebae93@v33g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <87sjtj8m45.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <e49e60f9-d9a4-49fa-8c6c-92d1d5471f8c@z7g2000prh.googlegroups.com> |
spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> writes:
>> So we'll have to fall back to the Russians's Сетунь for the development
>> of a ternary, 3-state electronic tubes-based computer.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Setunhttp://www.computer-museum.ru/english/setun.htm
>
> Perhaps the Russians thought a tristable device was Marxist. You know,
> thesis, antithesis and synthesis being the tristable dialectic.
They definitely did this as an anti-capitalist move.
But then, their IBM-cloning industry got successful. :-)
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-12 05:57 -0700
Re: Is binary a "language"? "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-04-12 16:33 +0200
Re: Is binary a "language"? "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-04-12 09:46 -0500
Re: Is binary a "language"? "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-04-12 17:00 +0200
Re: Is binary a "language"? "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-04-12 10:11 -0500
Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 06:07 -0700
Re: Is binary a "language"? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-04-15 14:40 +0100
Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 06:58 -0700
Re: Is binary a "language"? "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-04-15 19:23 +0200
Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 07:19 -0700
Re: Is binary a "language"? "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-04-17 02:30 +0200
Re: Is binary a "language"? Thad Smith <ThadSmith@acm.org> - 2011-04-24 15:37 -0700
Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 06:01 -0700
Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 05:40 -0700
Re: Is binary a "language"? "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-04-15 19:12 +0200
Re: Is binary a "language"? spinoza1111 <spinoza1111@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 07:15 -0700
csiph-web