Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1565

Re: Intel SCC 48-core x86 Processor

From "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.programming.threads, comp.programming
Subject Re: Intel SCC 48-core x86 Processor
Date 2013-06-19 17:58 -0700
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <kptk4l$i2f$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <kptfbn$cco$1@dont-email.me> <kptjeo$tkt$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


"aminer"  wrote in message news:kptjeo$tkt$1@dont-email.me...

> Hello,

> I have read the following paper:

> http://mcg.cs.tau.ac.il/papers/ppopp2013-rwlocks.pdf

> So as you have noticed they are using the same method that are using
> the Distributed RWLock by Dmitry Vyukov, so we have to change the
> "function GetCurrentProcessorNumber:long;" inside MSync library by 
> function that returns the current NUMA number, by doing this we will
> reduce coherence traffic and the distributed RWLock will be NUMA aware. 
> And that's easy to do.

Distribution aside for a moment...

Take a look at Dmitry Vyukov asymmetric rwmutex algorithm:

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!original/comp.programming.threads/t9O4wI-co8Y/CIy9UAQ0rHoJ

This really kicks some serious as$! 

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Intel SCC 48-core x86 Processor "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2013-06-19 17:58 -0700
  Re: Intel SCC 48-core x86 Processor "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2013-06-19 18:57 -0700

csiph-web