Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1452
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming, comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: About Parallel archiver... |
| Date | 2013-04-12 07:05 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kk8pk3$dfi$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <kk7db3$59e$2@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello, I have redone the tests, and used solid compression like with the tar.ppm or tar.bz2 format and i have found that my Parallel archiver and with with maximum level compression that is clPPMUltra it compresses 14% better than WinRar (with maximum level) and 4% less than 7Zip (with maximum level compression that is LZMA2 Ultra) and it is muh more better than WinZip on compression ratio . How to use solid compression with my Parallel archiver ? Just archive your files with clPPMNone and after that compress your archive with clPPMUltra, Parallel archiver will then compress 14% better than WinRar (with maximum level compression) and 4% less than 7Zip (with maximum level compression that is LZMA2 Ultra) . Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
About Parallel archiver... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-04-11 18:29 -0700 Re: About Parallel archiver... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-04-12 07:05 -0700
csiph-web