Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.msdos.programmer > #180
| From | Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201109.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.msdos.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Best DOS assembler? |
| References | <j3ojil$72q$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca> |
| Message-ID | <810d9e4b3d0e66423b1623a1d8f99db0@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> (permalink) |
| Date | 2011-09-02 07:11 +0200 |
| Organization | Frell Anonymous Remailer |
> monahanz <monahan@vitasoft.org> wrote: > >Thanks Ross, Before I jump into this perhaps you could give me some > >pointers. > >Is there a "step by step" writeup somewhere that describes how to > >configure Visual Studio 2008 to run ml.exe. Yes, have a look on Kip Irvine's pages. I think it's kipirvine.com but if not you should be able to find it with a quick websearch. Lots of good tools on that site. Hard to navigate but lots of good stuff. > >I will look for Link as well. Question, will it work with W7 (64bit). > >Do I have to use a CMD.exe box or can it also sit within VS2008. > > Most versions of Microsoft's linker you can find today aren't able to > create MS-DOS executables, and most of the old versions of link than > can are 16-bit applications that won't work 64-bit versions of Windows. > One of the versions of link (there a number of them) included in the > Windows XP DDK is a 32-bit application that can create MS-DOS executables > on 64-bit Windows. You should be able to use it somehow with Visual > Studio as an external program, but I'm not sure that feature is included > in the free Express version. You should get a 32/64 bit linker with VS and the other ones are available on downloads.microsoft.com. Also see japheth.de for some links to linkers
Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Best DOS assembler? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2011-08-15 15:37 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2011-08-19 12:49 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2011-08-19 07:40 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-08-19 19:14 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2011-08-21 01:03 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? ak621@chebucto.ns.ca (Richard Bonner) - 2011-08-30 13:27 +0000
Re: Best DOS assembler? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201108.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2011-08-31 05:25 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? ak621@chebucto.ns.ca (Richard Bonner) - 2011-09-04 13:00 +0000
Re: Best DOS assembler? James Harris <james.harris.1@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-03 13:09 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-09-04 06:44 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201109.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2011-09-05 02:44 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2011-08-24 01:06 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? monahanz <monahan@vitasoft.org> - 2011-09-01 00:20 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-09-01 12:24 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? monahanz <monahan@vitasoft.org> - 2011-09-01 10:41 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-09-01 14:40 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201109.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2011-09-02 07:11 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-09-02 11:09 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201109.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2011-09-05 02:06 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-09-05 14:57 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201109.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2011-09-06 03:01 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-09-06 10:28 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2011-09-08 06:37 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-09-09 11:47 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201109.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2011-09-10 23:19 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-09-10 20:09 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2011-09-11 10:48 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-09-11 12:18 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201109.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2011-09-12 01:31 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-09-12 11:30 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? ak621@chebucto.ns.ca (Richard Bonner) - 2011-09-04 13:02 +0000
Re: Best DOS assembler? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2011-09-04 10:01 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2011-09-01 22:46 +0200
Re: Best DOS assembler? Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2011-09-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? monahanz <monahan@vitasoft.org> - 2011-09-01 21:56 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2011-09-02 16:19 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2011-09-02 20:23 -0400
Re: Best DOS assembler? "s_dubrovich@yahoo.com" <s_dubrovich@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-03 07:08 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? monahanz <monahan@vitasoft.org> - 2011-09-03 10:12 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2011-09-03 11:42 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? monahanz <monahan@vitasoft.org> - 2011-09-03 22:21 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2011-09-04 22:43 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? "s_dubrovich@yahoo.com" <s_dubrovich@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-03 13:11 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2011-09-04 09:13 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? "s_dubrovich@yahoo.com" <s_dubrovich@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-05 05:37 -0700
Re: Best DOS assembler? ak621@chebucto.ns.ca (Richard Bonner) - 2011-09-17 10:40 +0000
Re: Best DOS assembler? ak621@chebucto.ns.ca (Richard Bonner) - 2011-09-04 13:06 +0000
csiph-web