Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.ms-windows.misc > #777
| From | "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.ms-windows.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-xp, alt.windows7.general, microsoft.public.windowsxp.general |
| Subject | Re: Windows 32-bit |
| Date | 2023-12-31 19:15 +0000 |
| Organization | 255 software |
| Message-ID | <3dz8IOFR3bklFwYY@255soft.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <3fj0pi1he28cfgbul4lbmu4jua526btugq@4ax.com> <$93+An1C1HklFwbp@255soft.uk> <umrm4d$1nhbb$2@dont-email.me> <t+aKQ8$3BWklFwIa@255soft.uk> <ums57t$1pjk8$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
In message <ums57t$1pjk8$1@dont-email.me> at Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:35:08, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> writes >On 12/31/2023 7:37 AM, J. P. Gilliver wrote: > >> Maybe it was 486DX as Tim says. I had _thought_ the '387 was the >>co-processor for that series. >> >> I'm not sure when they started to drop the "80" from (e. g.) 80386. I >>know they started using names around the time of the '586, alias >>Pentium, because someone in charge of the administration of trademarks >>said, basically, no more trademarking just numbers. (It wasn't just >>Intel - other manufacturers had to invent names too; I remember one >>chip called "roboclock"; I think it was Maxim or IDT.) Presumably >>that's why things moved to Pentium II, etc., rather than 686. > >It's possible for a company to continue using its old >numbering scheme, for labeling at chip level. > >Here, the lucky 8 is still in usage, for a part of it. Southbridges. >These chips did not typically need heatsinks, so you could spot >a part number like this on your Pentium 4 motherboard. > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%2FO_Controller_Hub Wow, that's an amazing resource! > > 82801ER (ICH5R) RAID > >******* > >Someone has saved the musty old books. Good on 'em. [] >I used to collect those, early on, but later it did not >align with what I was doing. > >Once the industry became more adept at using PDF, the >fascination with catalogs disappeared. We actually had >several very large rooms, with all those databooks collected >in them. But that library was too far from me, to be >of any practical use. > >I still have a databook from 1972 here. The sentimental >aspect was, as a kid, I wrote a letter to Fairchild, asking >them if I could have a databook. And they actually sent >me a databook! Surprised the hell out of me. I think it >cost them $4.00 in postage to send that. That was the 7400 >series of TTL or so. I still have a few bins of the critters. I used to collect the TTL books - had quite a large collection of them, and knowledge of the numbering too. I only got round to throwing them out about a year ago - I kept the earliest, as I'd actually bought it (most of the others I'd got from work, either "acquired" or rescued when being thrown out), and _one or two_ others (and wallcharts). >A number of the companies from that era, did not survive. >Texas Instruments is still around. Initially I associate it with National (Semiconductor) - blue books, and Texas Instruments (yellow or orange). Mullard the 11000 (centre power) series, IDT the clever ones and also low-power-but-still-fast ACT competitors to CMOS 4000 (which use a _lot_ less power and could be run on a wide range of voltages, but weren't much for speed). Ah, happy times ... oh, and - I forget who did them - somebody did single gates, so you didn't have to have the four (etc.) you got in a 7400. > > Paul John -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Can a blue man sing the whites?
Back to comp.os.ms-windows.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Windows 32-bit Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2023-11-17 15:02 +0200
Re: Windows 32-bit Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2023-11-17 14:06 +0100
Re: Windows 32-bit Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2023-11-17 11:37 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-11-17 18:04 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-11-18 19:28 +1100
Re: Windows 32-bit John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2023-11-18 10:13 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-11-18 22:49 +1100
Re: Windows 32-bit Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2023-11-18 13:28 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2023-11-19 08:55 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-11-19 23:01 +1100
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-11-19 12:58 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2023-11-19 10:44 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 11:32 -0800
Re: Windows 32-bit John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2023-11-19 21:38 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-11-20 20:40 +1100
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-11-20 10:07 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-11-21 00:26 +1100
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-11-20 14:11 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-11-21 20:20 +1100
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-11-21 10:08 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-11-21 23:15 +1100
Re: Windows 32-bit John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2023-11-20 18:23 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2023-11-20 23:00 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-11-21 10:12 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2023-11-21 20:59 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-11-22 05:02 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2023-11-22 02:38 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2023-11-22 10:11 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2023-11-22 23:08 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-11-22 10:28 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-11-22 10:12 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-11-21 20:22 +1100
Re: Windows 32-bit Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2023-11-20 14:45 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2023-11-18 11:37 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit Zaidy036 <Zaidy036@air.isp.spam> - 2023-11-18 15:00 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2023-11-18 20:38 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2023-11-19 08:57 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-11-19 20:00 +1100
Re: Windows 32-bit Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2023-11-19 10:47 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-11-18 13:10 -0800
Re: Windows 32-bit John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2023-11-19 09:00 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 13:45 -0800
Re: Windows 32-bit John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2023-11-20 08:46 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2023-11-19 06:12 +0200
Re: Windows 32-bit Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2023-11-19 10:54 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-11-17 13:36 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit GlowingBlueMist <zapbot@truely.invalid> - 2023-11-17 09:05 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2023-11-19 06:43 +0200
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-11-19 11:28 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2023-11-17 16:16 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2023-11-19 07:01 +0200
Re: Windows 32-bit Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2023-11-19 19:34 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2023-12-29 09:49 +0200
Re: Windows 32-bit Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2023-12-29 15:27 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-12-29 19:07 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2023-12-29 19:56 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Tim Slattery <TimSlattery@utexas.edu> - 2023-12-30 12:10 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-12-30 20:27 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-12-30 23:14 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-12-31 05:12 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-12-31 23:17 +1100
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-12-31 12:37 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-12-31 11:35 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-12-31 19:15 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2023-12-31 14:43 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-01-01 11:25 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-01-01 21:04 +1100
Re: Windows 32-bit Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2023-12-31 14:39 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-12-31 22:11 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit Tim Slattery <TimSlattery@utexas.edu> - 2023-12-29 11:31 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2024-01-02 13:22 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@-.invalid> - 2023-11-18 06:56 +1300
Re: Windows 32-bit Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2023-11-19 07:07 +0200
Re: Windows 32-bit Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@-.invalid> - 2023-11-19 21:07 +1300
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-11-19 13:52 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2023-12-29 09:54 +0200
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-11-18 06:53 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2023-11-19 07:41 +0200
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-11-19 03:17 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2023-11-19 16:57 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-11-19 13:57 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-11-19 14:21 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2023-11-19 21:22 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-11-19 17:56 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2023-11-19 23:59 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2023-11-20 12:45 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2023-11-20 15:19 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2024-06-07 00:39 +0100
Re: Windows 32-bit "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2024-06-07 14:50 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-06-07 11:33 -0400
Re: Windows 32-bit Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2024-06-07 16:50 +0100
Re: Windows 32-bit "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2024-06-08 16:34 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2024-06-08 18:09 +0100
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-06-09 19:03 -0400
Re: Windows 32-bit "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2024-06-11 06:16 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2023-12-29 09:59 +0200
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-11-19 13:32 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2023-11-19 13:59 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2023-12-29 10:07 +0200
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-12-29 04:21 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-12-29 11:56 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2023-12-29 12:26 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-12-29 22:38 -0500
Re: Windows 32-bit "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2023-12-30 08:30 +0000
Re: Windows 32-bit Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2023-12-30 15:26 -0600
Re: Windows 32-bit Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2024-01-04 17:48 +0200
csiph-web