Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.security > #46
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.tota-refugium.de!.POSTED!liesleafnode.muth.de!news |
|---|---|
| From | Rolf Muth <rolf.muth@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.mail.sendmail, comp.os.linux.security |
| Subject | Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? |
| Followup-To | comp.os.linux.security |
| Date | Fri, 09 Sep 2011 06:45:19 +0200 |
| Organization | TOTA |
| Lines | 38 |
| Message-ID | <v7ioj8-geb.ln1@liesleafnode.muth.de> (permalink) |
| References | <386c1ef5-2d8f-446d-8a7c-e0ecbfe7feab@z18g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <slrnj6ii45.h5r.unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-Trace | tota-refugium.de 1315543700 31460 eJwFwYEBwDAEBMCVfHhhHFX2HyF3VIf3Nacbl4v8ZygGUtROYzTqxKjQP+gs1is7dlLq4D4J5xCY (9 Sep 2011 04:48:20 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.tota-refugium.de |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 9 Sep 2011 04:48:20 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | KNode/0.10.1 |
| X-User-ID | eJwNxMEBwCAIA8CVQEKw4wjI/iPYe5wblRWgEz4+bfp3TxcaxZXIkcWdKaIfNWxg9JizJa75AysWEPk= |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:38jyoEQnA1hAk7liX/1pSmmm0ak= |
| X-NNTP-Posting-Host | eJwNx8kBAzEIA8CWuCRMOWYN/ZeQzG/gVH4ZBAOLTbhz3v+jZTfUXrxYc8II3Q4mjtSgR3lvNI5XixzpeV9SLE2rrkPB3B+O9hhJ |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.mail.sendmail:544 comp.os.linux.security:46 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.security
Show key headers only | View raw
unruh wrote: > On 2011-09-08, moreno_news@mailinator.com <moreno_news@mailinator.com> > wrote: >> ... >> Would you believe me if I told you that the same thing happened even >> though the sender DID use BCC?? That is, that you receive an e-mail >> where your address appears along with 40 or 50 others in the headers, >> even though the sender DID use blind-carbon-copy for all those 40 or >> 50 addresses? >> >> And if you do believe me, would you care to venture a guess as to >> which piece of software would be capable of doing something that >> unbelievably stupid? >> >> (Hint: the list of BCC'd addresses appears in a custom header >> X-MS-ExchangeCrossPremises-BCC) Maybe its a problem of the mailer. > I have searched my inbox and find none with that header. I often send mail with a bcc to one of my mailadresses (kmail and postfix), the bcc is in the outbox only, but never in the received mail. -- Herzliche Grüße! Rolf Muth Meine Adressen duerfen nicht fuer Werbung verwendet werden! PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF8DC41935544C89A
Back to comp.os.linux.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? moreno_news@mailinator.com - 2011-09-08 13:01 -0700
Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-09-08 22:58 +0000
Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? moreno_news@mailinator.com - 2011-09-08 16:37 -0700
Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? Rolf Muth <rolf.muth@web.de> - 2011-09-09 06:45 +0200
Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? moreno_news@mailinator.com - 2011-09-09 07:37 -0700
Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? jason123 <nospam_aqie4203@live.cn.invalid> - 2011-09-19 05:11 -0500
csiph-web