Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.security > #46

Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind??

From Rolf Muth <rolf.muth@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.mail.sendmail, comp.os.linux.security
Subject Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind??
Followup-To comp.os.linux.security
Date 2011-09-09 06:45 +0200
Organization TOTA
Message-ID <v7ioj8-geb.ln1@liesleafnode.muth.de> (permalink)
References <386c1ef5-2d8f-446d-8a7c-e0ecbfe7feab@z18g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <slrnj6ii45.h5r.unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.security

Show all headers | View raw


unruh wrote:

> On 2011-09-08, moreno_news@mailinator.com <moreno_news@mailinator.com>
> wrote:
>> ...
>> Would you believe me if I told you that the same thing happened even
>> though the sender DID use BCC??  That is, that you receive an e-mail
>> where your address appears along with 40 or 50 others in the headers,
>> even though the sender DID use blind-carbon-copy for all those 40 or
>> 50 addresses?
>>
>> And if you do believe me, would you care to venture a guess as to
>> which piece of software would be capable of doing something that
>> unbelievably stupid?
>>
>> (Hint:  the list of BCC'd addresses appears in a custom header
>> X-MS-ExchangeCrossPremises-BCC)

Maybe its a problem of the mailer.

> I have searched my inbox and find none with that header.

I often send mail with a bcc to one of my mailadresses (kmail and postfix),
the bcc is in the outbox only, but never in the received mail.

-- 
Herzliche Grüße!
Rolf Muth
Meine Adressen duerfen nicht fuer Werbung verwendet werden! 
PGP Public Key:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF8DC41935544C89A

Back to comp.os.linux.security | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? moreno_news@mailinator.com - 2011-09-08 13:01 -0700
  Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-09-08 22:58 +0000
    Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? moreno_news@mailinator.com - 2011-09-08 16:37 -0700
    Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? Rolf Muth <rolf.muth@web.de> - 2011-09-09 06:45 +0200
      Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? moreno_news@mailinator.com - 2011-09-09 07:37 -0700
        Re: Blind carbon-copies not so blind?? jason123 <nospam_aqie4203@live.cn.invalid> - 2011-09-19 05:11 -0500

csiph-web