Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.security > #348
| From | buck <buck@private.mil> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.security |
| Subject | Re: Allow new incoming connection? |
| Date | 2013-06-22 06:46 +0000 |
| Organization | Say What? |
| Message-ID | <kq3h7p12jcm@news4.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <kq261g07eh@news1.newsguy.com> <kq266k$3au$1@dont-email.me> |
Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> wrote in news:kq266k$3au$1@dont- email.me: >> Is my rejection of NEW on high ports wrong? > > In my opinion: yes. > >> Should I allow just google? What is best practice (and why?)? > > The thing most newcomers to GNU/Linux always tend to misunderstand is > firewalls, and especially so when they come from the Microsoft Windows > world. > > Windows listens to just about every port - high or low - by default, and > thus it needs a userspace firewall to stop things from coming in and > things from phoning home. GNU/Linux is not like that. If you don't > have any daemons or applications listening on a particular port, then > all traffic to that port will be ignored by default. By consequence, > there is no need to add a rule to your firewall - which is the Linux > kernel itself, by the way - for traffic you don't want. > > You're not in Redmond anymore, Toto. ;-) ??? See http://andthatsjazz.org/customfw.html and then maybe you can make such comments. -- buck
Back to comp.os.linux.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Allow new incoming connection? buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-06-21 18:29 +0000
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-06-21 20:36 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-06-22 06:46 +0000
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-06-22 08:53 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-06-22 14:47 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-06-22 15:09 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-06-22 14:27 +0100
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-06-22 16:37 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-06-21 20:01 +0100
Re: Allow new incoming connection? buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-06-22 06:35 +0000
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-06-22 09:39 +0100
Re: Allow new incoming connection? David Hough <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2013-06-22 12:18 +0100
Re: Allow new incoming connection? "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2013-06-22 07:37 -0500
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-06-22 14:56 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-06-22 17:35 +0000
Re: Allow new incoming connection? buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-06-22 18:01 +0000
Re: Allow new incoming connection? "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2013-06-22 14:29 -0500
csiph-web