Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.security > #344
| From | buck <buck@private.mil> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.security |
| Subject | Allow new incoming connection? |
| Date | 2013-06-21 18:29 +0000 |
| Organization | Say What? |
| Message-ID | <kq261g07eh@news1.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
I recently acquired a B&N Nook, which has caused me to raise these questions. First, a definition: Ports greater than 1024 are "unreserved" or "high" ports. My firewall is configured to allow ESTABLISHED and RELATED tcp connections where both source and destination ports are high, but it rejects NEW unless these are specifically allowed. For example, I allow incoming VNC on --dport 5900 to one computer and 6502 (for a program similar to VNC called NetOp) on another. The Nook is going nuts because it is being prevented from establishing NEW connections from google (74.125.142.0/24) on high ports. Is my rejection of NEW on high ports wrong? Should I allow just google? What is best practice (and why?)? -- buck
Back to comp.os.linux.security | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Allow new incoming connection? buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-06-21 18:29 +0000
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-06-21 20:36 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-06-22 06:46 +0000
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-06-22 08:53 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-06-22 14:47 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2013-06-22 15:09 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-06-22 14:27 +0100
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-06-22 16:37 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-06-21 20:01 +0100
Re: Allow new incoming connection? buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-06-22 06:35 +0000
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-06-22 09:39 +0100
Re: Allow new incoming connection? David Hough <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2013-06-22 12:18 +0100
Re: Allow new incoming connection? "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2013-06-22 07:37 -0500
Re: Allow new incoming connection? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-06-22 14:56 +0200
Re: Allow new incoming connection? buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-06-22 17:35 +0000
Re: Allow new incoming connection? buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-06-22 18:01 +0000
Re: Allow new incoming connection? "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2013-06-22 14:29 -0500
csiph-web