Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #87875 > unrolled thread

Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT !

Started byc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
First post2026-06-12 01:49 -0400
Last post2026-06-18 04:28 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 92 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc


Contents

  Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-12 01:49 -0400
    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-06-12 07:54 +0200
      Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-12 02:12 -0400
        Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-06-12 09:03 +0200
          Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-12 03:25 -0400
    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-12 06:22 +0000
      Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-12 03:14 -0400
        Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-12 11:45 +0200
          Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-12 23:21 -0400
            Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-13 04:20 +0000
            Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-14 14:27 +0200
              Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-14 22:51 -0400
                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-15 03:15 +0000
                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-15 01:46 -0400
                    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-15 07:16 +0000
                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-06-15 17:02 +0000
                    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-15 19:05 +0000
                      Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 20:41 +0100
                        Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-15 22:21 +0000
                          Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-16 02:00 +0100
                            Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-16 02:55 +0000
                              Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-16 11:54 +0100
                                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-16 18:00 +0000
                                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-17 10:55 +0100
                                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-16 22:07 -0400
                                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-17 03:51 +0000
                        Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-16 12:34 +0200
                          Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-16 11:55 +0100
                            Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-16 15:14 +0200
                              Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-16 15:10 +0100
                                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-16 18:15 +0000
                                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-16 20:22 +0200
                                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-17 10:58 +0100
                                    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-17 16:47 +0000
                                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-16 22:11 -0400
                                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-17 03:29 +0000
                              Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-16 22:09 -0400
                                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-17 03:19 +0000
                          Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-16 18:09 +0000
                            Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-16 23:23 -0400
                              Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-17 07:20 +0000
                                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-18 04:26 -0400
                                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-18 10:32 +0200
                                    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-18 09:44 +0100
                                      Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-18 13:55 +0200
                                        Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-18 17:02 +0100
                                          Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-18 18:37 +0200
                                            Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-18 19:14 +0100
                                              Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-18 20:50 +0200
                                            Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-18 19:45 +0000
                                              Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-19 00:22 +0200
                                    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-06-18 18:26 +0000
                                    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-18 19:41 +0000
                                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-18 19:39 +0000
                              Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-06-17 19:35 +0000
                                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-18 04:50 -0400
                                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-18 10:25 +0100
                                    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-06-18 18:26 +0000
                                    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-18 19:33 +0000
                          Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-16 21:47 -0400
                            Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-17 03:13 +0000
                            Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-17 10:58 +0100
                            Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-06-17 19:35 +0000
                              Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-18 01:15 +0000
                                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-18 04:42 -0400
                              Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-18 04:49 -0400
                                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-06-18 18:26 +0000
        Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-12 19:32 +0000
      Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-12 11:38 +0200
    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-12 06:27 +0000
      Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-12 03:22 -0400
        Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jmj@energokod.gda.pl> - 2026-06-12 09:53 +0200
          Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-12 19:34 +0000
    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-06-12 11:54 +0200
      Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-12 23:37 -0400
        Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-13 06:42 +0000
          Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-13 04:18 -0400
            Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-13 20:21 +0000
              Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-13 23:09 -0400
                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-14 06:22 +0000
                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-14 03:57 -0400
                    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-14 18:38 +0000
                      Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-15 01:27 -0400
                        Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-15 07:11 +0000
                Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! mechanicjay@sol.smbfc.net (Mechanicjay) - 2026-06-14 07:01 +0000
                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-14 04:14 -0400
                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-06-14 10:56 +0200
                  Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-14 18:40 +0000
                    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-15 01:27 -0400
    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! mechanicjay@sol.smbfc.net (Mechanicjay) - 2026-06-12 13:26 +0000
    Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> - 2026-06-17 15:43 +0800
      Re: Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT ! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-06-18 04:28 -0400

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →


#87875 — Leap-16 ... Oh SHIT !

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-06-12 01:49 -0400
SubjectLeap-16 ... Oh SHIT !
Message-ID<S8adna3ol5hKALb3nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
OK ... OpenSUSE has become just kinda TERRIBLE ... it's
like stepping 25 years back.

The installer won't let you change the disks - BTRFS or
nothing. The desktops offered are KDS (nasty), GNOME
(worse) or an XCFC that will only use Wayland and will
not start properly in VirtualBox (unless you pick an
'invalid' option = 800x600)

AFTER install, theoretically Cinemmon and IceWM are
to be had ... but IF you install them then even the
cheat boot won't work. (if starting from XFCE)

Other software and devel stuff - a VERY short list.

WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED ???

What an EMBARRASSMENT !

Is the "team" down to one old guy with a
"Fallen And Can't Get Up" tag around
his neck ? Shows how much a distro CAN
rot away.

Yea, tried the offline AND online installers.

Hell, even had to install YAST2 using Zypper.
NO software center at all in XFCE. The one
in KDE, "Discovery", only shows maybe ten
percent of the actual software to be had ...
gotta use YAST.

OpenSUSE used to be kinda 'Cadillac'. Used it for
a LONG time - desktops and servers. Now it seems
to intentionally work against your desires - as
shriveled as a 99 year olds testicles.

KDE seems the ONLY quasi-viable environment, and I'm
not fond of KDE.

Really looks like the DebiVerse is the only place
left for a full/easy/decent Linux system. The Arch
universe is 'fair' - but DID have serious hangs in
the update process about a year in.

Oh well, spent FIVE hours fucking with it ... I'll
see what still can, and can't, be done with the
Modern New And Improved OpenSUSE. Can't even find
my Cinnemon install - the KDE login thing doesn't
seem to have any alt desktop selector.

IMHO, if you want RPMs, Fedora. Had serious update
probs with the latest one though - even NOT in a
virtual machine. They know, they can't seem to get
it fixed properly, hangs about a third of the
way through.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#87876

FromMarco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de>
Date2026-06-12 07:54 +0200
Message-ID<110g6uf$1dlem$5@paganini.bofh.team>
In reply to#87875
On 12.06.2026 01:49 c186282 c186282 wrote:

> IMHO, if you want RPMs, Fedora. Had serious update
> probs with the latest one though - even NOT in a
> virtual machine. They know, they can't seem to get
> it fixed properly, hangs about a third of the
> way through.

What was the issue with that?

I also use it and updating it works fine.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87877

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-06-12 02:12 -0400
Message-ID<1NqdnX_-U77wPrb3nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#87876
On 6/12/26 01:54, Marco Moock wrote:
> On 12.06.2026 01:49 c186282 c186282 wrote:
> 
>> IMHO, if you want RPMs, Fedora. Had serious update
>> probs with the latest one though - even NOT in a
>> virtual machine. They know, they can't seem to get
>> it fixed properly, hangs about a third of the
>> way through.
> 
> What was the issue with that?

   The ISSUE is that the usual GUI updater
   DOES NOT WORK.

> I also use it and updating it works fine.

   Well, I installed it native on a couple of
   different boxes, VERY different experience.
   It kinda works ONCE, then ......

   This was the latest version AND a point update
   of that.

   AM using a good wifi link. MIGHT be involved
   somehow. However my whole system is JUST wifi
   at this point, no hardwires coming in from
   a pole anywhere, no wired hubs. This is becoming
   very 'usual'. Providers HATE wires because they
   are EXPENSIVE to maintain.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87885

FromMarco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de>
Date2026-06-12 09:03 +0200
Message-ID<110gb03$1dlem$6@paganini.bofh.team>
In reply to#87877
On 12.06.2026 02:12 c186282 c186282 wrote:

>    The ISSUE is that the usual GUI updater
>    DOES NOT WORK.

Discover?

Works for me. What does not work on your system?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87888

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-06-12 03:25 -0400
Message-ID<1NqdnXr-U773Kbb3nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#87885
On 6/12/26 03:03, Marco Moock wrote:
> On 12.06.2026 02:12 c186282 c186282 wrote:
> 
>>     The ISSUE is that the usual GUI updater
>>     DOES NOT WORK.
> 
> Discover?
> 
> Works for me. What does not work on your system?

   Hmmmmm ... "works" ???

   For fun, search for, say, "COBOL".

   Then try zypper or yast.

   "Myrlyn" - IF you set the search params wide
   enough - can kinda find such stuff ... but
   often TOO much stuff.

   Hey, just did it five minutes ago.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87879

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-06-12 06:22 +0000
Message-ID<n91mtdFjf5pU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#87875
On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:49:42 -0400, c186282 wrote:


> Hell, even had to install YAST2 using Zypper.
> NO software center at all in XFCE. The one in KDE, "Discovery", only
> shows maybe ten percent of the actual software to be had ... gotta use
> YAST.

Did you get a yast2 GUI? 'zypper in yast2' give you choices, one of which 
is to remove busybox-hostname, the other is to install it but some 
dependencies might be missing. I took the goat behind Door 3. It installed 
but it's the ncurses TUI.

> OpenSUSE used to be kinda 'Cadillac'. Used it for a LONG time - desktops
> and servers. Now it seems to intentionally work against your desires -
> as shriveled as a 99 year olds testicles.

Leap 16 is now downstream of SLE with some additional community packages. 
Yast has been replaced by Myrlyn. The Agama installed is a work in 
progress. A common complaint is people assuming it's a linear install like 
most other distros. If you don't select a DE from the menus on the left 
you get the straight server install. "WTF do I do now?"

Supposedly they will make it a little more user friendly. Then there's 
CockPit, which I'm not sure really works on Leap yet. 

If you want to live dangerously go for Tumbleweed or Slowroll. They're 
rolling distros. Even that's a little strange as updating is 'zypper dup' 
so every update is treated like a distro update.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87886

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-06-12 03:14 -0400
Message-ID<1NqdnXj-U76ZL7b3nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#87879
On 6/12/26 02:22, rbowman wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:49:42 -0400, c186282 wrote:
> 
> 
>> Hell, even had to install YAST2 using Zypper.
>> NO software center at all in XFCE. The one in KDE, "Discovery", only
>> shows maybe ten percent of the actual software to be had ... gotta use
>> YAST.
> 
> Did you get a yast2 GUI? 'zypper in yast2' give you choices, one of which
> is to remove busybox-hostname, the other is to install it but some
> dependencies might be missing. I took the goat behind Door 3. It installed
> but it's the ncurses TUI.

   Installed "yast" from "Discovery" - didn't even have
   its real name. Whether you evoke "yast" or "yast2"
   on the CL you get the SAME curses-based interface.
   The old GUI version ... does it still exist ???

>> OpenSUSE used to be kinda 'Cadillac'. Used it for a LONG time - desktops
>> and servers. Now it seems to intentionally work against your desires -
>> as shriveled as a 99 year olds testicles.
> 
> Leap 16 is now downstream of SLE with some additional community packages.
> Yast has been replaced by Myrlyn. The Agama installed is a work in
> progress. A common complaint is people assuming it's a linear install like
> most other distros. If you don't select a DE from the menus on the left
> you get the straight server install. "WTF do I do now?"

   Didn't do the server install. TRIED the XFCE first, very
   threadbare and hates VBox. Then KDE even though I don't
   like it. Has more stuff.

   Just started myrlyn a minute ago ... "searched" for
   "FORTRAN" and "COBOL" with all search-field boxes
   checked. NADA. Checked the "contains" box and it
   FINALLY found some stuff - too MUCH stuff. It's better
   than "discovery" but still not my old GUI YAST.

   And the software SELECTION is much smaller than even
   a few years ago.

> Supposedly they will make it a little more user friendly. Then there's
> CockPit, which I'm not sure really works on Leap yet.
> 
> If you want to live dangerously go for Tumbleweed or Slowroll. They're
> rolling distros. Even that's a little strange as updating is 'zypper dup'
> so every update is treated like a distro update.

   Did TW a couple versions ago. It's kinda like Manjaro,
   more than a few updates and it updates EVERYTHING,
   gigabytes worth. I've got a not-so-great connection.

   As said, OpenSUSE used to be "Cadillac" - now it's
   NOT anything like that. Sad.

   Oh well, DebiVerse Forever it seems .....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87893

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2026-06-12 11:45 +0200
Message-ID<931tfmxnjb.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#87886
On 2026-06-12 09:14, c186282 wrote:
> On 6/12/26 02:22, rbowman wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:49:42 -0400, c186282 wrote:

...

>    Didn't do the server install. TRIED the XFCE first, very
>    threadbare and hates VBox. Then KDE even though I don't
>    like it. Has more stuff.
> 
>    Just started myrlyn a minute ago ... "searched" for
>    "FORTRAN" and "COBOL" with all search-field boxes
>    checked. NADA. Checked the "contains" box and it
>    FINALLY found some stuff - too MUCH stuff. It's better
>    than "discovery" but still not my old GUI YAST.

Use "opi" to search for extra packages.

opi fortran finds dozens of hits.

cer@Laicolasse:~> opi cobol
Searching repos for: cobol
1. gnucobol
2. gnu-cobol
3. gnucobol-esql
4. gnucobol-runtime
5. gnucobol-esql-devel
Pick a number (0 to quit):


This is not new.


> 
>    And the software SELECTION is much smaller than even
>    a few years ago.

Use opi.



-- 
Cheers, Carlos.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87915

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-06-12 23:21 -0400
Message-ID<MY6cnSJK1r0TUbH3nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#87893
On 6/12/26 05:45, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> On 2026-06-12 09:14, c186282 wrote:
>> On 6/12/26 02:22, rbowman wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:49:42 -0400, c186282 wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>    Didn't do the server install. TRIED the XFCE first, very
>>    threadbare and hates VBox. Then KDE even though I don't
>>    like it. Has more stuff.
>>
>>    Just started myrlyn a minute ago ... "searched" for
>>    "FORTRAN" and "COBOL" with all search-field boxes
>>    checked. NADA. Checked the "contains" box and it
>>    FINALLY found some stuff - too MUCH stuff. It's better
>>    than "discovery" but still not my old GUI YAST.
> 
> Use "opi" to search for extra packages.
> 
> opi fortran finds dozens of hits.
> 
> cer@Laicolasse:~> opi cobol
> Searching repos for: cobol
> 1. gnucobol
> 2. gnu-cobol
> 3. gnucobol-esql
> 4. gnucobol-runtime
> 5. gnucobol-esql-devel
> Pick a number (0 to quit):
> 
> 
> This is not new.

   Is to me ... I went Deb some years ago when OS
   dropped a bunch of olde-tyme utils for no good
   reason. I used a lot of those from Python scripts
   and such. Evoke, parse, exactly the info I wanted.

   Now, OS looks just HORRIBLE.

>>    And the software SELECTION is much smaller than even
>>    a few years ago.
> 
> Use opi.

   Hmm - NOT installed by default. Why not ? Barely
   different from zypper.

   After INSTALLING Yast ... the terminal version seems
   the only survivor ... it too can find obscure stuff,
   but makes installation/dependencies easier than zypper.

   Also, 'opi' is pure CLI, not a convenient and very
   helpful GUI thingie like 'synaptic'. Really NOTHING
   beats synaptic for all-around utility. 'OctoPkg'
   comes close, but it's still clunkier.

   Sorry, not sold. Not at all. Seen how it COULD be,
   and now they took it all away.

   Gonna squish it into a Maybe-Someday VDI file and
   stash it somewhere deep and dark until I want the
   disk space back. NO point in wasting my time with
   today's idea of OpenSUSE.

   Some versions of Arch that might be interesting,
   a couple BSDs too. Never tried Gentoo ... might be
   worth a look. Did install GhostBSD on another box,
   not TOO bad, worth more time.

   But OpenSUSE ... past glory, modern DISAPPOINTMENT.

   FLUSH !

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87917

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-06-13 04:20 +0000
Message-ID<n9443hFnm4U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#87915
On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 23:21:18 -0400, c186282 wrote:

>  Some versions of Arch that might be interesting,
>    a couple BSDs too. Never tried Gentoo ... might be worth a look. Did
>    install GhostBSD on another box, not TOO bad, worth more time.

I ran EndeavourOS for a while. It doesn't give you the l33t street cred of 
installing Arch piece by piece but in the end you get a Arch machine with 
a couple of extras. There is a 'Welcome' app to do updates, rank 
repositories, and other stuff. 'yay' does the grunt work of installing AUR 
packages. It worked well until it didn't. I tried to salvage it with a 
live USB but I didn't have much data on it, none of it irretrievable so I 
used the iso I'd used for a VM on the Fedora box.  
 
>    But OpenSUSE ... past glory, modern DISAPPOINTMENT.

I switched to SuSE in 2002, using the shrink wrapped 8.1 Professional from 
BestBuy. I still have the box.

https://www.suse.com/news/81_i386/

"SUSE Linux 8.1 Professional (7 CDs, 1 DVD, User Guide and Administration 
Guide, 90 days of installation support)"

Red Hat Linux had pissed me off and SuSE offered KDE right out of the box. 
I really liked KMail, KNode, and Yast. I ran it at work and at home for 
years. Prior to the current Leap I ran 13.2 well past its EOL. It was 
openSUSE by then. I did not upgrade to Leap 42 since people were having 
problems with the in place upgrade. 

It works and I expect it will be stable since it's downstream of SLE. I 
also has a WSL openSUSE at work and was used to zypper. No interest in 
gnu-cobol so that wasn't a problem.

BTW, thank you. The discussion of the lack of local TV stations led me to 
find that PBS now has a transmitter on TV Mountain which is LOS for me 
rather than Dean Stone, which isn't. And I mean LOS. If a laser designator 
had a 20 km range I could put a Hellfire on it. According to the website 
the translator service was restored 4/1. The schedule is slightly 
different with Austin City Limits on at midnight Sat/Sun.

Mountains present challenges for communication but when you have a 7000' 
mountain you don't need no stinking tower. The Christian analog station 
was close to the ham repeater and I was surprised. It was a simple dipole. 
Of course when you're on top of a mountain you can really get out with a 
2m handheld too.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87960

From"Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2026-06-14 14:27 +0200
Message-ID<n97l0uFgcntU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#87915
On 2026-06-13 05:21, c186282 wrote:
> On 6/12/26 05:45, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>> On 2026-06-12 09:14, c186282 wrote:
>>> On 6/12/26 02:22, rbowman wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:49:42 -0400, c186282 wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>    Didn't do the server install. TRIED the XFCE first, very
>>>    threadbare and hates VBox. Then KDE even though I don't
>>>    like it. Has more stuff.
>>>
>>>    Just started myrlyn a minute ago ... "searched" for
>>>    "FORTRAN" and "COBOL" with all search-field boxes
>>>    checked. NADA. Checked the "contains" box and it
>>>    FINALLY found some stuff - too MUCH stuff. It's better
>>>    than "discovery" but still not my old GUI YAST.
>>
>> Use "opi" to search for extra packages.
>>
>> opi fortran finds dozens of hits.
>>
>> cer@Laicolasse:~> opi cobol
>> Searching repos for: cobol
>> 1. gnucobol
>> 2. gnu-cobol
>> 3. gnucobol-esql
>> 4. gnucobol-runtime
>> 5. gnucobol-esql-devel
>> Pick a number (0 to quit):
>>
>>
>> This is not new.
> 
>    Is to me ... I went Deb some years ago when OS
>    dropped a bunch of olde-tyme utils for no good
>    reason. I used a lot of those from Python scripts
>    and such. Evoke, parse, exactly the info I wanted.
> 
>    Now, OS looks just HORRIBLE.
> 
>>>    And the software SELECTION is much smaller than even
>>>    a few years ago.
>>
>> Use opi.
> 
>    Hmm - NOT installed by default. Why not ? Barely
>    different from zypper.

Not so. It is a lot different than zypper. It searches in all repos, 
configured or not, and finds what repo has it. Then it adds the repo and 
install the package(s), by calling zypper.

> 
>    After INSTALLING Yast ... the terminal version seems
>    the only survivor ... it too can find obscure stuff,
>    but makes installation/dependencies easier than zypper.

Do not use YaST, it is not maintained. It will cause errors eventually. 
Use myrlin.

> 
>    Also, 'opi' is pure CLI, not a convenient and very
>    helpful GUI thingie like 'synaptic'. Really NOTHING
>    beats synaptic for all-around utility. 'OctoPkg'
>    comes close, but it's still clunkier.
> 
>    Sorry, not sold. Not at all. Seen how it COULD be,
>    and now they took it all away.

I don't care you don't like it. YOU HAVE to use opi to find things you 
don't find with zypper or myrlin. There is no alternative.

> 
>    Gonna squish it into a Maybe-Someday VDI file and
>    stash it somewhere deep and dark until I want the
>    disk space back. NO point in wasting my time with
>    today's idea of OpenSUSE.
> 
>    Some versions of Arch that might be interesting,
>    a couple BSDs too. Never tried Gentoo ... might be
>    worth a look. Did install GhostBSD on another box,
>    not TOO bad, worth more time.
> 
>    But OpenSUSE ... past glory, modern DISAPPOINTMENT.
> 
>    FLUSH !
> 


-- 
Cheers,
        Carlos E.R.
        ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87971

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-06-14 22:51 -0400
Message-ID<xFSdnax6L8ov9bL3nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#87960
On 6/14/26 08:27, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> On 2026-06-13 05:21, c186282 wrote:
>> On 6/12/26 05:45, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>> On 2026-06-12 09:14, c186282 wrote:
>>>> On 6/12/26 02:22, rbowman wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:49:42 -0400, c186282 wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>    Didn't do the server install. TRIED the XFCE first, very
>>>>    threadbare and hates VBox. Then KDE even though I don't
>>>>    like it. Has more stuff.
>>>>
>>>>    Just started myrlyn a minute ago ... "searched" for
>>>>    "FORTRAN" and "COBOL" with all search-field boxes
>>>>    checked. NADA. Checked the "contains" box and it
>>>>    FINALLY found some stuff - too MUCH stuff. It's better
>>>>    than "discovery" but still not my old GUI YAST.
>>>
>>> Use "opi" to search for extra packages.
>>>
>>> opi fortran finds dozens of hits.
>>>
>>> cer@Laicolasse:~> opi cobol
>>> Searching repos for: cobol
>>> 1. gnucobol
>>> 2. gnu-cobol
>>> 3. gnucobol-esql
>>> 4. gnucobol-runtime
>>> 5. gnucobol-esql-devel
>>> Pick a number (0 to quit):
>>>
>>>
>>> This is not new.
>>
>>    Is to me ... I went Deb some years ago when OS
>>    dropped a bunch of olde-tyme utils for no good
>>    reason. I used a lot of those from Python scripts
>>    and such. Evoke, parse, exactly the info I wanted.
>>
>>    Now, OS looks just HORRIBLE.
>>
>>>>    And the software SELECTION is much smaller than even
>>>>    a few years ago.
>>>
>>> Use opi.
>>
>>    Hmm - NOT installed by default. Why not ? Barely
>>    different from zypper.
> 
> Not so. It is a lot different than zypper. It searches in all repos, 
> configured or not, and finds what repo has it. Then it adds the repo and 
> install the package(s), by calling zypper.
> 
>>
>>    After INSTALLING Yast ... the terminal version seems
>>    the only survivor ... it too can find obscure stuff,
>>    but makes installation/dependencies easier than zypper.
> 
> Do not use YaST, it is not maintained. It will cause errors eventually. 
> Use myrlin.
> 
>>
>>    Also, 'opi' is pure CLI, not a convenient and very
>>    helpful GUI thingie like 'synaptic'. Really NOTHING
>>    beats synaptic for all-around utility. 'OctoPkg'
>>    comes close, but it's still clunkier.
>>
>>    Sorry, not sold. Not at all. Seen how it COULD be,
>>    and now they took it all away.
> 
> I don't care you don't like it. YOU HAVE to use opi to find things you 
> don't find with zypper or myrlin. There is no alternative.
> 
>>
>>    Gonna squish it into a Maybe-Someday VDI file and
>>    stash it somewhere deep and dark until I want the
>>    disk space back. NO point in wasting my time with
>>    today's idea of OpenSUSE.
>>
>>    Some versions of Arch that might be interesting,
>>    a couple BSDs too. Never tried Gentoo ... might be
>>    worth a look. Did install GhostBSD on another box,
>>    not TOO bad, worth more time.
>>
>>    But OpenSUSE ... past glory, modern DISAPPOINTMENT.
>>
>>    FLUSH !

   Thanks.

   But it's GONE. Not worth the time anymore.

   Downloading a couple of Solaris derivs, including
   something called 'Tribblix' with fair reviews. The
   mirror is SLOW SLOW SLOW alas.

   Those will keep me occupied next week  :-)

   Solaris was a perfectly decent IX-ish system that
   kind of got lost in the shuffle. OpenIndiana is
   the most worthy modern heir. I've fooled with it
   several years ago and it wasn't bad. May be even
   better now. 'Tribblix' is pulled from that - but
   is claimed to have a more sane packaging system
   and be more desktop friendly. CL installation
   from the live ver however, something about a
   "kitchen-sink" install model  :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87975

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-06-15 03:15 +0000
Message-ID<n9991nFpegbU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#87971
On Sun, 14 Jun 2026 22:51:11 -0400, c186282 wrote:

>    Downloading a couple of Solaris derivs, including something called
>    'Tribblix' with fair reviews. The mirror is SLOW SLOW SLOW alas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trouble_with_Tribbles

I was never into Star Trek and never saw that episode. However I had read 
Heinlein's 'The Rolling Stones', maybe even in the 'Boy's Life' version, 
and really wanted a flat cat. That might have something to do with my like 
for non-flat cats. Heinlein signed off on the Tribbles script though he 
later regretted it.

Heinlein's 'juveniles' got him from the pulps to more serious novels, but 
I was in the right place at the right time since most were published in 
the '50s. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87980

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-06-15 01:46 -0400
Message-ID<5CWdnWxP9p1eDLL3nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#87975
On 6/14/26 23:15, rbowman wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2026 22:51:11 -0400, c186282 wrote:
> 
>>     Downloading a couple of Solaris derivs, including something called
>>     'Tribblix' with fair reviews. The mirror is SLOW SLOW SLOW alas.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trouble_with_Tribbles
> 
> I was never into Star Trek and never saw that episode. However I had read
> Heinlein's 'The Rolling Stones', maybe even in the 'Boy's Life' version,
> and really wanted a flat cat. That might have something to do with my like
> for non-flat cats. Heinlein signed off on the Tribbles script though he
> later regretted it.
> 
> Heinlein's 'juveniles' got him from the pulps to more serious novels, but
> I was in the right place at the right time since most were published in
> the '50s.

   Did, FINALLY, get "Tribblix" to download.

   I'll test it tomorrow.

   Alas smells of a One Guy operation. Not so great.
   Reviews were OK ... but will it be there tomorrow ?

   Solaris was pretty OK ... and it's heirs too.
   DID make some use of OpenIndiana a few years
   ago - though it's biased for HUGE servers.
   Worth checking back to see what's improved
   some years later.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87989

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-06-15 07:16 +0000
Message-ID<n99n73Frbe7U6@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#87980
On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 01:46:23 -0400, c186282 wrote:

>   Alas smells of a One Guy operation. Not so great.
>    Reviews were OK ... but will it be there tomorrow ?

I got the impression it's Peter Tribble in a garage some where. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87994

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2026-06-15 17:02 +0000
Message-ID<1fWXR.33972$XSac.16787@fx03.iad>
In reply to#87975
On 2026-06-15, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Jun 2026 22:51:11 -0400, c186282 wrote:
>
>>    Downloading a couple of Solaris derivs, including something called
>>    'Tribblix' with fair reviews. The mirror is SLOW SLOW SLOW alas.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trouble_with_Tribbles
>
> I was never into Star Trek and never saw that episode. However I had read 
> Heinlein's 'The Rolling Stones', maybe even in the 'Boy's Life' version, 
> and really wanted a flat cat. That might have something to do with my like 
> for non-flat cats. Heinlein signed off on the Tribbles script though he 
> later regretted it.

Funny you should mention that.  I just finished re-reading "The Rolling
Stones" yesterday - I've been working through my entire Heinlein collection.
The flat cats are indeed cute.  "Tribbles", on the other hand, was cute but,
uh, fluff.  :-)

> Heinlein's 'juveniles' got him from the pulps to more serious novels, but 
> I was in the right place at the right time since most were published in 
> the '50s. 

When I started junior high in the '60s, the school library had a decent
science fiction section, including a number of Heinlein's juveniles.
That's where I got started reading good SF (and learned the difference
between good SF and BEM schlock).

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  No artificial
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  intelligence was
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  used in the creation
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |  of this post.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87995

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-06-15 19:05 +0000
Message-ID<n9b0o4F36vaU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#87994
On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:02:53 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

> When I started junior high in the '60s, the school library had a decent
> science fiction section, including a number of Heinlein's juveniles.
> That's where I got started reading good SF (and learned the difference
> between good SF and BEM schlock).

We didn't have a designated junior high, only 7th and 8th grades. They did 
set up so we moved between classrooms to get us used to high school.

The high school library was decent. I stumbled across Vonnegut's 'Player 
Piano' there.  Vonnegut's fame came later and I think it might have beena 
included because of the setting. It was Troy High School and his fictional 
town was Ilium. The setting was actually closer to Schenectady where he 
had worked at GE.

It hit close to home. I was pointed to a career as some sort of engineer, 
TBD, and the  plot has society divided between engineers and managers on 
one part of town, and the former workers displaced by automation in 
another. They worked as 'Reeks and Recks', recreation and reclamation make 
work projects. 

When I graduated high school I continued at the local engineering school 
that was basically across the street from the high school. Graduated, and 
got a job designing automated molding systems. Yup. Now we've reached the 
point where the engineers are being automated out of a job. Of course 
plastics production and other manufacturing jobs were shipped to 
Bangladesh long ago. Why spend money on automation when labor is cheap?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87996

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-06-15 20:41 +0100
Message-ID<110pkh0$jklg$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#87995
On 15/06/2026 20:05, rbowman wrote:
> Why spend money on automation when labor is cheap?

Because automation is cheaper?

-- 
“It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established 
authorities are wrong.”

― Voltaire, The Age of Louis XIV

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87997

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-06-15 22:21 +0000
Message-ID<n9bc6iF54o3U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#87996
On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 20:41:20 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 15/06/2026 20:05, rbowman wrote:
>> Why spend money on automation when labor is cheap?
> 
> Because automation is cheaper?

That was not the decision taken by many US firms. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#87998

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-06-16 02:00 +0100
Message-ID<110q786$p0bm$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#87997
On 15/06/2026 23:21, rbowman wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 20:41:20 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> On 15/06/2026 20:05, rbowman wrote:
>>> Why spend money on automation when labor is cheap?
>>
>> Because automation is cheaper?
> 
> That was not the decision taken by many US firms.

One cant account for technologically backward countries

-- 
Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc


csiph-web