Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #61808 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-07 02:33 -0500 |
| Last post | 2024-12-09 22:35 +0100 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 22 participants
Thread has 1096 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1096 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-07 02:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 14:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 18:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-12-11 17:13 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 21:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-09 15:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 16:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? BlueManedHawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 15:15 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 21:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-08 04:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 02:37 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 13:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-08 18:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 01:13 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 00:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 01:08 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 14:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 23:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-09 00:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 00:20 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-10 01:11 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-09 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 17:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 23:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-10 11:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 20:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 13:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 16:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 21:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-12 19:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-13 13:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 01:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 18:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-15 21:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-17 04:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:48 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 20:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 22:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-11 03:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 01:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-11 04:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-11 13:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-12 04:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 08:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 02:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 01:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 01:52 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-17 04:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-18 00:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:46 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 19:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:39 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 15:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 15:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 16:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 18:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 21:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:42 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 08:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2024-12-13 09:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 11:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 13:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 05:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-10 01:49 -0500
Joy of Hydrogen (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 13:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-09 00:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 01:16 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 10:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 10:37 +0000
Joy of Nuclear Power (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 16:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 21:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 16:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 15:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-13 06:42 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 10:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-14 07:51 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-14 11:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-15 10:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 11:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-15 16:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 16:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-12 21:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 19:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 12:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 17:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 18:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 01:31 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 15:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 17:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 03:09 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 02:30 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:34 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-20 21:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 11:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 17:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 03:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 02:27 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 07:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 08:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 20:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 22:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 20:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 00:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 02:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 18:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-26 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 00:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-27 17:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-26 22:41 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 05:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 23:44 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 16:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 23:51 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-27 18:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 06:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 02:31 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2025-01-01 05:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-27 17:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-23 21:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 01:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 04:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 21:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:38 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 21:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:55 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 07:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 21:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:37 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-15 00:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 12:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 17:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 21:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-19 04:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 18:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 02:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 15:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 00:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 22:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:08 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-26 21:41 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 04:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:52 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:45 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:39 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:27 +0000
The Joy of Tax Havens Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:53 +0000
Re: The Joy of Tax Havens D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 02:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:04 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 11:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 12:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-31 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 22:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-03 00:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 08:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 20:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:32 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:25 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 01:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:01 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 07:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 22:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-01 12:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 21:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 00:11 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 06:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 07:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 03:22 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 23:43 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 23:47 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 00:59 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-22 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:12 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-23 20:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-16 21:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 16:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 15:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 01:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 00:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 23:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 01:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 21:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 02:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 00:35 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 06:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 01:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-26 03:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 00:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 23:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 03:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 19:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 00:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:06 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 00:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 01:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 16:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 12:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 16:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:48 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-01 03:23 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 22:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:36 +0000
The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 02:02 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 03:24 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:34 +0100
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 23:41 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 07:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:34 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 16:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 16:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 12:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 19:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 02:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 17:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 20:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 20:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 22:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-21 03:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:53 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 07:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-21 21:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:51 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 08:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 22:28 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 10:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:59 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 13:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 21:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 01:53 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 09:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-22 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 01:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 13:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-27 18:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 02:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 19:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 02:39 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 23:10 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 01:50 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 10:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 22:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:29 -0700
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 21:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 00:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-19 16:30 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 00:44 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 16:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:21 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-13 06:59 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 01:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 01:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 02:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 10:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-10 22:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 13:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:30 +0100
Linux 6.12.4 (was: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-10 11:47 +0000
Re: Linux 6.12.4 (was: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 01:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 03:42 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 11:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 16:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:29 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-13 23:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 23:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 18:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:44 +0100
The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-14 21:26 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:31 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-15 14:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-15 14:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 18:05 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 18:02 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:47 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:10 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:04 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:44 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 21:18 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:14 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 04:07 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:49 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:28 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:41 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 00:05 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 07:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 10:01 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 19:11 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 20:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:02 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:07 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:59 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 22:32 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:06 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:01 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:43 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 22:03 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:14 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:59 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:45 -0700
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:56 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-19 16:35 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 03:32 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 03:56 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 05:05 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:42 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:00 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 21:56 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:25 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:50 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:49 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:47 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 10:00 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:28 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:16 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:17 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 03:22 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 09:18 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:45 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:23 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 09:54 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:45 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:40 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:06 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 22:04 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 05:46 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 02:12 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 09:31 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:53 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 15:22 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:54 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:46 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:59 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 00:13 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 06:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 08:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 18:20 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:29 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:10 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 02:10 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 06:26 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:55 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:10 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:43 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 01:57 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 21:08 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:36 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:54 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:42 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:05 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 01:24 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:38 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:24 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 21:12 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:15 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:14 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:35 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:29 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:38 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:30 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:40 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 08:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:34 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 20:17 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:40 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:27 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:32 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:52 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:56 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:38 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:24 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:38 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:00 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-17 23:56 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:31 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 21:49 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:56 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:47 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 22:31 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:48 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:54 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:22 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-16 20:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:34 +0100
Newsreader mechanicals Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-17 20:17 +0000
Re: Newsreader mechanicals Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-17 18:41 -0500
Re: Newsreader mechanicals D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-17 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-17 20:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:10 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 08:42 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 17:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 12:17 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 00:16 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:28 +0100
Hydrogen Cars (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 12:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 00:07 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 06:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 20:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 03:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 14:10 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 13:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 14:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 16:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 22:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 09:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 10:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202412.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2024-12-11 21:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:35 +0100
Page 12 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 … 50 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-15 02:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ls6sfjFt2anU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62423 |
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 23:15:52 +0100, D wrote: > I always find it interesting, that the cheap rhetorical device of > connecting someone with holocaust deniers, passes unnoticed through even > the most major and established media houses. All I will say about that is it took a while to develop the campaign. The teacher introduced us to linoleum block printing in the 'art' class in the late '50s. Swastikas were a popular motif among the male members. Today we would all be marched off to re-education camp. Japs weren't popular but the Germans had a certain mystique.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-15 11:42 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <0d5d463f-af08-46aa-97e3-ef251ba64cc4@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62436 |
On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 23:15:52 +0100, D wrote: > >> I always find it interesting, that the cheap rhetorical device of >> connecting someone with holocaust deniers, passes unnoticed through even >> the most major and established media houses. > > All I will say about that is it took a while to develop the campaign. > > The teacher introduced us to linoleum block printing in the 'art' class in > the late '50s. Swastikas were a popular motif among the male members. > Today we would all be marched off to re-education camp. Japs weren't > popular but the Germans had a certain mystique. > It still happens from time to time. Didn't one member of the british royal house dress as a nazi at a masquerade? I also know that a few politicians here and there from the sweden democrats have been kicked out for having nazi tattoos that at one time or other were caught on camera. Then I remember when I was young, I met one guy who was into collecting Nazi mementos. I wonder how long he would have survived growing up in todays world. ;) I also sometimes wonder if he today is a computer security consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-15 12:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vjmjl8$irct$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62448 |
On 15/12/2024 10:42, D wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 23:15:52 +0100, D wrote:
>>
>>> I always find it interesting, that the cheap rhetorical device of
>>> connecting someone with holocaust deniers, passes unnoticed through even
>>> the most major and established media houses.
>>
>> All I will say about that is it took a while to develop the campaign.
>>
>> The teacher introduced us to linoleum block printing in the 'art'
>> class in
>> the late '50s. Swastikas were a popular motif among the male members.
>> Today we would all be marched off to re-education camp. Japs weren't
>> popular but the Germans had a certain mystique.
>>
>
> It still happens from time to time. Didn't one member of the british
> royal house dress as a nazi at a masquerade? I also know that a few
> politicians here and there from the sweden democrats have been kicked
> out for having nazi tattoos that at one time or other were caught on
> camera.
>
> Then I remember when I was young, I met one guy who was into collecting
> Nazi mementos. I wonder how long he would have survived growing up in
> todays world. ;)
>
I once bought a book.
It purported to be the memoirs of a SS captain IIRC, who fought in
France and Germany, and then joined the French foreign legion to fight
in French Indo-China (Vietnam). He professed to loathe communism and
communists. His tactics were brutal, But effective.
I think I paid a couple of bucks for it in a second-hand book store in
Johannesburg.
I lent it to someone who didn't give it back, so I looked to see if it
was still for sale.
It was, For *hundreds of pounds*, on ebay.
That prompted me to look for other examples of Nazi themed items. This
shit goes for unbelievable sums. People with a lot of money love the
whole Nazi meme. It is and was great theatre. Great logo. Fantastic
marketing. Let's all be supermen and kick the shit out of the [insert
social group you despise most]...who secretly doesn't want to do that?
(I found the book in the bookcase of the person I lent it to, she simply
forgot it, so I took it back)
> I also sometimes wonder if he today is a computer security consultant.
Far more likely he runs an advertising company.
--
"Fanaticism consists in redoubling your effort when you have
forgotten your aim."
George Santayana
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-15 17:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <2d60ea9e-620a-9883-141c-fb9f33d03f99@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62456 |
On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 15/12/2024 10:42, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 23:15:52 +0100, D wrote: >>> >>>> I always find it interesting, that the cheap rhetorical device of >>>> connecting someone with holocaust deniers, passes unnoticed through even >>>> the most major and established media houses. >>> >>> All I will say about that is it took a while to develop the campaign. >>> >>> The teacher introduced us to linoleum block printing in the 'art' class in >>> the late '50s. Swastikas were a popular motif among the male members. >>> Today we would all be marched off to re-education camp. Japs weren't >>> popular but the Germans had a certain mystique. >>> >> >> It still happens from time to time. Didn't one member of the british royal >> house dress as a nazi at a masquerade? I also know that a few politicians >> here and there from the sweden democrats have been kicked out for having >> nazi tattoos that at one time or other were caught on camera. >> >> Then I remember when I was young, I met one guy who was into collecting >> Nazi mementos. I wonder how long he would have survived growing up in >> todays world. ;) >> > I once bought a book. > It purported to be the memoirs of a SS captain IIRC, who fought in France and > Germany, and then joined the French foreign legion to fight in French > Indo-China (Vietnam). He professed to loathe communism and communists. His > tactics were brutal, But effective. > > I think I paid a couple of bucks for it in a second-hand book store in > Johannesburg. > > I lent it to someone who didn't give it back, so I looked to see if it was > still for sale. > It was, For *hundreds of pounds*, on ebay. > > That prompted me to look for other examples of Nazi themed items. This shit > goes for unbelievable sums. People with a lot of money love the whole Nazi > meme. It is and was great theatre. Great logo. Fantastic marketing. Let's all > be supermen and kick the shit out of the [insert social group you despise > most]...who secretly doesn't want to do that? > > > (I found the book in the bookcase of the person I lent it to, she simply > forgot it, so I took it back) I am not surprised. I have some downloaded movies that are no longer available online. I also have some used books which I think might command way higher prices than when I bought them, since no new books on those themes have been released. >> I also sometimes wonder if he today is a computer security consultant. > > Far more likely he runs an advertising company. Maybe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-15 18:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ls8m7fF7o5dU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62448 |
On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 11:42:21 +0100, D wrote: > It still happens from time to time. Didn't one member of the british > royal house dress as a nazi at a masquerade? I also know that a few > politicians here and there from the sweden democrats have been kicked > out for having nazi tattoos that at one time or other were caught on > camera. There is a lot of history that some would like to forget. The Norwegians executed Quisling as their sacrificial lamb and to hear them tell everyone was in the resistance. France, Sweden, Finland and most other European countries developed amnesia without the need to shoot anyone although some rehabilitation might have been necessary. The US wasn't occupied so it was difficult to 'colloborate'.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-15 23:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <a0ee6a97-3650-f78f-c9cc-fa4bac543655@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62467 |
On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 11:42:21 +0100, D wrote: > >> It still happens from time to time. Didn't one member of the british >> royal house dress as a nazi at a masquerade? I also know that a few >> politicians here and there from the sweden democrats have been kicked >> out for having nazi tattoos that at one time or other were caught on >> camera. > > There is a lot of history that some would like to forget. The Norwegians > executed Quisling as their sacrificial lamb and to hear them tell everyone > was in the resistance. France, Sweden, Finland and most other European > countries developed amnesia without the need to shoot anyone although some > rehabilitation might have been necessary. The US wasn't occupied so it was > difficult to 'colloborate'. > This is the truth! Sweden most definitely collaborated under the flag of neutrality. Not a very honorable way, but I am convinced it saved a lot of swedes, at the cost of a lot of other people. This is a fun topic to start if you ever meet any swedes! ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 03:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ls9mprFcabuU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62475 |
On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 23:01:26 +0100, D wrote: > This is the truth! Sweden most definitely collaborated under the flag of > neutrality. Not a very honorable way, but I am convinced it saved a lot > of swedes, at the cost of a lot of other people. This is a fun topic to > start if you ever meet any swedes! I think it was a novel by Larrson, Åsa, not that other one, that worked in some not-quite-rehabilitated people.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 10:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <451210c3-9b3d-91f1-be43-d06211f3b30f@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62492 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 23:01:26 +0100, D wrote: > >> This is the truth! Sweden most definitely collaborated under the flag of >> neutrality. Not a very honorable way, but I am convinced it saved a lot >> of swedes, at the cost of a lot of other people. This is a fun topic to >> start if you ever meet any swedes! > > I think it was a novel by Larrson, Åsa, not that other one, that worked in > some not-quite-rehabilitated people. > Hm, doesn't ring a bell. A quick search only got me finnish books for some reason.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 20:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lsbhaoFn55gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62504 |
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 10:38:58 +0100, D wrote: > Hm, doesn't ring a bell. A quick search only got me finnish books for > some reason. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%85sa_Larsson I see most of them are now in English translations. Germans love their Schwedenkrimi so there's often a German translation first that is available on Kindle. It keeps my German familiarity from vanishing completely.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 10:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <812b41ff-53e1-48d3-8088-d186fa65d90a@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62535 |
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 10:38:58 +0100, D wrote: > >> Hm, doesn't ring a bell. A quick search only got me finnish books for >> some reason. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%85sa_Larsson > > I see most of them are now in English translations. Germans love their > Schwedenkrimi so there's often a German translation first that is > available on Kindle. It keeps my German familiarity from vanishing > completely. > Ahh.. ok, now I know. "Her books and characters serve as the basis for the internationally successful TV series Rebecka Martinsson." I've seen an episode or two when visiting Stockholm, since my father really enjoys criminal shows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 21:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lse8dpF5ikfU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62568 |
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:22:36 +0100, D wrote: > Ahh.. ok, now I know. "Her books and characters serve as the basis for > the internationally successful TV series Rebecka Martinsson." I've seen > an episode or two when visiting Stockholm, since my father really enjoys > criminal shows. I didn't know it had become a TV series. Amazon has it for $18 for the first year. I'll have to try it when I finish the 'Leverage' series. 'Leverage' is sort of apropos. It's a team of grifters and thieves that take down people like corrupt insurance CEOs. They don't shoot them but expose them and clean out their accounts to reimburse those that they screwed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-18 20:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <fea6ae4f-5fe5-8120-2586-88e4b1d570be@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62600 |
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:22:36 +0100, D wrote: > >> Ahh.. ok, now I know. "Her books and characters serve as the basis for >> the internationally successful TV series Rebecka Martinsson." I've seen >> an episode or two when visiting Stockholm, since my father really enjoys >> criminal shows. > > I didn't know it had become a TV series. Amazon has it for $18 for the > first year. I'll have to try it when I finish the 'Leverage' series. > > 'Leverage' is sort of apropos. It's a team of grifters and thieves that > take down people like corrupt insurance CEOs. They don't shoot them but > expose them and clean out their accounts to reimburse those that they > screwed. I'm currently watching Pantheon. It is animated, but I find it quite well researched when it comes to the transhumanist theme of mind uploading. I suspect the second season will not be as good as the first, and towards the end the quality dropped. But it has a good start!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-19 00:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <UQKdnUKJir8UNf76nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62642 |
On 12/18/24 2:19 PM, D wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:22:36 +0100, D wrote: >> >>> Ahh.. ok, now I know. "Her books and characters serve as the basis for >>> the internationally successful TV series Rebecka Martinsson." I've seen >>> an episode or two when visiting Stockholm, since my father really enjoys >>> criminal shows. >> >> I didn't know it had become a TV series. Amazon has it for $18 for the >> first year. I'll have to try it when I finish the 'Leverage' series. >> >> 'Leverage' is sort of apropos. It's a team of grifters and thieves that >> take down people like corrupt insurance CEOs. They don't shoot them but >> expose them and clean out their accounts to reimburse those that they >> screwed. > > I'm currently watching Pantheon. It is animated, but I find it quite > well researched when it comes to the transhumanist theme of mind > uploading. I suspect the second season will not be as good as the first, > and towards the end the quality dropped. But it has a good start! Alas, like time travel, the more you think about 'mind uploading' the more improbable it seems. 'Mind' is COMPLICATED ... and there's more than just neurons involved. 'Mind' is an 'environment'. As for "Robin Hoods" - there are many ways of looking at that paradigm. Who "deserves" what ... not so easy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-19 11:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <b5592fc5-3197-31cf-ac59-8a44e7db1ea3@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62670 |
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 12/18/24 2:19 PM, D wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:22:36 +0100, D wrote: >>> >>>> Ahh.. ok, now I know. "Her books and characters serve as the basis for >>>> the internationally successful TV series Rebecka Martinsson." I've seen >>>> an episode or two when visiting Stockholm, since my father really enjoys >>>> criminal shows. >>> >>> I didn't know it had become a TV series. Amazon has it for $18 for the >>> first year. I'll have to try it when I finish the 'Leverage' series. >>> >>> 'Leverage' is sort of apropos. It's a team of grifters and thieves that >>> take down people like corrupt insurance CEOs. They don't shoot them but >>> expose them and clean out their accounts to reimburse those that they >>> screwed. >> >> I'm currently watching Pantheon. It is animated, but I find it quite well >> researched when it comes to the transhumanist theme of mind uploading. I >> suspect the second season will not be as good as the first, and towards the >> end the quality dropped. But it has a good start! > > > Alas, like time travel, the more you think about > 'mind uploading' the more improbable it seems. > 'Mind' is COMPLICATED ... and there's more than > just neurons involved. 'Mind' is an 'environment'. This is the truth! I like transhumanists as much as the next guy, but sometimes I think their technology optimists comes too close to religion for my comfort. Yes, I see no reason that should make uploading impossible, in theory, but we have no clue about how the mind works, so there could be plenty of reasons it won't work. Add to that the enormous quantum leap (or multiple quantum leaps) in technology, before being able to even physically replicate it. But with the religious, once I try that conversational track, I am shouted down and bood. =( So basically, they extrapolate from 1 + 1 = 2, to a billion trillion and often handwave away the steps in between. That is what makes some of them religious in my opinion. > As for "Robin Hoods" - there are many ways of looking > at that paradigm. Who "deserves" what ... not so easy. Robin Hoods? You mean stealing from the government and giving to the people? The eternal libertarian hero?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 01:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <SLicnU51cs7fkvj6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62698 |
On 12/19/24 5:04 AM, D wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> On 12/18/24 2:19 PM, D wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:22:36 +0100, D wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ahh.. ok, now I know. "Her books and characters serve as the basis for >>>>> the internationally successful TV series Rebecka Martinsson." I've >>>>> seen >>>>> an episode or two when visiting Stockholm, since my father really >>>>> enjoys >>>>> criminal shows. >>>> >>>> I didn't know it had become a TV series. Amazon has it for $18 for the >>>> first year. I'll have to try it when I finish the 'Leverage' series. >>>> >>>> 'Leverage' is sort of apropos. It's a team of grifters and thieves that >>>> take down people like corrupt insurance CEOs. They don't shoot them but >>>> expose them and clean out their accounts to reimburse those that they >>>> screwed. >>> >>> I'm currently watching Pantheon. It is animated, but I find it quite >>> well researched when it comes to the transhumanist theme of mind >>> uploading. I suspect the second season will not be as good as the >>> first, and towards the end the quality dropped. But it has a good start! >> >> >> Alas, like time travel, the more you think about >> 'mind uploading' the more improbable it seems. >> 'Mind' is COMPLICATED ... and there's more than >> just neurons involved. 'Mind' is an 'environment'. > > This is the truth! I like transhumanists as much as the next guy, but > sometimes I think their technology optimists comes too close to religion > for my comfort. Religions and related philosophies often think of some kind of magical 'essence of being' that can drift around. It's from the dark ages and beyond. Great for horror movie plots though. Quite often we see papers describing how any of dozens of 'helper' cells are modulating neuron activity on the large and small scale. Some have neuron-ish qualities unto themselves. The big blob of meat is a UNIT. You can digitize the fine state of every neuron and you'll just get an infunctional MESS on the other end. It's kinda All Or Nothing. We're not built like computers - 'evo-goo' instead. (hey, I *like* that term and officially claim it :-) > Yes, I see no reason that should make uploading impossible, in theory, > but we have no clue about how the mind works, so there could be plenty > of reasons it won't work. Add to that the enormous quantum leap (or > multiple quantum leaps) in technology, before being able to even > physically replicate it. But with the religious, once I try that > conversational track, I am shouted down and bood. =( IM-possible, no - but you're not just gonna do some kind of fancy MRI and transport a "mind" into any one or any thing. > So basically, they extrapolate from 1 + 1 = 2, to a billion trillion and > often handwave away the steps in between. That is what makes some of > them religious in my opinion. It's the 'hand-wave' thing that sunk the first AI paradigm. Marv Minsky (who posted on usenet for awhile) and friends saw how easily 'decisions' could be done with a transistor or two and assumed it would thus be easy to build an AI. AC Clarke used the Minsky optimism when fashioning the idea of "HAL". But it all imploded. Turned out there were billions of steps between input and that final, transistor-like, decision. A photo-lightswitch is not 'intelligent'. >> As for "Robin Hoods" - there are many ways of looking >> at that paradigm. Who "deserves" what ... not so easy. > > Robin Hoods? You mean stealing from the government and giving to the > people? The eternal libertarian hero? Um ... more 'commie' hero ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 10:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9dbdf937-5f95-77d4-eaf8-b7dacda5edfb@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62758 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> just neurons involved. 'Mind' is an 'environment'. >> >> This is the truth! I like transhumanists as much as the next guy, but >> sometimes I think their technology optimists comes too close to religion >> for my comfort. > > Religions and related philosophies often think of > some kind of magical 'essence of being' that can > drift around. It's from the dark ages and beyond. > Great for horror movie plots though. So you don't think that we are all god, living in god, being gods parts and components? ;) > Quite often we see papers describing how any of dozens > of 'helper' cells are modulating neuron activity on > the large and small scale. Some have neuron-ish qualities > unto themselves. The big blob of meat is a UNIT. You can > digitize the fine state of every neuron and you'll just > get an infunctional MESS on the other end. > > It's kinda All Or Nothing. We're not built like > computers - 'evo-goo' instead. > > (hey, I *like* that term and officially claim it :-) Well, I see nothing that says we wouldn't be able to live in another kind of substrate if everything was simulated, but I find the philosophical questions of if it would really be _us_ more interesting (assuming it works, of course). I'm in the camp believing that if everything worked, and you have an uploaded intelligence that for all intents and purposes acts like you, it wouldn't be you. I like conscious continuity, but many transhumanists do not require that or believe that. >> Yes, I see no reason that should make uploading impossible, in theory, but >> we have no clue about how the mind works, so there could be plenty of >> reasons it won't work. Add to that the enormous quantum leap (or multiple >> quantum leaps) in technology, before being able to even physically >> replicate it. But with the religious, once I try that conversational track, >> I am shouted down and bood. =( > > > IM-possible, no - but you're not just gonna do some > kind of fancy MRI and transport a "mind" into any > one or any thing. Come on! You're being so negative. Show some faith!! ;) For me, the big problem is that we don't (yet) know how to mind works and even what consciousness is, so how can we replicate it? >> So basically, they extrapolate from 1 + 1 = 2, to a billion trillion and >> often handwave away the steps in between. That is what makes some of them >> religious in my opinion. > > It's the 'hand-wave' thing that sunk the first AI paradigm. > Marv Minsky (who posted on usenet for awhile) and friends > saw how easily 'decisions' could be done with a transistor > or two and assumed it would thus be easy to build an AI. > AC Clarke used the Minsky optimism when fashioning the > idea of "HAL". > > But it all imploded. Turned out there were billions of > steps between input and that final, transistor-like, > decision. A photo-lightswitch is not 'intelligent'. But now we have LLM:s! ;) What I find interesting is how different people view them. I find the free ones you can play with online to be incredibly boring. I use them as a kind of search engine on steroids for stuff that is not important (for entertainment purposes). I would not trust them for anything business, there I must check manually to make sure all is correct. Then you have people who fall in love with their LLM. I find that incredible! Would they have fallen in love with Eliza? >>> As for "Robin Hoods" - there are many ways of looking >>> at that paradigm. Who "deserves" what ... not so easy. >> >> Robin Hoods? You mean stealing from the government and giving to the >> people? The eternal libertarian hero? > > Um ... more 'commie' hero .... Ahh... that spin of Robin Hood. It is not so good. =/ I read two of the older editions Pyle and McFadden (I think) and there he seemed to be more libertarian/anarchist than commie, always fighting the state.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 11:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vk3k83$3dfgu$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62778 |
On 20/12/2024 09:57, D wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >>>> just neurons involved. 'Mind' is an 'environment'. >>> >>> This is the truth! I like transhumanists as much as the next guy, but >>> sometimes I think their technology optimists comes too close to >>> religion for my comfort. >> >> Religions and related philosophies often think of >> some kind of magical 'essence of being' that can >> drift around. It's from the dark ages and beyond. >> Great for horror movie plots though. > > So you don't think that we are all god, living in god, being gods parts and > components? ;) > Well that's Spinoza's hypothesis. What you term the material world is just 'God, made manifest' No more demented than any other metaphysical position. >> Quite often we see papers describing how any of dozens >> of 'helper' cells are modulating neuron activity on >> the large and small scale. Some have neuron-ish qualities >> unto themselves. The big blob of meat is a UNIT. You can >> digitize the fine state of every neuron and you'll just >> get an infunctional MESS on the other end. >> >> It's kinda All Or Nothing. We're not built like >> computers - 'evo-goo' instead. >> >> (hey, I *like* that term and officially claim it :-) > > Well, I see nothing that says we wouldn't be able to live in another > kind of substrate if everything was simulated, but I find the > philosophical questions of if it would really be _us_ more > interesting (assuming it works, of course). Well yes. The human experience seems to be that of a consciousness bolted on to an unruly animal. And most religions seem to be a process of denying or repressing that, whereas the happier people simply accept there are two people inside them and try and reach an accommodation. > I'm in the camp believing that if everything worked, and you have an > uploaded intelligence that for all intents and purposes acts like > you, it wouldn't be you. I like conscious continuity, but many > transhumanists do not require that or believe that. > The position is simply the old idea of 'soul' rehashed into IT terms. The point is that there is the animal self, that it coexists with (or for you, from whence consciousness emerges) Without that bag of biochemistry you wouldn't be what you are. It might be life, but not as we know it, Jim. >>> Yes, I see no reason that should make uploading impossible, in >>> theory, but we have no clue about how the mind works, so there could >>> be plenty of reasons it won't work. Add to that the enormous quantum >>> leap (or multiple quantum leaps) in technology, before being able to >>> even physically replicate it. But with the religious, once I try that >>> conversational track, I am shouted down and bood. =( >> >> >> IM-possible, no - but you're not just gonna do some >> kind of fancy MRI and transport a "mind" into any >> one or any thing. > > Come on! You're being so negative. Show some faith!! ;) For me, the > big problem is that we don't (yet) know how to mind works and even > what consciousness is, so how can we replicate it? > We have done precisely that in creating computers. They mimic our logical processes. >>> So basically, they extrapolate from 1 + 1 = 2, to a billion trillion >>> and often handwave away the steps in between. That is what makes some >>> of them religious in my opinion. >> >> It's the 'hand-wave' thing that sunk the first AI paradigm. >> Marv Minsky (who posted on usenet for awhile) and friends >> saw how easily 'decisions' could be done with a transistor >> or two and assumed it would thus be easy to build an AI. >> AC Clarke used the Minsky optimism when fashioning the >> idea of "HAL". >> >> But it all imploded. Turned out there were billions of >> steps between input and that final, transistor-like, >> decision. A photo-lightswitch is not 'intelligent'. > > But now we have LLM:s! ;) What I find interesting is how different > people view them. I find the free ones you can play with online to be > incredibly boring. I use them as a kind of search engine on steroids > for stuff that is not important (for entertainment purposes). > I would not trust them for anything business, there I must check > manually to make sure all is correct. *shrug* many people used to look it up in the Bible. > > Then you have people who fall in love with their LLM. I find that > incredible! Would they have fallen in love with Eliza? Id fall in love with any AI that could actually understand me :-) >>>> As for "Robin Hoods" - there are many ways of looking >>>> at that paradigm. Who "deserves" what ... not so easy. >>> >>> Robin Hoods? You mean stealing from the government and giving to the >>> people? The eternal libertarian hero? >> >> Um ... more 'commie' hero .... > > Ahh... that spin of Robin Hood. It is not so good. =/ I read two of > the older editions Pyle and McFadden (I think) and there he seemed to > be more libertarian/anarchist than commie, always fighting the > state. Robin Hood, the Green man, Tom Bombadil, whatever, has always been a mythic country dweller who takes up the cause of the peasants against the ruling classes. He is a shadow of a pagan deity. The male spirit of the woods - of trees and forests and of the spring. The vital spirit that causes things to grow. The first appearance of the Robin Hood legend seems to be in Piers Plowman, a sort of Paleo-Marxist tract from 1370 or so where the whole book is an allegory of the fight for the working class (rural peasant in those days) against the king and the church. Definitely a 'fuck the kings deer! Whose king is he anyway? let's have some for ourselves' The only difference between libertarianism and communism, is when each gets to power. Libertariansims tends towards a small state and individual freedom whereas communism imposes an egalitarianism using the biggest possible State, in fact the ideal is to leave only the State and its employees. In communism you work for the state. In libertarianism you work for yourself -- In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act. - George Orwell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 15:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <550aa723-9077-3770-b8ea-2c4afcf77b54@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62780 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 20/12/2024 09:57, D wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>>>> just neurons involved. 'Mind' is an 'environment'. >>>> >>>> This is the truth! I like transhumanists as much as the next guy, but >>>> sometimes I think their technology optimists comes too close to religion >>>> for my comfort. >>> >>> Religions and related philosophies often think of >>> some kind of magical 'essence of being' that can >>> drift around. It's from the dark ages and beyond. >>> Great for horror movie plots though. >> >> So you don't think that we are all god, living in god, being gods parts and >> components? ;) >> > > Well that's Spinoza's hypothesis. I know! > What you term the material world is just 'God, made manifest' > > No more demented than any other metaphysical position. This is the truth! I'm not a subscriber, but I'm a fan of it, because it is nice, simple and avoids complexities. It can even work, depending on your definition of god, for materialists! =D >>> Quite often we see papers describing how any of dozens >>> of 'helper' cells are modulating neuron activity on >>> the large and small scale. Some have neuron-ish qualities >>> unto themselves. The big blob of meat is a UNIT. You can >>> digitize the fine state of every neuron and you'll just >>> get an infunctional MESS on the other end. >>> >>> It's kinda All Or Nothing. We're not built like >>> computers - 'evo-goo' instead. >>> >>> (hey, I *like* that term and officially claim it :-) >> >> Well, I see nothing that says we wouldn't be able to live in another kind >> of substrate if everything was simulated, but I find the >> philosophical questions of if it would really be _us_ more >> interesting (assuming it works, of > course). > > Well yes. The human experience seems to be that of a consciousness bolted on > to an unruly animal. And most religions seem to be a process of denying or > repressing that, whereas the happier people simply accept there are two > people inside them and try and reach an accommodation. Denyning or repressing? You sound so negative! ;) How about refining, distilling or enriching? Talking about accepting and accomodating almost sounds a bit Jungian. >> I'm in the camp believing that if everything worked, and you have an >> uploaded intelligence that for all intents and purposes acts like >> you, it wouldn't be you. I like conscious continuity, but many >> transhumanists do not require that or believe that. >> > The position is simply the old idea of 'soul' rehashed into IT terms. The > point is that there is the animal self, that it coexists with (or for you, > from whence consciousness emerges) > Without that bag of biochemistry you wouldn't be what you are. > > It might be life, but not as we know it, Jim. This is the truth! And even though transhumanists brand themselves as the scientific choice (TM), when you challenge them or question them, I feel as if you trigger their religious reflex. A lot of them like to pay a fortune to freeze themselves, with the slim hope of being revived. I don't know if anyone ever did some statistics on it, but I suspect that you might have greater success donating to your local church in order to get God on your side! ;) Do you debate transhumanists? Do they like you? And, do you like them? >>>> Yes, I see no reason that should make uploading impossible, in theory, >>>> but we have no clue about how the mind works, so there could be plenty of >>>> reasons it won't work. Add to that the enormous quantum leap (or multiple >>>> quantum leaps) in technology, before being able to even physically >>>> replicate it. But with the religious, once I try that conversational >>>> track, I am shouted down and bood. =( >>> >>> >>> IM-possible, no - but you're not just gonna do some >>> kind of fancy MRI and transport a "mind" into any >>> one or any thing. >> >> Come on! You're being so negative. Show some faith!! ;) For me, the >> big problem is that we don't (yet) know how to mind works and even >> what consciousness is, so how can we replicate it? >> > We have done precisely that in creating computers. They mimic our logical > processes. Mimic to a small extent, yes, replicate, no. It's a big difference, especially at scale. >>>> So basically, they extrapolate from 1 + 1 = 2, to a billion trillion and >>>> often handwave away the steps in between. That is what makes some of them >>>> religious in my opinion. >>> >>> It's the 'hand-wave' thing that sunk the first AI paradigm. >>> Marv Minsky (who posted on usenet for awhile) and friends >>> saw how easily 'decisions' could be done with a transistor >>> or two and assumed it would thus be easy to build an AI. >>> AC Clarke used the Minsky optimism when fashioning the >>> idea of "HAL". >>> >>> But it all imploded. Turned out there were billions of >>> steps between input and that final, transistor-like, >>> decision. A photo-lightswitch is not 'intelligent'. >> >> But now we have LLM:s! ;) What I find interesting is how different people >> view them. I find the free ones you can play with online to be >> incredibly boring. I use them as a kind of search engine on steroids >> for stuff that is not important (for entertainment purposes). >> I would not trust them for anything business, there I must check manually >> to make sure all is correct. > > *shrug* many people used to look it up in the Bible. > >> > >> Then you have people who fall in love with their LLM. I find that >> incredible! Would they have fallen in love with Eliza? > > Id fall in love with any AI that could actually understand me :-) Really? No aesthetical or haptical preferences? >>>>> As for "Robin Hoods" - there are many ways of looking >>>>> at that paradigm. Who "deserves" what ... not so easy. >>>> >>>> Robin Hoods? You mean stealing from the government and giving to the >>>> people? The eternal libertarian hero? >>> >>> Um ... more 'commie' hero .... >> >> Ahh... that spin of Robin Hood. It is not so good. =/ I read two of >> the older editions Pyle and McFadden (I think) and there he seemed to >> be more libertarian/anarchist than commie, always fighting the >> state. > > Robin Hood, the Green man, Tom Bombadil, whatever, has always been a mythic > country dweller who takes up the cause of the peasants against the ruling > classes. He is a shadow of a pagan deity. The male spirit of the woods - of > trees and forests and of the spring. The vital spirit that causes things to > grow. > > The first appearance of the Robin Hood legend seems to be in Piers Plowman, a > sort of Paleo-Marxist tract from 1370 or so where the whole book is an > allegory of the fight for the working class (rural peasant in those days) > against the king and the church. Very interesting, the lord of the rings guy I know, but the green man I will look up. > Definitely a 'fuck the kings deer! Whose king is he anyway? let's have some > for ourselves' > > The only difference between libertarianism and communism, is when each gets > to power. This is incorrect. The entire theory of property is a huge difference between them. > Libertariansims tends towards a small state and individual freedom whereas > communism imposes an egalitarianism using the biggest possible State, in > fact the ideal is to leave only the State and its employees. Your "only difference" threw me off there. I'd say this is quite a big difference and not the "only" difference. > In communism you work for the state. In libertarianism you work for yourself This is the truth as god intended! ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 17:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lslnhiFbe1iU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62778 |
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:57:38 +0100, D wrote: > But now we have LLM:s! What I find interesting is how different people > view them. I find the free ones you can play with online to be > incredibly boring. I use them as a kind of search engine on steroids for > stuff that is not important (for entertainment purposes). Brave added one to the search engine but I turned it off. Might as well go straight to reddit which seems to be heavily mined.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 22:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <76588b80-645c-e1bc-68bc-aa535b080b3c@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62790 |
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:57:38 +0100, D wrote: > >> But now we have LLM:s! What I find interesting is how different people >> view them. I find the free ones you can play with online to be >> incredibly boring. I use them as a kind of search engine on steroids for >> stuff that is not important (for entertainment purposes). > > Brave added one to the search engine but I turned it off. Might as well go > straight to reddit which seems to be heavily mined. > That's the thing. LLM:s for me, are good at summarizing articles, so instead of being "ai" they are just a nice complement to searching, and as long as they work and don't hallucinate, they save me some clicks. That's about it. Oh, and writing government policy documents. When doing that, their hallucinations are actually an asset! ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 12 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web