Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #64371 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-01-14 23:37 -0500 |
| Last post | 2025-01-17 10:48 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 389 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-14 23:37 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:10 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 23:29 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-16 05:03 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:58 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 11:18 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:12 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-17 07:35 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 23:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-17 12:20 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 00:46 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 07:05 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 03:20 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 08:17 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 19:37 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:39 +0100
Raspberry NAS, anyone? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-18 14:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-18 20:05 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:47 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-19 13:14 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 23:02 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 09:07 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:33 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 10:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 10:10 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 13:51 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 21:58 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 20:04 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-21 10:13 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 18:55 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:28 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-22 18:50 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-23 06:47 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 22:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 00:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 16:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 21:59 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-24 01:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-24 00:52 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-24 19:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:02 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:35 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 11:21 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-24 20:27 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:14 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 11:16 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 19:16 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 00:58 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:04 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 22:29 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 23:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:40 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 00:37 +0000
Maker spaces Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-23 02:17 +0000
Re: Maker spaces rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 04:50 +0000
Re: Maker spaces Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-23 13:38 +0000
Re: Maker spaces Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 01:48 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:46 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 16:32 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-24 06:22 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 09:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:36 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:41 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 21:38 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 04:56 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 20:34 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 05:07 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 03:10 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 09:15 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 08:58 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 15:08 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 17:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-23 13:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 09:05 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 15:06 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 10:15 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 15:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 17:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 22:07 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:53 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 19:30 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 07:50 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-21 09:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 21:53 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 19:42 -0500
Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-21 02:48 +0000
Re: Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 23:29 -0500
Re: Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-22 20:56 +0000
Re: Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 18:47 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-21 10:12 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-21 19:56 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 19:17 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 21:29 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:51 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 19:18 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 10:27 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 11:46 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 19:21 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 18:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 23:16 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 01:39 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:07 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-24 19:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 23:19 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 00:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:27 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:36 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:54 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:33 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:14 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:24 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 15:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:25 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:03 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 19:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 22:25 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:38 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 10:44 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 18:03 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:29 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:38 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:01 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:39 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 09:57 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 11:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:40 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:07 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:44 +0000
Political evolution (Libertarianism) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-26 00:36 +0000
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-26 05:31 +0200
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:36 -0500
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 19:25 +0000
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 11:44 +0100
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 19:33 +0000
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 09:55 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:32 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 03:33 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-26 03:49 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 21:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-26 18:30 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 00:42 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186283@ud0s4.net" <186284@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 00:03 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 05:53 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 01:22 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 18:54 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 22:20 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-28 05:36 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-28 02:24 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-28 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-28 21:23 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-28 23:11 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-29 03:45 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-29 04:23 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-29 06:02 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-28 20:28 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 21:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-29 07:22 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-29 15:14 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-28 23:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-29 15:19 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-28 16:20 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-29 15:12 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 01:15 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-30 05:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 01:01 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 10:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 10:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 18:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 05:08 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 18:43 +0100
Turn your Radio On Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-30 14:05 +0000
Re: Turn your Radio On D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 18:49 +0100
Re: Turn your Radio On rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-30 19:35 +0000
Re: Turn your Radio On D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 22:15 +0100
Re: Turn your Radio On rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 01:18 +0000
Re: Turn your Radio On D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:47 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 17:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-30 19:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 22:16 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 22:07 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 01:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 21:24 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:49 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 19:36 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 23:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 05:16 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:49 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:48 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 10:33 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 09:33 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 17:31 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-30 19:45 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-30 20:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 20:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 21:25 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 21:19 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-30 22:54 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 20:43 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:22 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-31 08:08 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 01:35 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-01-31 04:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-31 00:44 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-31 02:09 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-31 10:33 +0000
Turn Your Radio On ... Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-31 16:48 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 23:03 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-31 20:08 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:36 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-02-01 05:05 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-01 01:52 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-02-01 17:40 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 08:14 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-01 19:47 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-01 19:57 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-01 20:13 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 00:24 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-02 06:10 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 20:41 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-02 10:20 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 20:27 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 21:00 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-01 17:08 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-02 10:18 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 20:54 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-01 19:49 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-01 01:22 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:28 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 18:42 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 11:39 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-02 10:43 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 21:56 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-03 03:25 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-03 22:55 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-04 00:36 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-03 22:52 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:35 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:28 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 20:31 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 21:59 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 01:11 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 11:49 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:28 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 19:30 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 23:36 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:45 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 18:47 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 22:54 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-01 11:27 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-31 10:29 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-01 04:11 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 05:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-02 04:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-31 18:21 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 19:47 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-31 10:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-01 04:34 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:09 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:46 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 17:45 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 21:55 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 10:27 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:01 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:10 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:29 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:22 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:22 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:29 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:00 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:25 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:45 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 12:52 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 17:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:27 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:05 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:41 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 17:44 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 20:15 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 22:26 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-24 21:40 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:28 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 03:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:16 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 10:46 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:40 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:09 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:21 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:48 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 13:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 17:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:01 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 20:30 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 22:28 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 19:45 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-28 05:38 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-28 03:13 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 10:25 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-28 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 21:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 22:00 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:09 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:00 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 11:38 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 00:53 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:04 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:19 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:29 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 00:12 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 10:51 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-25 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:53 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:38 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:22 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:40 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 07:48 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-22 20:11 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 22:31 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-22 22:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 00:05 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 21:34 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:53 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 16:34 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 22:02 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-22 20:08 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 23:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 18:22 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:20 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:33 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 16:46 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-18 07:45 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:45 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-18 19:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-19 19:03 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 23:08 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:52 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 09:08 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-20 23:29 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 20:26 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 10:36 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:44 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 08:14 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 16:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 09:00 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 13:56 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 21:57 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:19 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 08:04 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-17 23:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 00:28 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:48 +0100
Page 19 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19] 20 Next page →
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-23 22:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d8d536e2-3940-b589-1608-f894124b7205@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64703 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 23/01/2025 15:53, D wrote: >> >>> SO ... where do you NEED speed and where do you NEED economy/volume ? >> >> For my use case I need maximum economy/volume, so SSDs are out. > > Fair enough, but at least you are making in informed choice This is the truth! And since I've worked in storage for many decades I also have connections that would help me to get incredibly detailed information. For disk statistics, the disk list at backblaze is a good starting point! https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-storage/resources/hard-drive-test-data Enjoy you disk fans! =D
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-22 20:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vmrj85$16674$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64653 |
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 21/01/2025 19:56, Rich wrote: >> For SSD's, writes occur to an "erased" flash block (typically much >> larger than a "disk sector" size used by the host) and given enough >> writes over a short enough timeframe the SSD controller can run out of >> "pre-erased" blocks to use, and when that happens write speed slows >> down to the rate that can be done when a "block erase" has to occur >> before the actual writes can hit the media. Note that this "block >> erase" can also invove moving any partially used data sectors out of >> the block into another block, creating a "write amplification" >> situation as well. > > One of the best ways to gain speed and longevity is to buy an SSD that > is way larger than you need. So it always has empty blocks available. And hope it has a decent block layer that spreads the writes around so no one part of the flash is written to more than any other parts. > And can do the block erases in background Most SSD's do erases in the background, so that they can have empty blocks waiting to absorb writes. But stream a large enough set of writes at the drive, and you can (for some drives) use up the queue of background erased blocks and then you see your write speed drop by a good amount because the block erases are now also part of the "write path" for your data heading at the drive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-22 23:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vms0h7$1965j$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64661 |
On 22/01/2025 20:08, Rich wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 21/01/2025 19:56, Rich wrote: >>> For SSD's, writes occur to an "erased" flash block (typically much >>> larger than a "disk sector" size used by the host) and given enough >>> writes over a short enough timeframe the SSD controller can run out of >>> "pre-erased" blocks to use, and when that happens write speed slows >>> down to the rate that can be done when a "block erase" has to occur >>> before the actual writes can hit the media. Note that this "block >>> erase" can also invove moving any partially used data sectors out of >>> the block into another block, creating a "write amplification" >>> situation as well. >> >> One of the best ways to gain speed and longevity is to buy an SSD that >> is way larger than you need. So it always has empty blocks available. > > And hope it has a decent block layer that spreads the writes around so > no one part of the flash is written to more than any other parts. > That is pretty much standard practice these days Its called 'wear levelling' >> And can do the block erases in background > > Most SSD's do erases in the background, so that they can have empty > blocks waiting to absorb writes. > ...Exactly... > But stream a large enough set of writes at the drive, and you can (for > some drives) use up the queue of background erased blocks and then you > see your write speed drop by a good amount because the block erases are > now also part of the "write path" for your data heading at the drive. ....that was precisely the point I was making. -- "If you don’t read the news paper, you are un-informed. If you read the news paper, you are mis-informed." Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-21 18:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <B8qdnReXr6_MsQ36nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64644 |
On 1/21/25 4:12 AM, D wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Jan 2025, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> On 1/20/25 3:53 PM, D wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> On 20/01/2025 09:30, D wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The Pi hat or OMV ? >>>>> >>>>> The pi, with directly connected spinning disks. Does the hat have >>>>> its own extra power supply? >>>> >>>> I've managed to get a P4 I think to run one spinning rust disk >>>> without extra power. >>>> Strictly it depends on the disk. >>>> The pi hat for 5 drives has an external 60W PSU >>> >>> Ahh, if it has an external PSU then there is no problem. Ideally, if >>> the pi hat for 5 drives is intended to accomodate 5 spinning drives, >>> it would be nice if it did so at full speeds. >> >> >> One review said the WRITEs were a little pokey, >> but not TOO bad. READs were apparently snappy. >> >> This is OK ... most stuff on HDDs is "write once / >> read more often". > > Hmm, do you have a link? What does "a little pokey" mean in terms of > writes? If it is only performance and latency related, then it is ok, > since the software will take care of a lot of that for me. > >>> Given that the server manufacturers seem to no longer want to produce >>> smaller, cheaper nodes, but only want to sell huge GPU machines, I'm >>> contemplating if it actually might not be possible to build a nice >>> archive solution on pi:s, spinning disks and a few cards at a good >>> price. >>> >>> To be continued... as the saying goes. >> >> Yep ... lemme get in and fool with my 5-drive unit >> a bit and I'll write a hands-on report. The price >> is good enough (the DRIVES are $$$ alas) > > Great! =) > >> Even without the SATA hat ... you CAN run a number >> of external USB 3.x drives from a Pi. Won't be as >> quick, but it works OK. > > My plan, if it works, is to pitch this to a company, so I think the USB > way, although ok for home use, would not be accepted. =( > >> And yea, I know what you mean about everybody trending >> towards "overkill" boxes/systems. Better $ margin I guess. >> Still no shortage of motherboards - so you can build >> your own "appropriate" boxes. > > This is the truth! I wonder if it would be possible to 3d print boxes > for custom components at a good price? If the pi-road works, I could > imagine a nice custom printed part of the chassi to enable nice plug and > pray replacement of pi:s! Just pull out a pi module, replace, and go! =) > >> For an NAS, it's the drive speeds that are kinda the >> limiting factor, so even a 'slow' motherboard won't >> hurt anything. It's all I/O-bound. > > As long as the reads and writes are taken care of I'm planning on using > some software defined storage solution to help me handle that. Maybe the > solution is to add a ssd as a cache or something, or split the data to > be written across several spinning disks. What worries me with flaky > storage is massive rebuilds. > > Hmm, is there a way to get Pi:s on a 10 Gb network? Or are they limited > to 1 Gb only? > >> The popular Sinology canned NAS units - 4/6/8/12 drive >> units with multiple network plugs - all use basically >> laptop-grade 'Celeron' grade processors. > > Synology are trying to enter the enterprise market! I encountered them > in a discussion with a university where they proposed to store 1 PB on > their biggest product. Since they use some kind of linux inside, they > had all kinds of weird limitations on the nr of files in the same > directory etc. Very strange, but it was enough to point at the > limitations to get the university to drop them like a hot potato! In the > end I did not win, because my customer references where too honest (it's > a great solution) vs the competition who obviously orchestrated their > customers (it's like having a friend who does everything for you, I > never touch the storage, the vendor does anything I ask). =( Well, let's > see how happy they are once the signature is on the dotted line. I had good luck with Sinology units. Enough features plus some perks. Software updates maybe every two or three months. Fair selection of software add-ons. They DO use some kind of Linux ... had to write a few little scripts and Python bits. Do NOT put those in the system parts of the drive or they'll be overwritten on your next update. I just made a share and kept my little system tweaks there. The GUI supports setting up on-boot/timed/conditional calls to scripts and stuff. Attached an external USB to the unit and ran a pgm to do backups of the Most Important stuff every night. For extra security I had it attach the USB drive just before starting and then disconnect it a little bit later - nothing for Vlad to see. The USB ports were like /dev/bus/040 or something - took a little while to FIND them. Python had enough to emulate plugging-in the drive and then un-plugging it. Not sure I have that code anymore alas ... I'm gonna dump a lot of backup sticks to my Pi NAS when it's ready so maybe I'll find it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-17 10:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <c5566698-c773-f380-c7f9-f07533de2a88@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64469 |
On Thu, 17 Jan 2025, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: > D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 16/01/2025 10:58, D wrote: >>>> This is the truth! I've seen it in a few laptops. But I don't know if they >>>> are energy efficient enough to make a huge difference. I get about 14 hours >>>> or so from my 1.5 year old laptop. If arm would bump that to 25 I'd >>>> seriously consider one! But last time I had a look, 1.5 years ago, the >>>> battery time on arm laptops was far from impressive. >>> >>> There is some limit in terms of how much charge needs to get moved around >>> how many transistors of at least a given size that relates ultimate MIPS per >>> watt to a figure independent of architecture. >>> >>> The original ARM used very few transistors and an extremely well optimised >>> instruction set to get the performance that it did at such low power. >>> >>> Arguably it is now in the same ballpark as a late model INTEL *86 or even >>> RISC chip. >> >> This would correspond well with what I see in the market. It's a shame. >> I'd like to see a cpu focused on low power consumption since laptops don't >> need all the power they have today for regular day to day use. I'd much >> rather have a slow laptop that lasts me 30-40 hours, than a monster that >> runs out of power after 8 hours. > > ARM SoCs for "ultra-low power" exist for things like smart watches, > laptop makers just don't use them. Note that the big screen on a > laptop is a major power draw too, although a very niche product > using a large eInk display with some of the new partial-update and > colour features might be useful for some people. Very interesting. Thank you for the information. As for eInk I haven't (yet) seen one that would be able to keep up with videos. If such a thing exists, it would be awesome! When I buy laptops I always try to get the lowest resolution I can, as well as to avoid touch screen, in order to increase the battery life. > Finding the minimum-power ARM chip able to run Linux would be an > interesting exercise. I gather Linux requires a minimum set of ARM > extensions, as well as an MMU, which may exclude many of the SoC > options intended for embedded applications. Software is as much of > the problem as hardware. I wonder if linux + modern work such as spreadsheets and audio/video calls would be possible on those minimum-power ARM chips or if they are too slow?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-17 10:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vmdbmh$8tl$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64500 |
On 17/01/2025 09:20, D wrote: > I wonder if linux + modern work such as spreadsheets and audio/video > calls would be possible on those minimum-power ARM chips or if they are > too slow? I do not know how true this is, but by suspicion is that if you could take a Pi and underclock it by about 1000, it might prove alarmingly economical Speradsheets would be no problem but processing video takes a shit load of CPU. -- "In our post-modern world, climate science is not powerful because it is true: it is true because it is powerful." Lucas Bergkamp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-17 16:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <901ce06c-7685-6af8-de05-b5ccc7e29b43@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64515 |
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 17/01/2025 09:20, D wrote: >> I wonder if linux + modern work such as spreadsheets and audio/video calls >> would be possible on those minimum-power ARM chips or if they are too slow? > > I do not know how true this is, but by suspicion is that if you could take a > Pi and underclock it by about 1000, it might prove alarmingly economical > > Speradsheets would be no problem but processing video takes a shit load of > CPU. Yes, this is the truth! And as web camera resolutions increase, it gets worse and worse.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-18 07:45 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <678acf95@news.ausics.net> |
| In reply to | #64500 |
D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2025, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >> ARM SoCs for "ultra-low power" exist for things like smart watches, >> laptop makers just don't use them. Note that the big screen on a >> laptop is a major power draw too, although a very niche product >> using a large eInk display with some of the new partial-update and >> colour features might be useful for some people. > > Very interesting. Thank you for the information. As for eInk I haven't > (yet) seen one that would be able to keep up with videos. If such a thing > exists, it would be awesome! No way with videos, but then I very rarely view them on a laptop anyway, so I'm more interested in things like reading/writing to Usenet. I gather the writing part has previously been shaky because eInk displays update slower than people type, but new ones can update one section of the display faster than refreshing the whole display, so you might be able to practically update around the cursor posiiton without such excessive lag. > When I buy laptops I always try to get the lowest resolution I can, as > well as to avoid touch screen, in order to increase the battery life. I'd have thought that most power is used to generate the light (from an OLED display or LCD backlight), so screen size would be more related to power usage than resolution. >> Finding the minimum-power ARM chip able to run Linux would be an >> interesting exercise. I gather Linux requires a minimum set of ARM >> extensions, as well as an MMU, which may exclude many of the SoC >> options intended for embedded applications. Software is as much of >> the problem as hardware. > > I wonder if linux + modern work such as spreadsheets and audio/video calls > would be possible on those minimum-power ARM chips or if they are too > slow? Well many are faster than the Pentium 1 PC I'm posting from now. Clock speeds of 250MHz for example, while using a fraction of the power from something like a Raspberry Pi Zero. This PC can do spreadsheets and probably low-fi audio calls, but not video. This is my thinking in saying the inability to use these ultra-low-power SoC chips for more general computing is a software problem. Unlike microcontrollers of old, these ARM-based things are matching and exceeding the specs of this PC that I'm using. The difference is that you can build most Linux software to run on a Pentium 1 with one compiler argument, but it appears to be difficult to build for these chips, and existing work is geared towards running a custom, or at least customised, programs. After thirty years minimum-power processors seem to have caught up with the minimum level of processing speed that I regularly find use for. Only by the fact that the architecture is wrong for existing software does that preclude me taking advantage of this advancement, because I don't want to try and rewrite tons of common x86 software to run on these embedded architectures. RAM is also a limitation, and since it's locked inside these SoCs you can't expand it. Again projects like Contiki OS chew up vastly less RAM than Linux while still offering networked applications and a graphical environment (in the old version). -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-18 11:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <46d7222e-9c04-9210-9d75-a397561f7078@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64542 |
On Fri, 18 Jan 2025, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: > D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Jan 2025, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>> ARM SoCs for "ultra-low power" exist for things like smart watches, >>> laptop makers just don't use them. Note that the big screen on a >>> laptop is a major power draw too, although a very niche product >>> using a large eInk display with some of the new partial-update and >>> colour features might be useful for some people. >> >> Very interesting. Thank you for the information. As for eInk I haven't >> (yet) seen one that would be able to keep up with videos. If such a thing >> exists, it would be awesome! > > No way with videos, but then I very rarely view them on a laptop > anyway, so I'm more interested in things like reading/writing to > Usenet. I gather the writing part has previously been shaky because > eInk displays update slower than people type, but new ones can > update one section of the display faster than refreshing the whole > display, so you might be able to practically update around the > cursor posiiton without such excessive lag. > >> When I buy laptops I always try to get the lowest resolution I can, as >> well as to avoid touch screen, in order to increase the battery life. > > I'd have thought that most power is used to generate the light > (from an OLED display or LCD backlight), so screen size would be > more related to power usage than resolution. My thinking was more pixels to update, more loads on the computer, coupled with some power to handle the touch aspect as well. But you are probably right. As for screen size, my favourite form factor is 11.6" which does not exist any longer. =( Only 13.3 inch or 14 now for general use laptops. >>> Finding the minimum-power ARM chip able to run Linux would be an >>> interesting exercise. I gather Linux requires a minimum set of ARM >>> extensions, as well as an MMU, which may exclude many of the SoC >>> options intended for embedded applications. Software is as much of >>> the problem as hardware. >> >> I wonder if linux + modern work such as spreadsheets and audio/video calls >> would be possible on those minimum-power ARM chips or if they are too >> slow? > > Well many are faster than the Pentium 1 PC I'm posting from now. > Clock speeds of 250MHz for example, while using a fraction of the > power from something like a Raspberry Pi Zero. This PC can do > spreadsheets and probably low-fi audio calls, but not video. > > This is my thinking in saying the inability to use these > ultra-low-power SoC chips for more general computing is a software > problem. Unlike microcontrollers of old, these ARM-based things are > matching and exceeding the specs of this PC that I'm using. The > difference is that you can build most Linux software to run on a > Pentium 1 with one compiler argument, but it appears to be > difficult to build for these chips, and existing work is geared > towards running a custom, or at least customised, programs. > > After thirty years minimum-power processors seem to have caught up > with the minimum level of processing speed that I regularly find > use for. Only by the fact that the architecture is wrong for > existing software does that preclude me taking advantage of this > advancement, because I don't want to try and rewrite tons of common > x86 software to run on these embedded architectures. > > RAM is also a limitation, and since it's locked inside these SoCs > you can't expand it. Again projects like Contiki OS chew up vastly > less RAM than Linux while still offering networked applications and > a graphical environment (in the old version). > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-18 19:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lv2dj5FouuaU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64560 |
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:45:21 +0100, D wrote: > My thinking was more pixels to update, more loads on the computer, > coupled with some power to handle the touch aspect as well. But you are > probably right. As for screen size, my favourite form factor is 11.6" > which does not exist any longer. =( Only 13.3 inch or 14 now for general > use laptops. I have one from the netbook era that is running Lubuntu. I also have a Eee PC that is even smaller. The manufacturers were feeling their way around looking for a size between laptops and tablets and that form factor lost. We bought some 10" tablets for development and they seemed awkward to me. The netbook wasn't that much bigger and had a real keyboard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 11:42 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <8f8b7762-d553-0429-c679-5d4a82b7e7c6@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64587 |
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:45:21 +0100, D wrote: > >> My thinking was more pixels to update, more loads on the computer, >> coupled with some power to handle the touch aspect as well. But you are >> probably right. As for screen size, my favourite form factor is 11.6" >> which does not exist any longer. =( Only 13.3 inch or 14 now for general >> use laptops. > > I have one from the netbook era that is running Lubuntu. I also have a Eee > PC that is even smaller. The manufacturers were feeling their way around > looking for a size between laptops and tablets and that form factor lost. > > We bought some 10" tablets for development and they seemed awkward to me. > The netbook wasn't that much bigger and had a real keyboard. I remember the Eee PC. It was very cute! People always asked me how I could stand working on a 11.6" laptop (Macbook air), but I kind of got used to it. I get strength from the fact that Linus Torvalds at one point in time also proclaimed that the Macbook air 11.6" was the perfect form factor for him!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 19:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lv50k2F7e8lU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64597 |
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:42:25 +0100, D wrote: > I remember the Eee PC. It was very cute! People always asked me how I > could stand working on a 11.6" laptop (Macbook air), but I kind of got > used to it. I wanted something I could throw into a motorcycle saddlebag and not worry about so I snapped one up when they came out. I sidelined it when it couldn't handle WSA2. Last year I put Q4OS on it. https://q4os.org/ It took a couple of tries when I got too greedy with what I selected for the install. Trinity worked. The original Xandros distro is discontinued.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 23:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <29c4efba-398f-3160-186f-d0f1949934d9@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64611 |
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:42:25 +0100, D wrote: > >> I remember the Eee PC. It was very cute! People always asked me how I >> could stand working on a 11.6" laptop (Macbook air), but I kind of got >> used to it. > > I wanted something I could throw into a motorcycle saddlebag and not worry > about so I snapped one up when they came out. I sidelined it when it > couldn't handle WSA2. Last year I put Q4OS on it. > > https://q4os.org/ > > It took a couple of tries when I got too greedy with what I selected for > the install. Trinity worked. The original Xandros distro is discontinued. I love the fact that old computers are still perfectly usable today! Sadly the batteries on my (or now, my fathers) two macbook airs are too bad for me to use them for business. One of them now serves as an audio player with some kind of USB amplifier thing my father bought in a hifi-store so it can drive his speakers. Works great!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 18:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <DySdnfChi-XtDRD6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64617 |
On 1/19/25 5:08 PM, D wrote: > > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2025, rbowman wrote: > >> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:42:25 +0100, D wrote: >> >>> I remember the Eee PC. It was very cute! People always asked me how I >>> could stand working on a 11.6" laptop (Macbook air), but I kind of got >>> used to it. >> >> I wanted something I could throw into a motorcycle saddlebag and not >> worry >> about so I snapped one up when they came out. I sidelined it when it >> couldn't handle WSA2. Last year I put Q4OS on it. >> >> https://q4os.org/ >> >> It took a couple of tries when I got too greedy with what I selected for >> the install. Trinity worked. The original Xandros distro is discontinued. > > I love the fact that old computers are still perfectly usable today! > Sadly the batteries on my (or now, my fathers) two macbook airs are too > bad for me to use them for business. > > One of them now serves as an audio player with some kind of USB > amplifier thing my father bought in a hifi-store so it can drive his > speakers. Works great! An "old/weak" WINDOWS laptop becomes a perfectly good LINUX laptop. So, don't be in a huge hurry to put yer old tech into the bin. It can live on. Mac ... um ... you're probably stuck with their OS - but even then they can be relegated to 2nd-tier services. Batteries ... check around. It's surprising how many odd laptop batts you can find. Had to replace one in an old laptop recently and the name-brand batt was on Amazon at a good price.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 09:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vml3qf$30ig3$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64621 |
On 19/01/2025 23:52, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > An "old/weak" WINDOWS laptop becomes a perfectly good > LINUX laptop. So, don't be in a huge hurry to put yer > old tech into the bin. It can live on. > Yes, but it wiill still be slow, have a limited screen and gobble electrons > Mac ... um ... you're probably stuck with their OS - but > even then they can be relegated to 2nd-tier services. > Macs run Linux OK. > Batteries ... check around. It's surprising how many odd > laptop batts you can find. Had to replace one in an old > laptop recently and the name-brand batt was on Amazon at > a good price. Yes. They are only batteries. -- Labour - a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich people by telling poor people that "other" rich people are the reason they are poor. Peter Thompson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 23:29 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing |
| Message-ID | <vmmm90$3gk1t$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64625 |
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:08:31 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Yes, but it wiill still be slow, have a limited screen and gobble > electrons Just the act of putting Linux on an old machine can often make it feel like a new machine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 20:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing |
| Message-ID | <PI2cnb26As1NahP6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64638 |
On 1/20/25 6:29 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:08:31 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> Yes, but it wiill still be slow, have a limited screen and gobble >> electrons > > Just the act of putting Linux on an old machine can often make it feel > like a new machine. Indeed ! Winders is just *WAY TOO* ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 10:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ac80cb0b-30e3-d544-552d-41567238dc7f@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64621 |
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 1/19/25 5:08 PM, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025, rbowman wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:42:25 +0100, D wrote: >>> >>>> I remember the Eee PC. It was very cute! People always asked me how I >>>> could stand working on a 11.6" laptop (Macbook air), but I kind of got >>>> used to it. >>> >>> I wanted something I could throw into a motorcycle saddlebag and not worry >>> about so I snapped one up when they came out. I sidelined it when it >>> couldn't handle WSA2. Last year I put Q4OS on it. >>> >>> https://q4os.org/ >>> >>> It took a couple of tries when I got too greedy with what I selected for >>> the install. Trinity worked. The original Xandros distro is discontinued. >> >> I love the fact that old computers are still perfectly usable today! Sadly >> the batteries on my (or now, my fathers) two macbook airs are too bad for >> me to use them for business. >> >> One of them now serves as an audio player with some kind of USB amplifier >> thing my father bought in a hifi-store so it can drive his speakers. Works >> great! > > > An "old/weak" WINDOWS laptop becomes a perfectly good > LINUX laptop. So, don't be in a huge hurry to put yer > old tech into the bin. It can live on. All of them run linux. I wouldn't touch a windows laptop with a 10 ft pole + rubber gloves! ;) > Mac ... um ... you're probably stuck with their OS - but > even then they can be relegated to 2nd-tier services. Runs linux. No problem there! =) > Batteries ... check around. It's surprising how many odd > laptop batts you can find. Had to replace one in an old > laptop recently and the name-brand batt was on Amazon at > a good price. This is good advice!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 18:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <TOSdnTA9MqP0ExD6nZ2dnZfqn_gAAAAA@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64611 |
On 1/19/25 2:03 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:42:25 +0100, D wrote: > >> I remember the Eee PC. It was very cute! People always asked me how I >> could stand working on a 11.6" laptop (Macbook air), but I kind of got >> used to it. > > I wanted something I could throw into a motorcycle saddlebag and not worry > about so I snapped one up when they came out. I sidelined it when it > couldn't handle WSA2. Last year I put Q4OS on it. > > https://q4os.org/ > > It took a couple of tries when I got too greedy with what I selected for > the install. Trinity worked. The original Xandros distro is discontinued. Had an eeePC for a long time - very handy. Ran MX. Then I dropped it off a ladder while trying to set an IP camera .......... :-(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 08:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <20250120081459.000018e7@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #64597 |
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:42:25 +0100 D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > I remember the Eee PC. It was very cute! People always asked me how I > could stand working on a 11.6" laptop (Macbook air), but I kind of > got used to it. > > I get strength from the fact that Linus Torvalds at one point in time > also proclaimed that the Macbook air 11.6" was the perfect form > factor for him! Still use my Eee 904HA (a 9" model) as a portable typewriter. Nobody but *nobody* solved the laptop-hinge problem like Asus did on those first couple Eee generations; solid as a rock. (Do miss my 12" Thinkpad X201 - just the right size for me, but no longer viable as a daily driver due to max. RAM issues; unfortunately, with every single webpage chewing up 50+ MB even with scripts disabled, you just end up swapping like nobody's business with only 4 GB; the 2nd- generation i5 doesn't help, either.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 19 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19] 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web