Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #69904

Re: Clear Linux Is Dead

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Clear Linux Is Dead
Date Fri, 25 Jul 2025 16:10:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization the-candyden-of-code
Lines 30
Message-ID <slrn1087as4.3ocjv.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink)
References <pan$67108$b2b095a3$3febe759$3139a376@linux.rocks> <j7ydnYKSD-45qB71nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <185576b30a14a40d$47081$1225503$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <105vlgj$115c7$3@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date Fri, 25 Jul 2025 16:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info dont-email.me; posting-host="cf6aff879284137e58a73fe304381752"; logging-data="1199879"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX194jjW5tP4Qn1S/ob46YRzRi4lVjVX4EO+LOoZVDHuj1Q=="
User-Agent slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:+DGxAaqKSvDyhG7EVTjEvXH9o38=
X-Face b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:693886 comp.os.linux.misc:69904

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote at 10:15 this Friday (GMT):
> On 25/07/2025 11:09, Farley Flud wrote:
[snip]
>> A GNU/Linux distro that makes this point clear is Exherbo, which amazingly
>> is still alive:
>> 
>> <https://www.exherbo.org/docs/>
>> 
>>  From the Exherbo manifesto:
>> 
>> "First of all you need to understand that using Exherbo is an active commitment.
>> We fully expect you to help with development or other parts of the project. In return
>> you get to have lots of fun, learn some new things and will generally have a much
>> easier time getting help as you already know the workflow in Exherbo."
>> 
>> All GNU/Linux distros need to demand the same commitment.
>> 
>> Ha, ha, ha, ha!  I can see the panties starting to twist on all the freeloaders!
>> 
> Well its a personal view, and is why I avoid distros like that.
>
> I want a stable desktop environment on a *86 computer, or a stable 
> server environment on an ARM SBC.



Same, I like some tinkering but at the end of the day I want something
that works. 'tis why I use Debian.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-07-20 16:37 +0000
  Re: Clear Linux Is Dead c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-07-25 03:43 -0400
    Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-07-25 10:09 +0000
      Re: Clear Linux Is Dead The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-25 11:15 +0100
        Re: Clear Linux Is Dead chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-07-25 07:23 -0500
        Re: Clear Linux Is Dead "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-07-25 14:35 +0200
          Re: Clear Linux Is Dead The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-25 14:20 +0100
            Re: Clear Linux Is Dead "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-07-25 19:55 +0200
            Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-07-25 18:49 +0000
              Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-07-25 20:25 +0000
        Re: Clear Linux Is Dead candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-07-25 16:10 +0000
      Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-07-25 20:23 +0000
        Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-07-26 09:36 +0000

csiph-web