Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #69904

Re: Clear Linux Is Dead

From candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Clear Linux Is Dead
Date 2025-07-25 16:10 +0000
Organization the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID <slrn1087as4.3ocjv.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink)
References <pan$67108$b2b095a3$3febe759$3139a376@linux.rocks> <j7ydnYKSD-45qB71nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <185576b30a14a40d$47081$1225503$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <105vlgj$115c7$3@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote at 10:15 this Friday (GMT):
> On 25/07/2025 11:09, Farley Flud wrote:
[snip]
>> A GNU/Linux distro that makes this point clear is Exherbo, which amazingly
>> is still alive:
>> 
>> <https://www.exherbo.org/docs/>
>> 
>>  From the Exherbo manifesto:
>> 
>> "First of all you need to understand that using Exherbo is an active commitment.
>> We fully expect you to help with development or other parts of the project. In return
>> you get to have lots of fun, learn some new things and will generally have a much
>> easier time getting help as you already know the workflow in Exherbo."
>> 
>> All GNU/Linux distros need to demand the same commitment.
>> 
>> Ha, ha, ha, ha!  I can see the panties starting to twist on all the freeloaders!
>> 
> Well its a personal view, and is why I avoid distros like that.
>
> I want a stable desktop environment on a *86 computer, or a stable 
> server environment on an ARM SBC.



Same, I like some tinkering but at the end of the day I want something
that works. 'tis why I use Debian.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-07-20 16:37 +0000
  Re: Clear Linux Is Dead c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-07-25 03:43 -0400
    Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-07-25 10:09 +0000
      Re: Clear Linux Is Dead The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-25 11:15 +0100
        Re: Clear Linux Is Dead chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-07-25 07:23 -0500
        Re: Clear Linux Is Dead "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-07-25 14:35 +0200
          Re: Clear Linux Is Dead The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-25 14:20 +0100
            Re: Clear Linux Is Dead "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-07-25 19:55 +0200
            Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-07-25 18:49 +0000
              Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-07-25 20:25 +0000
        Re: Clear Linux Is Dead candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-07-25 16:10 +0000
      Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-07-25 20:23 +0000
        Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-07-26 09:36 +0000

csiph-web