Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #69904
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Clear Linux Is Dead |
| Date | 2025-07-25 16:10 +0000 |
| Organization | the-candyden-of-code |
| Message-ID | <slrn1087as4.3ocjv.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <pan$67108$b2b095a3$3febe759$3139a376@linux.rocks> <j7ydnYKSD-45qB71nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <185576b30a14a40d$47081$1225503$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <105vlgj$115c7$3@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote at 10:15 this Friday (GMT): > On 25/07/2025 11:09, Farley Flud wrote: [snip] >> A GNU/Linux distro that makes this point clear is Exherbo, which amazingly >> is still alive: >> >> <https://www.exherbo.org/docs/> >> >> From the Exherbo manifesto: >> >> "First of all you need to understand that using Exherbo is an active commitment. >> We fully expect you to help with development or other parts of the project. In return >> you get to have lots of fun, learn some new things and will generally have a much >> easier time getting help as you already know the workflow in Exherbo." >> >> All GNU/Linux distros need to demand the same commitment. >> >> Ha, ha, ha, ha! I can see the panties starting to twist on all the freeloaders! >> > Well its a personal view, and is why I avoid distros like that. > > I want a stable desktop environment on a *86 computer, or a stable > server environment on an ARM SBC. Same, I like some tinkering but at the end of the day I want something that works. 'tis why I use Debian. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-07-20 16:37 +0000
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-07-25 03:43 -0400
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-07-25 10:09 +0000
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-25 11:15 +0100
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-07-25 07:23 -0500
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-07-25 14:35 +0200
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-25 14:20 +0100
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-07-25 19:55 +0200
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-07-25 18:49 +0000
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-07-25 20:25 +0000
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-07-25 16:10 +0000
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-07-25 20:23 +0000
Re: Clear Linux Is Dead Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-07-26 09:36 +0000
csiph-web