Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #1490

Re: Why these program need './'?

Show all headers | View raw

On 27/06/2011 23:42, blmblm@myrealbox.com wrote:
> In article<slrnj0gknf.7ds.unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca>,
> unruh<unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca>  wrote:
>> On 2011-06-26, Todd Carnes<toddcarnes@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> On Fri, 13 May 2011 13:02:52 +0200, David Brown wrote:
>>>
>>>> Typing "./" before programs in your current directory is hardly a
>>>> hardship - but if it is, put . in your $PATH if you want.  It's /your/
>>>> machine, and /your/ choice.
>>>
>>> It may not be a hardship, but it's certainly an annoyance.
>>
>> Why? You surely have your runnable programs in specific directories. JUt
>> put them into your path. Having runable probramms scattered all over
>> hell's half acre is even more of an annoyance.
>
> I guess if you don't do much code development that might be true,
> but, um, surely if you're writing code (including shell scripts),
> executing files in the current directory, or a nearby directory, is
> something you're going to do a lot?  I don't mind including the "./",
> and in fact it avoids any possible ambiguity, but the idea that *all*
> executables live in directories in $PATH seems -- wrong.  ?
>

A very common solution is to have /home/$USER/bin on your $PATH, and put 
symbolic links there that link to the real program.  The program itself 
doesn't have to be in a common bin directory (I agree that's impractical 
for code development).

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why these program need './'? fl <rxjwg98@gmail.com> - 2011-05-12 19:56 -0700
  Re: Why these program need './'? "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-05-12 23:11 -0400
    Re: Why these program need './'? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-05-13 04:23 +0000
      Re: Why these program need './'? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-05-13 10:29 +0000
      Re: Why these program need './'? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-05-13 13:02 +0200
        Re: Why these program need './'? Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-06-26 14:35 +0000
          Re: Why these program need './'? despen@verizon.net - 2011-06-26 19:10 -0400
          Re: Why these program need './'? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-06-27 09:52 +0000
            Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-27 21:42 +0000
              Re: Why these program need './'? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-27 22:59 +0100
              Re: Why these program need './'? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-06-28 08:46 +0200
                Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 15:50 +0000
              Re: Why these program need './'? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-06-28 10:02 +0100
                Re: Why these program need './'? Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2011-06-28 09:00 -0400
                Re: Why these program need './'? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-28 14:21 +0000
                Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 15:51 +0000
              Re: Why these program need './'? "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 18:19 -0400
                Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 19:54 +0000
  Re: Why these program need './'? Feranija <feranija@net...> - 2011-06-29 00:47 -0700

csiph-web