Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #1494
| From | Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Why these program need './'? |
| Date | 2011-06-28 09:00 -0400 |
| Organization | Institute for Regimented Whimsey |
| Message-ID | <iucja5011ib@news6.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <XI-dnQq7YuwsklDQnZ2dnUVZ8j2dnZ2d@lyse.net> <pan.2011.06.26.14.35.10@gmail.com> <slrnj0gknf.7ds.unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> <96sbqbF4fuU3@mid.individual.net> <87wrg6z5ux.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk> |
Richard Kettlewell wrote: >None of this is rocket science. > Rocket science is over rated anyway. All there is to rocket science is F = m * a Now getting a rocket up, especially like to the moon or another planet is more complicated, but that is rocket engineering. The Chinese discovered rockets almost 1000 years ago. There are bumper stickers where I live saying that my congressman _is_ a rocket scientist. Which is kind-of funny because he used to be a scientist (physicist) at Princeton, but not in the field of rockets. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 08:50:01 up 5 days, 22:21, 3 users, load average: 5.02, 4.95, 4.83
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Why these program need './'? fl <rxjwg98@gmail.com> - 2011-05-12 19:56 -0700
Re: Why these program need './'? "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-05-12 23:11 -0400
Re: Why these program need './'? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-05-13 04:23 +0000
Re: Why these program need './'? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-05-13 10:29 +0000
Re: Why these program need './'? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-05-13 13:02 +0200
Re: Why these program need './'? Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-06-26 14:35 +0000
Re: Why these program need './'? despen@verizon.net - 2011-06-26 19:10 -0400
Re: Why these program need './'? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-06-27 09:52 +0000
Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-27 21:42 +0000
Re: Why these program need './'? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-27 22:59 +0100
Re: Why these program need './'? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-06-28 08:46 +0200
Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 15:50 +0000
Re: Why these program need './'? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-06-28 10:02 +0100
Re: Why these program need './'? Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2011-06-28 09:00 -0400
Re: Why these program need './'? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-28 14:21 +0000
Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 15:51 +0000
Re: Why these program need './'? "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 18:19 -0400
Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 19:54 +0000
Re: Why these program need './'? Feranija <feranija@net...> - 2011-06-29 00:47 -0700
csiph-web