Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #1494

Re: Why these program need './'?

From Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Why these program need './'?
Date 2011-06-28 09:00 -0400
Organization Institute for Regimented Whimsey
Message-ID <iucja5011ib@news6.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <XI-dnQq7YuwsklDQnZ2dnUVZ8j2dnZ2d@lyse.net> <pan.2011.06.26.14.35.10@gmail.com> <slrnj0gknf.7ds.unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> <96sbqbF4fuU3@mid.individual.net> <87wrg6z5ux.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk>

Show all headers | View raw


Richard Kettlewell wrote:

>None of this is rocket science.
> 
Rocket science is over rated anyway. All there is to rocket science is

F = m * a

Now getting a rocket up, especially like to the moon or another planet
is more complicated, but that is rocket engineering. The Chinese
discovered rockets almost 1000 years ago.

There are bumper stickers where I live saying that my congressman _is_ a
rocket scientist. Which is kind-of funny because he used to be a
scientist (physicist) at Princeton, but not in the field of rockets.

-- 
  .~.  Jean-David Beyer          Registered Linux User 85642.
  /V\  PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A         Registered Machine   241939.
 /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey    http://counter.li.org
 ^^-^^ 08:50:01 up 5 days, 22:21, 3 users, load average: 5.02, 4.95, 4.83

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Why these program need './'? fl <rxjwg98@gmail.com> - 2011-05-12 19:56 -0700
  Re: Why these program need './'? "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-05-12 23:11 -0400
    Re: Why these program need './'? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-05-13 04:23 +0000
      Re: Why these program need './'? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-05-13 10:29 +0000
      Re: Why these program need './'? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-05-13 13:02 +0200
        Re: Why these program need './'? Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-06-26 14:35 +0000
          Re: Why these program need './'? despen@verizon.net - 2011-06-26 19:10 -0400
          Re: Why these program need './'? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-06-27 09:52 +0000
            Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-27 21:42 +0000
              Re: Why these program need './'? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-27 22:59 +0100
              Re: Why these program need './'? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-06-28 08:46 +0200
                Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 15:50 +0000
              Re: Why these program need './'? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-06-28 10:02 +0100
                Re: Why these program need './'? Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2011-06-28 09:00 -0400
                Re: Why these program need './'? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-28 14:21 +0000
                Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 15:51 +0000
              Re: Why these program need './'? "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 18:19 -0400
                Re: Why these program need './'? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 19:54 +0000
  Re: Why these program need './'? Feranija <feranija@net...> - 2011-06-29 00:47 -0700

csiph-web