Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #80492

Re: DUC[KT] tape

From rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups alt.unix.geeks, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: DUC[KT] tape
Date 2026-01-05 00:31 +0000
Message-ID <ms0f39F2l85U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (10 earlier) <JKmdneOUIq40DcT0nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrn10lja2q.22e1c.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <JKmdnR6UIq4CJMT0nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> <mructjFm7clU6@mid.individual.net> <10jdhbh$1u3ls$6@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, 4 Jan 2026 11:02:09 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 04/01/2026 05:42, rbowman wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 19:51:44 -0500, c186282 wrote:
>> 
>>>     Someone else suggested 'Germanic' ... but that may just be a
>>>     random association based on 'how it sounds'. Besides, the US
>>>     founders did not LIKE the Germans - they were mercenaries for the
>>>     Redcoats, and pretty nasty too.
>> 
>> The first German language newspaper in the colonies was published by
>> Ben Franklin.
>> 
> In anthropology 'Germanic' refers to a broad group of peoples who
> inhabited NW Europe at or about the time of the late Bronze age onwards
> 
> So Czechs, Dutch, Denmarks ,Swedes, swiss, flemish, Austrian as well as
> the English and Germans are all 'germanic'.
> 
> It was the Romans, who encountered the Germanii, who coined the term to
> refer largely to 'anyone who doesn't speak Latin'

Varus, give me back my legions!

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-29 05:31 -0500
  Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-29 11:25 -0500
    Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2026-01-01 14:29 +1100
      Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-01 13:22 +0000
        Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-01 23:22 -0500
          Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-02 07:29 +0000
            Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-02 06:08 -0500
              Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-03 01:34 +0000
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-02 21:19 -0500
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-03 21:55 +0000
          Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-01-02 11:45 +0100
            Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-02 06:16 -0500
              Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2026-01-02 17:10 +0000
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-02 14:55 -0500
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-01-02 22:07 +0100
              Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-01-02 22:19 +0100
              Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-03 01:42 +0000
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-02 21:21 -0500
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2026-01-03 08:46 +0000
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-01-03 14:35 +0100
                Re: Sun Position (was Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ?) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-03 22:00 +0000
      Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2026-01-01 14:50 +0000
        Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-02 02:22 -0500
          DUC[KT] tape Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-01-02 14:48 +0000
            Re: DUC[KT] tape Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-01-02 14:56 +0000
              Re: DUC[KT] tape c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-02 10:21 -0500
                Re: DUC[KT] tape rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-03 01:58 +0000
              Re: DUC[KT] tape Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2026-01-05 11:28 +1100
                Re: DUC[KT] tape Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-01-06 13:32 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-01-07 02:14 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-06 22:42 -0500
                Re: DUC[KT] tape Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-01-07 06:33 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-07 09:33 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-07 18:45 -0500
                Re: DUC[KT] tape Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2026-01-09 12:13 +1100
                Re: DUC[KT] tape rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-10 02:52 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-01-10 10:20 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-10 20:07 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-10 20:45 -0500
                Re: DUC[KT] tape rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-11 06:02 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-11 01:30 -0500
                Re: DUC[KT] tape rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-11 22:17 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2026-01-16 12:32 +1100
                Re: DUC[KT] tape The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-11 12:04 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape vs Gaffer tape Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-01-07 14:40 +0000
            Re: DUC[KT] tape c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-02 10:16 -0500
              Re: DUC[KT] tape rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-03 01:59 +0000
            Re: DUC[KT] tape rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-03 01:48 +0000
              Re: DUC[KT] tape c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-02 21:39 -0500
                Re: DUC[KT] tape The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-03 08:42 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-03 07:09 -0500
                Re: DUC[KT] tape The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-03 13:58 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-03 21:35 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-03 16:56 -0500
                Re: DUC[KT] tape The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-03 23:01 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-01-03 23:38 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-03 19:51 -0500
                Re: DUC[KT] tape rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-04 05:42 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-04 11:02 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-05 00:31 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-04 10:56 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape "Worst Case"@dizum.com - 2026-01-04 19:05 +0100
                Re: DUC[KT] tape "Worst Case"@dizum.com - 2026-01-04 21:07 +0100
                Re: DUC[KT] tape Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-03 23:41 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-03 20:31 -0500
                Re: DUC[KT] tape Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-04 10:48 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-04 10:53 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-04 10:52 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-04 06:05 +0000
                Re: DUC[KT] tape Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-01-03 14:26 +0000
      Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-01 19:21 +0000
        Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-02 02:56 -0500
          Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2026-01-03 00:50 +1100
          Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-03 01:21 +0000
          Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-01-05 12:44 +0100
      Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-01 21:48 +0000
        Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? "Rinaldi J. Montessi" <rinaldij@alien.free> - 2026-01-01 17:23 -0600
          Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-01 23:56 +0000
            Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-01-02 02:18 +0000
              Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-02 05:02 +0000
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-01-02 06:04 +0000
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-02 21:27 +0000
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-01-03 00:18 +0000
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-02 21:44 -0500
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-01-03 06:09 +0000
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-03 08:41 +0000
                Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-01-05 12:52 +0100
          Re: This Is a Job For - Polarizing Film ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-02 07:25 +0000

csiph-web