Re: Ummm ... US Govt Planning to "Nationalize" Intel

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: Ummm ... US Govt Planning to "Nationalize" Intel
Date	20 Aug 2025 18:28:15 GMT
Lines	25
Message-ID	<mgmiduF93agU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<SgednXpDhYWi_Tj1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net Wm0TNbBGt8FHPhFXtA9xyQYmepMbNBgNLgMzqHehaIIj4hiYTD
Cancel-Lock	sha1:wqswEBg2A6SfjXPaPmkrVMM5nuY= sha256:Q0DeNc5ngj9bCA5TJkEIhC0ec1+DfaPZ/hInLNoqnO4=
User-Agent	Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:71771

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 01:42:22 -0400, c186282 wrote:

> And IF I buy another mini-box/lap anytime soon, I WILL still go with an
> Intel CPU. Still have TWO spares right now ... one dedicated to nothing
> and one in the box (with Win-11 by default). But, near future,
> ya never know. HAVE used AMDs and they're GOOD ... but .........

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/08/ars-technica-system-guide-back-to-
pc-building-for-back-to-school/

I haven't been keeping up so I don't know what Intel's current socket 
selections are but he claims AM5 is more future-proof. AM4 lasted almost 
10 years and you can still get processors. LGA 1200 was quickly followed 
by LGA 1700 and now LGA 1851.  

My Intel box has a LGA 1150, which had a pretty good run. It was followed 
by LGA 1151. I'm curious what the extra pin was for.

I keep looking at the Antec case under the bench and thinking I should do 
a build. but it's huge with those big drive bays that would need to be 
adapted down. It was designed for a ATX mobo but I never did use all the 
slots. A microATX would do.

Then I'd have another box and could install the vastly superior Mint 
Linux. Only fooling -- I'd probably go for Leap.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Ummm ... US Govt Planning to "Nationalize" Intel c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-20 01:42 -0400
  Re: Ummm ... US Govt Planning to "Nationalize" Intel "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-20 12:13 +0200
    Re: US Govt Planning to “Nationalize” Intel Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-24 02:34 +0000
      Re: US Govt Planning to “Nationalize” Intel "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-24 20:28 +0200
      Re: US Govt Planning to “Nationalize” Intel Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-08-24 19:19 +0000
        Re: US Govt Planning to “Nationalize” Intel The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-25 12:16 +0100
          Re: US Govt Planning to “Nationalize” Intel Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-25 21:17 +0000
  Re: Ummm ... US Govt Planning to "Nationalize" Intel rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-20 18:28 +0000

csiph-web