Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #71771
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Ummm ... US Govt Planning to "Nationalize" Intel |
| Date | 2025-08-20 18:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mgmiduF93agU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <SgednXpDhYWi_Tj1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 01:42:22 -0400, c186282 wrote: > And IF I buy another mini-box/lap anytime soon, I WILL still go with an > Intel CPU. Still have TWO spares right now ... one dedicated to nothing > and one in the box (with Win-11 by default). But, near future, > ya never know. HAVE used AMDs and they're GOOD ... but ......... https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/08/ars-technica-system-guide-back-to- pc-building-for-back-to-school/ I haven't been keeping up so I don't know what Intel's current socket selections are but he claims AM5 is more future-proof. AM4 lasted almost 10 years and you can still get processors. LGA 1200 was quickly followed by LGA 1700 and now LGA 1851. My Intel box has a LGA 1150, which had a pretty good run. It was followed by LGA 1151. I'm curious what the extra pin was for. I keep looking at the Antec case under the bench and thinking I should do a build. but it's huge with those big drive bays that would need to be adapted down. It was designed for a ATX mobo but I never did use all the slots. A microATX would do. Then I'd have another box and could install the vastly superior Mint Linux. Only fooling -- I'd probably go for Leap.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Ummm ... US Govt Planning to "Nationalize" Intel c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-20 01:42 -0400
Re: Ummm ... US Govt Planning to "Nationalize" Intel "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-20 12:13 +0200
Re: US Govt Planning to “Nationalize” Intel Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-24 02:34 +0000
Re: US Govt Planning to “Nationalize” Intel "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-24 20:28 +0200
Re: US Govt Planning to “Nationalize” Intel Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-08-24 19:19 +0000
Re: US Govt Planning to “Nationalize” Intel The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-25 12:16 +0100
Re: US Govt Planning to “Nationalize” Intel Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-25 21:17 +0000
Re: Ummm ... US Govt Planning to "Nationalize" Intel rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-20 18:28 +0000
csiph-web