Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #68955

Re: Soft Versus Hard Process Limits

From rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Soft Versus Hard Process Limits
Date 2025-06-20 20:33 +0000
Message-ID <mbluslF9qfoU5@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <1032nsn$e9r1$1@dont-email.me> <YYCdnQmyx8fzcsn1nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:19:49 -0400, c186282 wrote:


>    Beware of what 'top' tells you. Seeing 100+ percent CPU use is common
>    - but the load is actually split over more than one cores.
> 
>    Determining REAL load can sometimes be a bit tricky in Linux.

'I' will toggle between the Irix and Solaris modes. 

"Also  for  multi-processor environments, if Irix mode is Off, top will 
operate in Solaris mode where a task's cpu usage will be divided by the 
total  number of CPUs.  You toggle Irix/Solaris modes with the `I' 
interactive command."

"System Monitor' on Ubuntu has a toggle and defaults to dividing; top 
defaults to Irix. He may not have had 'Show All Processes' set in System 
Monitor but a person in r/Ubunutu couldn't figure out what was bogging 
down the machine. top showed it was a service for video/gaming. 

'1' in top will show usage by core, although it's not the most intuitive 
presentation.  htop has a better presentation as far as cores but isn't as 
straight forward for processes. 

I hate to say it but Windows tools are a bit more polished.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Soft Versus Hard Process Limits Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-20 04:26 +0000
  Re: Soft Versus Hard Process Limits c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-20 01:19 -0400
    Re: Soft Versus Hard Process Limits rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-20 20:33 +0000

csiph-web