Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #68955
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Soft Versus Hard Process Limits |
| Date | 2025-06-20 20:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mbluslF9qfoU5@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <1032nsn$e9r1$1@dont-email.me> <YYCdnQmyx8fzcsn1nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:19:49 -0400, c186282 wrote: > Beware of what 'top' tells you. Seeing 100+ percent CPU use is common > - but the load is actually split over more than one cores. > > Determining REAL load can sometimes be a bit tricky in Linux. 'I' will toggle between the Irix and Solaris modes. "Also for multi-processor environments, if Irix mode is Off, top will operate in Solaris mode where a task's cpu usage will be divided by the total number of CPUs. You toggle Irix/Solaris modes with the `I' interactive command." "System Monitor' on Ubuntu has a toggle and defaults to dividing; top defaults to Irix. He may not have had 'Show All Processes' set in System Monitor but a person in r/Ubunutu couldn't figure out what was bogging down the machine. top showed it was a service for video/gaming. '1' in top will show usage by core, although it's not the most intuitive presentation. htop has a better presentation as far as cores but isn't as straight forward for processes. I hate to say it but Windows tools are a bit more polished.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Soft Versus Hard Process Limits Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-20 04:26 +0000
Re: Soft Versus Hard Process Limits c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-20 01:19 -0400
Re: Soft Versus Hard Process Limits rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-20 20:33 +0000
csiph-web