Re: Compiler utility

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	vallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: Compiler utility
Date	7 Feb 2025 04:11:02 GMT
Lines	32
Message-ID	<m0lfelFquhsU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<vo3u4t$37omt$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net SSbyNIwD4kSPRSHkewNp6ASKteJTEpLaLtSIAGCc8SxlqA8AYy
Cancel-Lock	sha1:vOUDj9qiGb61x+4HKO370WAeFUE= sha256:zCWD4UUlTCVqVwb5MU2kvUbdjXl1oo3S/5/tFgf6R98=
X-Face	+McU)#<-H?9lTb(Th!zR`EpVrp<0)1p5CmPu.kOscy8LRp_\u`:tW;dxPo./(fCl CaKku`)]}.V/"6rISCIDP`
User-Agent	Pan/0.161 (Hmm2; b3261289; Linux-6.13.1)
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:65241

Show key headers only | View raw

On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 03:19:58 -0000 (UTC), root <NoEMail@home.org> wrote in
<vo3u4t$37omt$1@dont-email.me>:

> The latest gcc compiler is 14.2, or something like that.
> I have used prior versions 11.2 and 12.2 which allow C code that does
> not always type routines, such as int main()
> 
> Since the original compiler, it was understood that the default for a
> routine is type int, so that a compiler would accept
>  
> main()
> 
> and, although it might give a nuisance warning the program would compile
> and run.
> 
> The latest gcc seems to require every routine to be typed. As of the
> current time, I have 1,046,000 lines of C code written over the last 45
> years or so, and much of it was written according to K&R.
> 
> Does anyone know of a compiler add-on which will read existing code, and
> insert type (int) when the routine is not explicitly given?
> 
> 
> Thanks.

You can probably get the code to compile with the
proper "--std=" directive to gcc.

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.13.1 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
   "If things get any worse, I'll have to ask you to stop helping me."

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Compiler utility root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-02-07 03:19 +0000
  Re: Compiler utility vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-07 04:11 +0000
    Re: Compiler utility rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-07 06:05 +0000
    Re: Compiler utility root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-02-07 17:35 +0000
      Re: Compiler utility vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-07 17:51 +0000
      Re: Compiler utility The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-07 22:28 +0000
        Re: Compiler utility Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-02-07 22:44 +0000
          Re: Compiler utility Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-08 03:30 +0000
          Re: Compiler utility The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 13:12 +0000
        Re: Compiler utility root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-02-09 04:51 +0000
  Re: Compiler utility Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-07 06:02 +0000
    Re: Compiler utility "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-07 01:06 -0500
  Re: Compiler utility Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-07 08:42 +0000
    Re: Compiler utility root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-02-07 17:49 +0000
      Re: Compiler utility Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-07 20:16 +0000
        Re: Compiler utility root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-02-07 22:19 +0000

csiph-web