Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #65269

Re: Compiler utility

From The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Compiler utility
Date 2025-02-08 13:12 +0000
Organization A little, after lunch
Message-ID <vo7l89$25uo$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <vo3u4t$37omt$1@dont-email.me> <m0lfelFquhsU4@mid.individual.net> <vo5g9e$3jith$1@dont-email.me> <vo61ed$3mh03$1@dont-email.me> <vo62cg$3hkjs$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/02/2025 22:44, Lew Pitcher wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 22:28:29 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> On 07/02/2025 17:35, root wrote:
>>> when the compiler encountered the line
>>>
>>> int main(argc,argv)
>>>
>>> it threw up an error.
>>
>> Well did you have
>> {
>> char *argv[]; int argc;
>>
>> ...underneath?
> 
> itym
>    char *argv[]; int argc;
>    {
> 
> as in
>    /* K&R C style function */
>    int main(argc,argv)
>    char *argv[]; int argc;
>    {
>     /*... */
>     return 0;
>    }
> 
>   :-)
> 
Yup. I fully adopted the 'definitions inside the function brackets' 
years ago and forgotted (sic!) the exact syntax.

-- 
All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that 
all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is 
fully understood.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Compiler utility root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-02-07 03:19 +0000
  Re: Compiler utility vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-07 04:11 +0000
    Re: Compiler utility rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-07 06:05 +0000
    Re: Compiler utility root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-02-07 17:35 +0000
      Re: Compiler utility vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-07 17:51 +0000
      Re: Compiler utility The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-07 22:28 +0000
        Re: Compiler utility Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-02-07 22:44 +0000
          Re: Compiler utility Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-08 03:30 +0000
          Re: Compiler utility The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 13:12 +0000
        Re: Compiler utility root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-02-09 04:51 +0000
  Re: Compiler utility Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-07 06:02 +0000
    Re: Compiler utility "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-07 01:06 -0500
  Re: Compiler utility Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-07 08:42 +0000
    Re: Compiler utility root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-02-07 17:49 +0000
      Re: Compiler utility Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-07 20:16 +0000
        Re: Compiler utility root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-02-07 22:19 +0000

csiph-web