Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #1305

Re: at syntax

From Kevin Snodgrass <kdsnodgrass@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: at syntax
Date 2011-06-01 04:31 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <is4fbu$ve8$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <94i4ppF634U1@mid.individual.net> <is46v2$k2d$1@dont-email.me> <94lnoaF7lqU3@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:50:50 +0000, General Schvantzkoph wrote:

> Using multiple queues is a good idea, thanks I'll add that. It sounds

You're welcome...

I use queue names that have some relevance to the type of job.  Queue 's' 
is for Speed Channel (mostly F1 Races), 'w' is for web related (I wget 
some volatile webpages at various times of day), 'f' for football, etc..

Not all of my jobs are to schedules tv recordings.  I think I typically 
have 6-10 jobs/day, M-F and 3-6 weekends.  Some jobs do many things.

> like I'll just have to use my wrapper script to solve the same day
> problem.

Guess I don't understand the problem then.  Is there a reason why you 
can't run the schedule script on sunday, to schedule for the entire week?

> I have another question. Is there a switch to get atq to give you
> details of the scheduled job?

Well, not atq, since atq is an alias for at -q.  But the actual command 
does.  Try:

at -c <job number>|less

You get a bunch of environment related stuff in there too.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-30 18:08 +0000
  Re: at syntax Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-05-30 16:04 -0400
    Re: at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-30 23:16 +0000
  Re: at syntax Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-05-31 09:44 +0100
    Re: at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-31 12:37 +0000
      Re: at syntax Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-05-31 14:54 +0100
        Re: at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-31 18:52 +0000
          Re: at syntax Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-06-02 21:03 +0100
            Re: at syntax dave.gma+news002@googlemail.com.invalid (Dave Gibson) - 2011-06-02 22:24 +0100
              Re: at syntax Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-06-03 09:34 +0100
                Re: at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-03 13:21 +0000
                Re: at syntax Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-06-03 15:46 +0100
  Re: at syntax Kevin Snodgrass <kdsnodgrass@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 02:08 +0000
    Re: at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 02:50 +0000
      Re: at syntax Kevin Snodgrass <kdsnodgrass@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 04:30 +0000
      Re: at syntax Kevin Snodgrass <kdsnodgrass@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 04:31 +0000
      Re: at syntax Kevin Snodgrass <kdsnodgrass@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 04:31 +0000
      Re: at syntax Kevin Snodgrass <kdsnodgrass@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 04:30 +0000

csiph-web