Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #1295
| From | General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: at syntax |
| Date | 2011-05-31 18:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <94krmhF7lqU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <94i4ppF634U1@mid.individual.net> <0dmeb8xqa8.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk> <94k5nhF7lqU1@mid.individual.net> <1h8fb8xbmc.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk> |
On Tue, 31 May 2011 14:54:09 +0100, Chris Davies wrote: > General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> wrote: >> I wrote a wrapper that checks the day and fixes it, but I would prefer >> if there was a way for at to do the right thing itself, > > As far as I can tell from the requirement in your original post, "at" > does do the right thing itself. > > at -V > at version 3.1.12 > > # Assuming it's now midday, > at 10pm today # tonight > at 9am today # fails, because 9am has already happened > > I must admit that I don't understand, given you want something to happen > "today", why you are loathe to use the "today" qualifier. > > With regards to your scriptlet you pasted, isn't this fundamentally the > same as something like this? > > at 2200 `date +'%e %b %Y'` # 10pm today, with explicit date > > Chris It's a general purpose script to schedule captures of TV shows using an HDHOMERUN box. If it were a one time thing then using TODAY would be OK, but it's something that might be executed on any day of the week. I don't want to have to edit it every time I run it.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-30 18:08 +0000
Re: at syntax Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-05-30 16:04 -0400
Re: at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-30 23:16 +0000
Re: at syntax Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-05-31 09:44 +0100
Re: at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-31 12:37 +0000
Re: at syntax Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-05-31 14:54 +0100
Re: at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-31 18:52 +0000
Re: at syntax Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-06-02 21:03 +0100
Re: at syntax dave.gma+news002@googlemail.com.invalid (Dave Gibson) - 2011-06-02 22:24 +0100
Re: at syntax Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-06-03 09:34 +0100
Re: at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-03 13:21 +0000
Re: at syntax Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2011-06-03 15:46 +0100
Re: at syntax Kevin Snodgrass <kdsnodgrass@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 02:08 +0000
Re: at syntax General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 02:50 +0000
Re: at syntax Kevin Snodgrass <kdsnodgrass@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 04:30 +0000
Re: at syntax Kevin Snodgrass <kdsnodgrass@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 04:31 +0000
Re: at syntax Kevin Snodgrass <kdsnodgrass@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 04:31 +0000
Re: at syntax Kevin Snodgrass <kdsnodgrass@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-01 04:30 +0000
csiph-web