Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #72856
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix5.panix.com!qz!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: All Hail The Great Netpbm! |
| Date | Mon, 1 Sep 2025 01:28:39 -0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | Some absurd concept |
| Message-ID | <eli$2508312128@qaz.wtf> (permalink) |
| References | <pan$eb21a$33bc4305$5a938f74$e121755e@linux.rocks> <87a53lvkuu.fsf@atr2.ath.cx> <slrn10au81t.25i.bencollver@utopia.localdomain> <108o4br$vok4$12@dont-email.me> |
| Injection-Date | Mon, 1 Sep 2025 01:28:39 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix5.panix.com:166.84.1.5"; logging-data="970"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" |
| User-Agent | Vectrex rn 2.1 (beta) |
| X-Liz | It's actually happened, the entire Internet is a massive game of Redcode |
| X-Motto | "Erosion of rights never seems to reverse itself." -- kenny@panix |
| X-US-Congress | Moronic Fucks. |
| X-Attribution | EtB |
| XFrom | is a real address |
| Encrypted | double rot-13 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:72856 |
Show key headers only | View raw
In comp.os.linux.misc, Lawrence DOliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 15:11:41 -0000 (UTC), Ben Collver wrote: >> On 2025-08-26, jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> wrote: >>> Can't ImageMagick take over for netpbm? Frankly I'm surprised it still >>> compiles. I'm not knocking it - just surprised it's still getting love >>> after all these years. netpbm has working documentation unlike Imagemagick >> On the contrary, simpler code should be easier to compile and to port. Besides documentation, I like the pbm formats (pbm for monochrome, pgm for grayscale, ppm for RGB, pam for more complicated things) as interchange when writing my own tools to stick in a processing pipeline. Imagemagick, being a monolith, does not cope with user tools well. > But conversely, netpbm has not been updated for modern features like deep > pixels. ??? https://deep-pixels.com/ Elijah ------ admits the pam formats have not gotten much love
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: All Hail The Great Netpbm! jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2025-08-26 17:22 -0400
Re: All Hail The Great Netpbm! Ben Collver <bencollver@tilde.pink> - 2025-08-27 15:11 +0000
Re: All Hail The Great Netpbm! Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-27 23:29 +0000
Re: All Hail The Great Netpbm! Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2025-09-01 01:28 +0000
Re: All Hail The Great Netpbm! Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-01 02:58 +0000
Re: All Hail The Great Netpbm! c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-09-01 03:07 -0400
csiph-web