Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #36956
| Path | csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:49:53 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| References | <ciSdnWwhx5UI8H3-nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com> <trrvh2$37v18$1@bluemanedhawk.eternal-september.org> <NXOdnTl4775jRHz-nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <trtlgd$3oork$3@dont-email.me> |
| From | "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> |
| Date | Wed, 8 Feb 2023 01:49:52 -0500 |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <trtlgd$3oork$3@dont-email.me> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Message-ID | <ea2cnfgWouaM237-nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
| Lines | 77 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 68.222.41.46 |
| X-Trace | sv3-fY4MxlQCaeP9C7BynAtVksR8N7KhiV13sjuScosNA2f5DIpsaycWvmbrS9KIgGytflQUt4I9M1QyJvP!HgUOcXwlZQnDCDQA6+IazMEj3iI3hVfqSCd8p6aF9sgPUTeNkEtJAIA/wXUwdfJy4ypjBzPtTjxo!dZ6Pv/EiWIsgvQ83qoU= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:36956 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2/7/23 8:59 AM, Rich wrote: > 26C.Z968 <26C.Z968@noaada.net> wrote: >> On 2/6/23 5:38 PM, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote: >>> >>> ?Meh. I'm still pretty apathetic to machine learning. It's >>> consistently less effective to brute-force solutions with ML than to >>> determine the solutions through clever, creative, wise human >>> thought. >> >> Alas, I think that's starting to change. The "AI"s seem more savvy >> at "Lego" programs - taking a vague-ish description of what's >> needed and stacking functional modules together to achieve the >> effect. >> >> With 64-bit processors and loads of cheap RAM/storage that may put >> them over the top. Doesn't matter if it's less efficient, so long >> as the "AI"s are CHEAPER THAN HUMAN PROGRAMMERS WHO USE ALL THOSE >> TERMS NOBODY UNDERSTANDS TO THWART YOUR GOALS OF SELLING >> SUPERCRAPWARE AND RISING IN THE COMPANY. > > What is more likely to happen is the AI's will allow an entire > population of people who can't create a program now (even stringing > 'modules' together in Bash) to create programs. The results will > likely be rough and dirty, but for those folks will mostly achieve > their desired goal (provided everything aligns properly). Oh, I understand (won't be TOO long before nobody does) - BUT, if SuperCrapWare is super-CHEAPWare, with no annoying and expensive humans in the loop anymore, it WILL prevail. That's economics. > I.e., AI will allow all the Excel jockeys to actually create more than > 'Excel programs'. > > For the more crafted programs that do more than "abort" when their > inputs don't match *exactly* their expectations, those will likely still > require someone with actual programming skill to create them. I think the "AI" programs are already a bit beyond such problems. It's just a matter of sticking the right "Lego" bits together. Removing expensive and annoying humans from software development is a sort of Holy Grail for the management types. They want it, the economics favor it, so it WILL BE - probably sooner than you think. BIG MONEY entities like MS/Goog are behind this 101% Ah, today, it's announced BING will be incorporating ChatGPT utility very soon. No longer JUST a "search engine", but an "engine of creation" too. This is barely a few WEEKS since the news that M$ had greatly increased its ownership in ChatGPT ..... So, what ELSE can be turned into ChatGPT "creative narratives" ??? Not just programming. I suspect it will be a major component in all the bots that replace idiot/costly human workers. The point ALWAYS ignored ... if you put all the humans out of a job, who's gonna BUY what your "AI" systems produce - from McBurgers on up ??? I have a suspicion that there's a "dead zone", a point where you CAN'T get from a human-labor economy to an "AI"-labor-based economy. Not enough human money left to push the "AI" stuff into practical existence. MIGHT be kinder-n-gentler ways around that, but real corps ain't gonna use them. Oh well, I'll get my MediCare and SS cards in just a short time. I'll be The Voting Group they all have to cater to - and yes I'm a paying AARP member. But what about the REST of you - esp the 30s/40s/50s segment ????????
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-05 22:01 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2023-02-06 03:42 +0000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-06 00:31 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2023-02-06 18:18 +0000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-06 23:33 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2023-02-07 05:50 +0000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-09 21:22 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2023-02-10 18:59 +0000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-10 19:17 +0000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-11 03:21 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2023-02-11 18:07 +0000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST "24B.R869" <26B.R869@noaaada.net> - 2023-02-11 23:08 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2023-02-06 04:34 +0000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-06 00:52 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2023-02-06 18:17 +0000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-08 03:02 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 17:38 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-06 23:54 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2023-02-07 13:59 +0000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-08 01:49 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2023-02-08 19:15 +0000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2023-02-08 11:39 +0000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2023-02-09 04:49 +1000
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST "26C.Z968" <26C.Z968@noaada.net> - 2023-02-08 22:22 -0500
Re: ChatGPT *Can Write Code* ... And MS $$$ Will Push It Further FAST Tramiv <Tramiv@doe.com> - 2023-02-08 19:46 +0000
csiph-web