Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #694
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: linux raid vs hw raid |
| From | Tris Orendorff <triso@remove-me.cogeco.ca> |
| References | <fc0t68x5ci.ln2@goaway.wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> <dmft68-2q8.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> <Xe-dnXd4LLb1gwHQnZ2dnUVZ7sWdnZ2d@lyse.net> <kr0v68xq47.ln2@goaway.wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> <tllsp6ltftsq6ufp048hcc4ivufupgbmki@4ax.com> |
| Message-ID | <Xns9EC58F37B7D8RepublicPicturesLtd@69.16.185.250> (permalink) |
| Date | 2011-04-12 18:04 +0000 |
Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> burped up warm pablum in news:tllsp6ltftsq6ufp048hcc4ivufupgbmki@4ax.com: > > Swap space? RAID10 is best for that, from my reading. Got to be > careful with swap reliability because bad swap will crash the machine > and possibly eat your data. Same as bad memory. Swap space? Isn't that useless for a server? We've found it next-to-useless on our desktops even with the fastest SSDs. -- Tris Orendorff [ Anyone naming their child should spend a few minutes checking rhyming slang and dodgy sounding names. Brad and Angelina failed to do this when naming their kid Shiloh Pitt. At some point, someone at school is going to spoonerise her name. Craig Stark ]
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-05 19:39 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-04-06 08:01 +0100
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-04-06 10:03 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-06 14:00 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-04-06 23:42 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-08 10:45 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-04-08 11:12 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-08 08:22 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-09 09:51 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-08 17:10 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-04-09 13:14 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-09 09:47 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-04-09 13:55 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tris Orendorff <triso@remove-me.cogeco.ca> - 2011-04-12 18:04 +0000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-12 11:34 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-12 21:13 +0100
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-04-13 09:45 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-14 13:42 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-04-14 09:15 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-15 08:03 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-04-15 07:22 +0100
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-04-15 09:28 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-19 11:20 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-14 13:38 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-13 21:49 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-14 13:34 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tris Orendorff <triso@remove-me.cogeco.ca> - 2011-04-15 21:59 +0000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-usenet2@hjp.at> - 2011-04-16 00:56 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-16 01:32 +0100
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2011-04-08 21:38 +0300
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-09 09:53 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid KR <kristian.rasmussen@broadpark.no.spam.com> - 2011-04-09 11:56 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-09 10:32 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-10 11:12 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-09 18:59 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid KR <kristian.rasmussen@broadpark.no.spam.com> - 2011-04-10 04:32 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-10 12:46 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-09 20:39 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-04-10 03:47 +0000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Balwinder S Dheeman <bsd.SANSPAM@anu.homelinux.net> - 2011-04-10 11:11 +0530
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-09 23:29 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Balwinder S Dheeman <bsd.SANSPAM@anu.homelinux.net> - 2011-04-10 14:05 +0530
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-10 20:16 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-04-10 11:28 +0100
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Balwinder S Dheeman <bsd.SANSPAM@anu.homelinux.net> - 2011-04-10 19:43 +0530
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-04-12 03:44 +0000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Balwinder S Dheeman <bsd.SANSPAM@anu.homelinux.net> - 2011-04-12 13:56 +0530
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-10 20:09 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-04-12 03:37 +0000
csiph-web