Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #747
| From | Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: linux raid vs hw raid |
| Followup-To | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Date | 2011-04-15 07:22 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <3s4l78-6vi.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <io2bp3$9sk$1@news.albasani.net> <XcSdnU4wVYejyTjQnZ2dnUVZ8o-dnZ2d@lyse.net> <h2rcq6hvcf8rbb0rigptkf6alrtfhsvqp7@4ax.com> <-NmdnSetarUCAzvQnZ2dnUVZ8hKdnZ2d@lyse.net> <35qeq61o56nifjseocj5jf7c3h1k6snjv8@4ax.com> |
Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.misc
Grant wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:15:32 +0200, David Brown > Don't leave a saturated /tmp space! >> >>(Note that /var/tmp should really survive a reboot. However, I have >>never heard of any programs that actually rely on that - but no >>guarantees. /tmp should always be safe on tmpfs.) > > Hmm, I don't do anything special for /var/tmp, but on a slack-11.0 box > been up 16 days, it's empty. ON the 'pooh' box above, it's got old crap > surviving boot for KDE, 2.2MB for a single user, wonder why? I tend > towards wanting to flush that one on boot too, or make it in tmpfs. What I do is cron a find ... | xargs rm that kills off anything with an atime *and* mtime more than a few days old. It would work well enough for mtime alone if you have "notime" on. Cheers Tim -- Tim Watts
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-05 19:39 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-04-06 08:01 +0100
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-04-06 10:03 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-06 14:00 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-04-06 23:42 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-08 10:45 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-04-08 11:12 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-08 08:22 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-09 09:51 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-08 17:10 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-04-09 13:14 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-09 09:47 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-04-09 13:55 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tris Orendorff <triso@remove-me.cogeco.ca> - 2011-04-12 18:04 +0000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-12 11:34 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-12 21:13 +0100
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-04-13 09:45 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-14 13:42 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-04-14 09:15 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-15 08:03 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-04-15 07:22 +0100
Re: linux raid vs hw raid David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-04-15 09:28 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-19 11:20 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-14 13:38 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-13 21:49 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-14 13:34 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tris Orendorff <triso@remove-me.cogeco.ca> - 2011-04-15 21:59 +0000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-usenet2@hjp.at> - 2011-04-16 00:56 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-16 01:32 +0100
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2011-04-08 21:38 +0300
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-09 09:53 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid KR <kristian.rasmussen@broadpark.no.spam.com> - 2011-04-09 11:56 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-09 10:32 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-10 11:12 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-09 18:59 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid KR <kristian.rasmussen@broadpark.no.spam.com> - 2011-04-10 04:32 +0200
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-10 12:46 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-09 20:39 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-04-10 03:47 +0000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Balwinder S Dheeman <bsd.SANSPAM@anu.homelinux.net> - 2011-04-10 11:11 +0530
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-04-09 23:29 -0700
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Balwinder S Dheeman <bsd.SANSPAM@anu.homelinux.net> - 2011-04-10 14:05 +0530
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-10 20:16 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-04-10 11:28 +0100
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Balwinder S Dheeman <bsd.SANSPAM@anu.homelinux.net> - 2011-04-10 19:43 +0530
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-04-12 03:44 +0000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Balwinder S Dheeman <bsd.SANSPAM@anu.homelinux.net> - 2011-04-12 13:56 +0530
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-10 20:09 +1000
Re: linux raid vs hw raid Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-04-12 03:37 +0000
csiph-web