Re: why must initrd 'track' vmlinuz ?

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Helmut@Hullen.de (Helmut Hullen)
Newsgroups	alt.os.linux.slackware, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: why must initrd 'track' vmlinuz ?
Date	03 Apr 2011 19:37:00 +0200
Organization	Hullen BS
Lines	29
Message-ID	<Bj8n5cET1uB@helmut.hullen.de> (permalink)
References	<in9tpo$cns$1@dont-email.me> <ina2ct$tuh$1@news.xmission.com> <Bj8mn+ei1uB@helmut.hullen.de> <t5CdnS8oDJzCMAXQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@posted.localnet>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace	individual.net 8BnGZGNV2bbHbVtIcRtoMgyGUVBdJ6VtayLCdAuQe9D0OeAYYO
Cancel-Lock	sha1:nBRV1cuj+sSsyl09D2Q0sy+c/mQ=
User-Agent	OpenXP/4.10.7372 (Win32) (i386)
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.misc:588

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Hallo, Robert,

Du meintest am 03.04.11:

>>> The "modular" kernel requires an initrd.

>> No - "that depends".
>>
>> You can build a kernel with some "built in" modules for booting into
>> runlevel 1, and all the modules only needed in higher runlevels (6
>> excluded) can be loaded without the help of an init-ramdisk.

> Right, the typical 'stock' kernel has the base IDE driver and ext2
> file system modules compiled in.  So, if you have an (old?) IDE
> system disk and only use an ext2 file system on the root file system,
> you don't need an initrd.  OTOH, for SATA, SCSI, RAID, and LVM, as
> well as ext3, you need an initrd.

No - I run a (self made) kernel 2.6.38.1 which uses P-ATA, S-ATA and  
SCSI, without any init-ramdisk. Filesystems: ext2, ext3, btrfs. No  
problems.

The configuration is based on the "huge" slackware kernel.

Viele Gruesse
Helmut

"Ubuntu" - an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

why must initrd 'track' vmlinuz ? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-04-03 13:47 +0000
  Re: why must initrd 'track' vmlinuz ? Douglas Mayne <none@invalid.com> - 2011-04-03 15:06 +0000
    Re: why must initrd 'track' vmlinuz ? Helmut@Hullen.de (Helmut Hullen) - 2011-04-03 17:15 +0200
      Re: why must initrd 'track' vmlinuz ? Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2011-04-03 12:24 -0500
        Re: why must initrd 'track' vmlinuz ? Helmut@Hullen.de (Helmut Hullen) - 2011-04-03 19:37 +0200
          Re: why must initrd 'track' vmlinuz ? Mark Hobley <markhobley@yahoo.donottypethisbit.co> - 2011-04-29 12:40 +0000
  Re: why must initrd 'track' vmlinuz ? unruh <unruh@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca> - 2011-04-03 15:30 +0000
  Re: why must initrd 'track' vmlinuz ? buck <buck@private.mil> - 2011-04-03 20:01 +0000

csiph-web