Re: Age verification

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: Age verification
Date	Fri, 3 Apr 2026 13:21:44 +0200
Lines	32
Message-ID	<8fk4amx33e.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References	<10qmblj$1aj1o$2@dont-email.me> <2a3b8622f4de22ac9eb7edc85773eb41@dizum.com> <10qmst1$1gi7e$1@dont-email.me> <bmg3amx7gq.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10qnv24$1qj4s$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net rxYgK7QBHAv7MzcXvt+qGAUxi5gJYJdpk3+01CyaBL8aQBOBQh
X-Orig-Path	Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock	sha1:flzTwYYzi0vOGbzy8Ty6OS5pgTo= sha256:VQN0npB3slIWlqcGeY/a9IA1Gev368Pl1p40lgLbNeM=
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language	es-ES, en-CA
In-Reply-To	<10qnv24$1qj4s$1@dont-email.me>
X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host	127.0.0.1
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:85266

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2026-04-03 10:51, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 03/04/2026 02:11, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>> On 2026-04-03 01:08, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>>> On Thu,  2 Apr 2026 23:41:21 +0200 (CEST), Worst Case wrote:
>>>
>>>> The worry is that, while they're verifying your age, they're
>>>> verifying dozens of other things and conveying all of it (for a
>>>> price) to your content provider.
>>>
>>> Which is why the age verifier must be an independent authority.
>>>
>>> There are already Government departments whose job it is to collect
>>> personal information about you, that includes your date of birth: e.g.
>>> tax department, social welfare. Any one of those could also be the
>>> age-verification authority, without any additional risk to your
>>> personal information.
>>
>> My government doesn't need to collect any such information. They 
>> already know. Earlier than me, in fact.
>>
> Gotta lurve the EU
> 

Not related at all. They have been doing that maybe for centuries, only 
that now they have the technology to get the info instantly.

Actually, the EU ruled protections for the citizens that we did not have 
before, limits to the use of that information.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Age verification Anthk <bozo@dev.null> - 2026-04-02 13:44 +0000
  Re: Age verification Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-04-02 17:42 +0200
    Re: Age verification Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-02 18:14 +0000
      Re: Age verification "Worst Case"@dizum.com - 2026-04-02 23:41 +0200
        Re: Age verification Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-04-02 23:08 +0000
          Re: Age verification "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-03 03:11 +0200
            Re: Age verification The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 09:51 +0100
              Re: Age verification "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-03 13:21 +0200
    Re: Age verification The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 19:38 +0100
  Re: Age verification Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-02 16:22 +0000
    Re: Age verification gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-04-02 16:54 +0000
      Re: Age verification Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-02 18:10 +0000
        Re: Age verification Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-04-02 19:41 +0000
          Re: Age verification Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-04-02 20:48 +0000
      Re: Age verification The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 19:41 +0100
    Re: Age verification The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 19:40 +0100
  Re: Age verification "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-02 21:54 +0200
  Re: Age verification kouya <kouyaheika@canithesis.org> - 2026-04-07 00:08 -0500

csiph-web