Re: M$ 365 Down, Again

Message-ID	<67a67a1d@news.ausics.net> (permalink)
From	not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Subject	Re: M$ 365 Down, Again
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
References	(18 earlier) <vo239p$2tjs1$1@dont-email.me> <67a51b61@news.ausics.net> <9IudneM3jY3V4zj6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <67a59caa@news.ausics.net> <pb6cnXX0VOSoPTj6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Date	2025-02-08 07:24 +1000
Organization	Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net

Show all headers | View raw

WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
> On 2/7/25 12:39 AM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>> WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
>>> On 2/6/25 3:28 PM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 06/02/2025 03:19, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>>> Anyway, sorry, I just CAN'T see any sort of useful
>>>>>>      and safe vacuum blimp. One goose bumps into the
>>>>>>      thing and it will all implode in an instant.
>>>>>>
>>>>> This is substantially correct. The strength to weigh ratio of a vacuum
>>>>> filled  blimp or dirigible means it probably cannot exist at any useable
>>>>> size
>>>>
>>>> If you can make small vacuum balls that float in the air, you
>>>> could potentially fill a blimp with them instead of gas. Or
>>>> instead of one hollow vacuum chamber, join the balls (or honeycomb
>>>> segments) up into one solid lighter-than-air structure of tiny
>>>> sealed vacuum chambers where only the outer ones are vulnerable
>>>> to impact.
>>>
>>>    But ONE little dent compromising the structural
>>>    integrity and ......
>> 
>> And the rest of the sealed balls/segments still keep the thing up,
>> that was my point.
> 
>   But they WON'T ... implosions can be quite violent.
>   If one goes it'll be a chain reaction.

That might be. Or it might be possible to avoid that with the right
design, depending on the nature of the material. It'd be an
interesting challenge if the materials were around to start with,
although you'd still have the old problem of airships/blimps being
easily blown about in strong winds.

Note that pieces of such a light material wouldn't have much
mass compared to materials used in regular vacuum chambers, so
the impact force of bits flying around from an implosion would be
less than commonly experienced.

-- 
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-29 20:24 -0500
  Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 10:34 +0100
  Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-01-30 10:50 +0000
    Re: M$ 365 Down, Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 11:00 +0000
      Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 18:44 +0100
        Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-31 15:26 +0100
          Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-31 16:20 -0500
            Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 23:49 +0100
              Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-31 20:30 -0500
            Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-02-01 13:07 +0000
          Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 23:00 +0100
            Re: M$ 365 Down, Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 05:25 +0000
              Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-01 01:54 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-02-01 14:45 +0100
              Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:39 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-02-01 14:47 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 15:32 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-02-01 16:00 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 11:39 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 20:41 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-02 20:46 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 22:01 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 22:00 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 19:38 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-01 19:58 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-01 20:40 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 11:45 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-02 17:03 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 21:58 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-02 21:50 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-02 22:36 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-03 22:53 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-04 05:46 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-04 09:36 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:37 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-03 22:52 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-03 22:09 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-04 05:31 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:30 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 21:29 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-03 22:55 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-03 22:17 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:31 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-05 07:02 +1000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-05 01:33 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2025-02-04 23:54 -0800
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-02-05 11:18 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-05 22:19 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-06 10:35 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-07 06:28 +1000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-06 22:30 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-02-07 15:39 +1000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-07 00:55 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-08 07:24 +1000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-02-07 16:19 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-07 17:38 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-07 10:22 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-07 12:42 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-06 22:09 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-02-06 23:53 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-06 23:27 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-07 10:23 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-05 11:04 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 10:38 -0800
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-02-03 20:27 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-03 23:15 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-04 05:35 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-04 09:41 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-02-04 13:07 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:39 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-03 23:14 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-04 00:36 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-03 22:56 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-02-05 09:54 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-05 19:32 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-05 22:23 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-06 04:50 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-06 00:45 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-02-06 18:12 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-06 20:38 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-06 23:13 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-02-06 18:10 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:29 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-03 22:48 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-04 05:54 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:35 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 11:44 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 20:45 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 22:01 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 21:26 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-03 04:17 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-03 01:29 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-03 09:45 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-03 09:08 -0500
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-03 22:54 +0100
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 19:36 +0000
                Re: M$ 365 Down, Again D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 11:42 +0100
              Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-02-01 14:44 +0100
      Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-01-31 13:35 +0000
    Re: M$ 365 Down, Again "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 06:14 -0500
      Re: M$ 365 Down, Again Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-01-30 12:27 +0000

csiph-web