Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #63097

Re: Linux upgrade.

From D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Linux upgrade.
Date 2024-12-26 16:42 +0100
Organization i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID <47b5927b-009e-64b0-383b-0de6005cae2f@example.net> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <9b186526-edd5-2a87-ea25-de228dcb6c9d@example.net> <rLGcncoT5MkvXvH6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com> <slrnvmpk1m.3lf0o.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <lt43raFkkjsU8@mid.individual.net> <q6204lxjnu.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>

Show all headers | View raw



On Thu, 26 Dec 2024, Carlos E.R. wrote:

> On 2024-12-26 05:19, rbowman wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 03:40:38 -0000 (UTC), Lars Poulsen wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2024-12-26, 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
>>>>     The death of OpenSUSE is that it's part of the IBM/RHEL vortex now,
>>>>     just like CentOS. Using it, you're basically an unpaid beta tester
>>>>     for IBM. Eventually they won't need that so much - and that entire
>>>>     distro family will just go away.
>>> 
>>> Are you saying that RedHat has bought SUSE?
>>> I see no reference to this in the Wikipedia articles about SuSE and
>>> openSUSE.
>> 
>> It's hard to keep track of the shell game from Novell to Attachmate to
>> MicroFocus but I believe EQT AB has it now, at least the Enterprise.
>> 
>> https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/german-software-firm-suse-be-taken-
>> private-by-eqt-16-euros-per-share-2023-08-17/
>> 
>> I don't know if OpenSUSE is upstream of SLE like Rawhide/Fedora are
>> upstream of RHEL. No particular reason but I missed the leap from 13.2 to
>> Leap and eventually went to Fedora on that box.
>
> openSUSE (not OpenSUSE) Tumbleweed is loosely upstream of SLE, and SLE is the 
> basis (package compatible) of Leap.
>
> The next SLE has been delayed for about two years, I think. The new design is 
> taking longer than they thought.
>
> https://news.opensuse.org/2024/10/07/leap-16-0-prealpha/
>
>
> There were talks of using containers, but I'm unsure of the name.
>
> "Just for clarification SLFO, SUSE Linux Framework One, is the source pool 
> for SLES 16 and SL Micro 6.X. SLFO was previously known as Adaptable Linux 
> Platform (ALP)."
>
>
> https://www.suse.com/c/revolutionizing-linux-distributions-with-an-adaptable-linux-platform/
>
> https://www.suse.com/c/suse-salp-raises-the-bar-on-confidential-computing/
>
> https://www.muylinux.com/2024/01/15/opensuse-leap-16-alp/

I was reading up on opensuse 16 yesterday and it seems that 16 will let 
you do container based read only root, and regular read/write root. Since 
I like to make modifications and not have to restart, I'll happily take 
the classic version. Seems like opensuse leap will live on for all of 
version 16 at least! =)

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Linux upgrade. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 22:21 +0100
  Re: Linux upgrade. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-23 22:30 +0100
    Re: Linux upgrade. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:57 +0100
  Re: Linux upgrade. John McCue <jmccue@qball.jmcunx.com> - 2024-12-23 22:04 +0000
    Re: Linux upgrade. Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-23 22:52 +0000
      Re: Linux upgrade. John McCue <jmccue@qball.jmcunx.com> - 2024-12-24 00:23 +0000
        Re: Linux upgrade. Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-24 00:27 +0000
          Re: Linux upgrade. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-24 02:08 +0000
            Re: Linux upgrade. Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-24 02:24 +0000
              Re: Linux upgrade. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-24 03:04 +0000
                Re: Linux upgrade. Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-24 05:50 +0000
                Re: Linux upgrade. Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-24 08:19 +0000
            Re: Linux upgrade. John McCue <jmccue@qball.jmcunx.com> - 2024-12-24 20:05 +0000
    Re: Linux upgrade. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 14:03 +0100
  Re: Linux upgrade. "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 01:31 -0500
    Re: Linux upgrade. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:26 +0100
      Re: Linux upgrade. "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 01:14 -0500
        Re: Linux upgrade. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:42 +0100
    Re: Linux upgrade. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:21 +0000
      Re: Linux upgrade. "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 02:15 -0500
        Re: Linux upgrade. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-25 21:30 +0000
          Re: Linux upgrade. "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:54 -0500
  Re: Linux upgrade. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-26 07:02 +1000
    Re: Linux upgrade. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 23:08 +0100
      Re: Linux upgrade. "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 21:47 -0500
        Re: Linux upgrade. Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-26 03:40 +0000
          Re: Linux upgrade. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:19 +0000
            Re: Linux upgrade. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:57 +0100
            Re: Linux upgrade. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-26 14:27 +0100
              Re: Linux upgrade. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 16:42 +0100
          Re: Linux upgrade. Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-26 08:14 +0000
          Re: Linux upgrade. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:52 +0100
          Re: Linux upgrade. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-26 14:04 +0100
        Re: Linux upgrade. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:37 +0100

csiph-web