Re: DAEMON Tools vs daemontools

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject	Re: DAEMON Tools vs daemontools
Date	Wed, 6 May 2026 09:40:43 -0700
Organization	A place where nothing fits quite right
Lines	8
Message-ID	<20260506094043.00006c6d@gmail.com> (permalink)
References	<10tdrak$p9bu$1@dont-email.me> <87a4ucld4g.fsf@atr2.ath.cx>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Wed, 06 May 2026 16:40:48 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; logging-data="1326271"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+6RRDJ8wEWvRpVKT65ER7I6XuSQvzoZI="; posting-host="8fe7595861e993358a3bc8817a1c8179"
Cancel-Lock	sha1:xa4q7zjSQEiw1IM9uatuIz8ar/w= sha256:NYDbcLBCqFnxUM6dOiJC9zQcYBhkkTk0UOApYjLyTgk= sha1:H8BQxVcxWyU7f/4lXNWV+uLpLng=
X-Newsreader	Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:86182 alt.comp.os.windows-11:31753

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, 06 May 2026 12:24:47 -0400
jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> wrote:

> Why the Windows one uses the term "daemon" when it has nothing to do
> with daemons I don't know.

L337 points, basically. It was 2005, all the kewl k1dz were doing it :/

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

DAEMON Tools vs daemontools Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-05 22:35 +0000
  Re: DAEMON Tools vs daemontools Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-05-05 19:22 -0400
  Re: DAEMON Tools vs daemontools jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-05-06 12:24 -0400
    Re: DAEMON Tools vs daemontools John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-05-06 09:40 -0700

csiph-web