Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #86182
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: DAEMON Tools vs daemontools |
| Date | 2026-05-06 09:40 -0700 |
| Organization | A place where nothing fits quite right |
| Message-ID | <20260506094043.00006c6d@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <10tdrak$p9bu$1@dont-email.me> <87a4ucld4g.fsf@atr2.ath.cx> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Wed, 06 May 2026 12:24:47 -0400 jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> wrote: > Why the Windows one uses the term "daemon" when it has nothing to do > with daemons I don't know. L337 points, basically. It was 2005, all the kewl k1dz were doing it :/
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
DAEMON Tools vs daemontools Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-05 22:35 +0000
Re: DAEMON Tools vs daemontools Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-05-05 19:22 -0400
Re: DAEMON Tools vs daemontools jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-05-06 12:24 -0400
Re: DAEMON Tools vs daemontools John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-05-06 09:40 -0700
csiph-web