Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #669
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| Subject | Re: Selecting a hard drive |
| Date | 12 Sep 2011 00:35:24 GMT |
| Lines | 51 |
| Message-ID | <9d52ecFk8gU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <87sjo38750.fsf@engels.HistoricalMaterialism.info> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net pRm5YfkF3hVKf+KNx5D8MwHMREpvzYQi/H25to+Gf/yLjKAQDF |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:rUzl0DvZUqz7PdQcFednrdk/Q4Q= |
| User-Agent | Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.hardware:669 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:51:07 -0400, Haines Brown wrote: > My initial query seems to have disappeared, and I apologize if this is a > duplicate. > > I'm thinking of installing a second hard drive in my system for > installing linux, and I have some simple questions for choosing another > drive. I'm presently using a Seagate Barracuda SATA 3.0., 32 MB cache, > and I've been happy with it. > > I have no compelling reason to move from Seagate, but I see some > complaints about Barracuda reliability. Seagate Constellation is > apparently an upgrade, but is too new for much feedback. Is WD > considered more reliable these days than Seagate? > > The Seagate Constellation supposedly has higher data integrity, but is a > bit mysterious about just what is involved. Is there anything I have to > worry about in switching to the new Constellation regarding such > features as "PowerChoice" that might be incompatible with my existing > hardware and operating system? > > 64 MB cache is available, and it seems to have much better read/write > times, but I can't always find the data to compare. Is a move from 32 to > 64 MB an obvious step to take if affordable? > > There is also the option to move to SATA 6.0 from 3.0. My impression is > that my kernel, 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem provides a controller for SATA 6.0, > but wonder if anyone knows of problems. I assume the cable interface > remains the same. > > I imagine a slower rotation speed is good for drive life, noise, etc. as > long as the specs are otherwise the same. What are the advantages of > choosing one speed over another? > > Haines Brown I've had 3 or 4 1TB Seagates die on me, the last one was a replacement drive that Seagate sent me when I RMAed a dead drive. It lasted 4 days before it died completely, I haven't bothered to RMA it or my other bad Seagates because I've completely lost confidence in them. I've just had a Hitachi 2TB/64M cache drive die on me last week, I have several others which are still OK and I replaced the bad one with another Hitachi however I've lost confidence in them also. A have a couple of new machines with 2TB Western Digital drives, however I haven't had them long enough to say if WD drives are reliable or not. Frankly I'm not sure if anyone builds a reliable drive anymore. I backup everything critical to multiple machines both on and offsite so a drive failure never causes me any trouble, just the time to swap out and commission a new drive (I always run badblocks on a drive before I format it, a single pattern on badblocks takes about 12 hours on a 2TB drive so that's what I run. The default is four patterns but that would take two days so I don't do that).
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Selecting a hard drive Haines Brown <haines@HistoricalMaterialism.info> - 2011-09-11 10:51 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive david <none@nospam.com> - 2011-09-11 15:32 +0000
Re: Selecting a hard drive General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-12 00:35 +0000
Re: Selecting a hard drive Dirk Weber <dirk-weber@web.de> - 2011-09-13 21:40 +0200
Re: Selecting a hard drive GangGreene <GangGreene@invalid.com> - 2011-09-13 18:42 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2011-09-13 23:00 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive GangGreene <GangGreene@invalid.com> - 2011-09-14 16:20 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2011-09-15 01:11 +0000
Re: Selecting a hard drive Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2011-09-15 00:03 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive david <none@nospam.com> - 2011-09-15 10:21 +0000
Re: Selecting a hard drive Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2011-09-14 23:58 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-09-15 09:02 +0200
Re: Selecting a hard drive GangGreene <GangGreene@invalid.com> - 2011-09-15 05:24 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive Bill Marcum <bill@lat.localnet> - 2011-09-15 09:15 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive Dirk Weber <dirk-weber@web.de> - 2011-09-14 15:15 +0200
Re: Selecting a hard drive Haines Brown <haines@HistoricalMaterialism.info> - 2011-09-14 07:53 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive Dirk Weber <dirk-weber@web.de> - 2011-09-14 20:27 +0200
csiph-web