Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #667
| From | Haines Brown <haines@HistoricalMaterialism.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| Subject | Selecting a hard drive |
| Date | 2011-09-11 10:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <87sjo38750.fsf@engels.HistoricalMaterialism.info> (permalink) |
My initial query seems to have disappeared, and I apologize if this is a duplicate. I'm thinking of installing a second hard drive in my system for installing linux, and I have some simple questions for choosing another drive. I'm presently using a Seagate Barracuda SATA 3.0., 32 MB cache, and I've been happy with it. I have no compelling reason to move from Seagate, but I see some complaints about Barracuda reliability. Seagate Constellation is apparently an upgrade, but is too new for much feedback. Is WD considered more reliable these days than Seagate? The Seagate Constellation supposedly has higher data integrity, but is a bit mysterious about just what is involved. Is there anything I have to worry about in switching to the new Constellation regarding such features as "PowerChoice" that might be incompatible with my existing hardware and operating system? 64 MB cache is available, and it seems to have much better read/write times, but I can't always find the data to compare. Is a move from 32 to 64 MB an obvious step to take if affordable? There is also the option to move to SATA 6.0 from 3.0. My impression is that my kernel, 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem provides a controller for SATA 6.0, but wonder if anyone knows of problems. I assume the cable interface remains the same. I imagine a slower rotation speed is good for drive life, noise, etc. as long as the specs are otherwise the same. What are the advantages of choosing one speed over another? Haines Brown
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Selecting a hard drive Haines Brown <haines@HistoricalMaterialism.info> - 2011-09-11 10:51 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive david <none@nospam.com> - 2011-09-11 15:32 +0000
Re: Selecting a hard drive General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-12 00:35 +0000
Re: Selecting a hard drive Dirk Weber <dirk-weber@web.de> - 2011-09-13 21:40 +0200
Re: Selecting a hard drive GangGreene <GangGreene@invalid.com> - 2011-09-13 18:42 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2011-09-13 23:00 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive GangGreene <GangGreene@invalid.com> - 2011-09-14 16:20 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2011-09-15 01:11 +0000
Re: Selecting a hard drive Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2011-09-15 00:03 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive david <none@nospam.com> - 2011-09-15 10:21 +0000
Re: Selecting a hard drive Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2011-09-14 23:58 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-09-15 09:02 +0200
Re: Selecting a hard drive GangGreene <GangGreene@invalid.com> - 2011-09-15 05:24 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive Bill Marcum <bill@lat.localnet> - 2011-09-15 09:15 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive Dirk Weber <dirk-weber@web.de> - 2011-09-14 15:15 +0200
Re: Selecting a hard drive Haines Brown <haines@HistoricalMaterialism.info> - 2011-09-14 07:53 -0400
Re: Selecting a hard drive Dirk Weber <dirk-weber@web.de> - 2011-09-14 20:27 +0200
csiph-web