Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.development.apps > #436
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.development.apps |
| Subject | Re: libc versioning question |
| Date | Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:15:01 +0000 |
| Lines | 19 |
| Message-ID | <87sjhwdzi2.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> (permalink) |
| References | <jieghq$c37$1@dont-email.me> <jift39$n22$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| X-Trace | individual.net zumj6zRa2KPArDOi2iE+yQf+NeLerljSlx1fDLskdb6WmY1ek= |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:i0PU4X8WOebHhQvndja0dkLueCc= sha1:jm6UEvPGXX2MuCwkJA4GXvJhDcw= |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.development.apps:436 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> writes: > Cat22 wrote: >> I have a (precompiled) program that requires libc 2.11 but i only >> have libc 2.10. Is it practical or even possible to put the 2.11 files >> in some directory then run the program using the LD_LIBRARY_PATH >> environment variable so it would use the 2.11 versions? I dont think you >> can just upgrade libc and libstdc++ on my system without wreaking havoc >> can you? I do some C programming from time to to time, but I have not >> had to really ever consider the versions of these libs in the past so I >> just dont know what can or cant be done there. >> Thanks >> Cat22 > > Upgrading libc 2.10 to libc 2.11 (a minor version upgrade) should not cause > any issues. The problem with this is that the outcome of such an experiment isn't known until after it was conducted and it is not usually reversible.
Back to comp.os.linux.development.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
libc versioning question Cat22 <cat22@invalid.org> - 2012-02-26 15:51 -0800
Re: libc versioning question Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2012-02-27 12:31 +0000
Re: libc versioning question Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-02-27 16:15 +0000
Re: libc versioning question Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2012-02-27 17:23 +0000
Re: libc versioning question Cat22 <cat22@invalid.org> - 2012-02-28 00:49 -0800
Re: libc versioning question Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2012-02-28 09:24 +0000
Re: libc versioning question Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-02-28 14:47 +0000
Re: libc versioning question John Reiser <jreiserfl@comcast.net> - 2012-02-28 08:06 -0800
csiph-web