Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.development.apps > #441

Re: libc versioning question

Date 2012-02-28 08:06 -0800
From John Reiser <jreiserfl@comcast.net>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject Re: libc versioning question
References <jieghq$c37$1@dont-email.me>
Message-ID <76CdnYaNf6vHZtHSRVn_vwA@giganews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


>   I have a (precompiled) program that requires libc 2.11
> but i only have libc 2.10. Is it practical or even possible
> to put the 2.11 files in some directory then run the program
> using the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable so it would use
> the 2.11 versions?

Yes.  See  http://bitwagon.com/rtldi/rtldi.html .
For a one-time test you can run
  /path/to/new/ld-linux.so.2  --library-path  /path/to/new:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH  /path/of/execve/my_app  args...
with /path/to/new containing as much of the new glibc as you wish to test.

-- 

Back to comp.os.linux.development.apps | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

libc versioning question Cat22 <cat22@invalid.org> - 2012-02-26 15:51 -0800
  Re: libc versioning question Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2012-02-27 12:31 +0000
    Re: libc versioning question Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-02-27 16:15 +0000
      Re: libc versioning question Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2012-02-27 17:23 +0000
        Re: libc versioning question Cat22 <cat22@invalid.org> - 2012-02-28 00:49 -0800
        Re: libc versioning question Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2012-02-28 09:24 +0000
        Re: libc versioning question Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-02-28 14:47 +0000
  Re: libc versioning question John Reiser <jreiserfl@comcast.net> - 2012-02-28 08:06 -0800

csiph-web