Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.development.apps > #441
| Date | 2012-02-28 08:06 -0800 |
|---|---|
| From | John Reiser <jreiserfl@comcast.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.development.apps |
| Subject | Re: libc versioning question |
| References | <jieghq$c37$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <76CdnYaNf6vHZtHSRVn_vwA@giganews.com> (permalink) |
> I have a (precompiled) program that requires libc 2.11 > but i only have libc 2.10. Is it practical or even possible > to put the 2.11 files in some directory then run the program > using the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable so it would use > the 2.11 versions? Yes. See http://bitwagon.com/rtldi/rtldi.html . For a one-time test you can run /path/to/new/ld-linux.so.2 --library-path /path/to/new:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH /path/of/execve/my_app args... with /path/to/new containing as much of the new glibc as you wish to test. --
Back to comp.os.linux.development.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
libc versioning question Cat22 <cat22@invalid.org> - 2012-02-26 15:51 -0800
Re: libc versioning question Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2012-02-27 12:31 +0000
Re: libc versioning question Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-02-27 16:15 +0000
Re: libc versioning question Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2012-02-27 17:23 +0000
Re: libc versioning question Cat22 <cat22@invalid.org> - 2012-02-28 00:49 -0800
Re: libc versioning question Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2012-02-28 09:24 +0000
Re: libc versioning question Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-02-28 14:47 +0000
Re: libc versioning question John Reiser <jreiserfl@comcast.net> - 2012-02-28 08:06 -0800
csiph-web