Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #18067 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-04-24 05:30 -0500 |
| Last post | 2011-04-28 10:50 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 236 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> - 2011-04-24 05:30 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 13:29 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 21:50 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 18:14 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:49 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:01 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 08:35 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-25 06:13 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:58 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:43 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 17:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 11:16 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 23:17 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:31 -0400
What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 03:23 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:21 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:24 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:38 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 22:25 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 18:46 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 22:14 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 05:49 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:44 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 21:42 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:09 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:18 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:44 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:51 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:16 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 22:21 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 17:36 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:36 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:39 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 07:37 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:04 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:36 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 11:37 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:43 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:44 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 09:26 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 18:59 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:01 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:37 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:42 +0200
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:22 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 16:03 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 15:37 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 20:33 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 17:15 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:46 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 18:59 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:10 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:29 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:05 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 11:17 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Rob <me@privacy.net> - 2011-04-24 10:33 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 13:53 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-24 18:57 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 11:32 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 20:19 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:06 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 14:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-24 21:27 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 16:33 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:02 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 21:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-24 20:52 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 22:05 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 05:32 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 01:38 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:00 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:33 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:45 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:31 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 20:52 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 19:33 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 17:50 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 13:00 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:41 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 09:18 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 16:09 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:14 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 16:23 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-04-25 16:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:25 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:13 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 05:57 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 17:30 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:34 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 23:03 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 05:35 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 09:41 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 10:46 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:13 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 11:19 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:43 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 10:26 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:44 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 16:57 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:34 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 01:45 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:31 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:09 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 04:35 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:35 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 14:42 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:13 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 02:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 09:26 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:11 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 16:41 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-28 13:00 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-28 19:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 06:20 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-29 06:30 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 07:16 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 08:23 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 09:49 -0400
Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:24 -0500
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:38 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:46 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:54 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:28 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:36 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:05 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:07 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:20 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:34 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:33 +0100
"Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:14 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:24 +0100
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:45 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:27 -0400
Re: (buh-bye turd) I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:31 -0400
The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:26 -0500
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:42 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 15:34 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0500
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:14 -0500
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 09:00 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 10:02 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0400
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:20 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-28 16:25 +0100
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:21 -0400
Re: "chrisv" - a WORLD CLASS IDIOT. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:43 -0400
"Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:19 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:22 -0400
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:13 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 16:19 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 16:32 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:06 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:12 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:39 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:42 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:44 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:48 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:52 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:56 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 19:42 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 19:43 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:10 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:26 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:25 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 05:16 +0000
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 17:46 +0200
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:57 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:09 -0500
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:12 +0200
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:14 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:23 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 11:03 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:16 -0500
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:25 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:37 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:57 -0500
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:07 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
"Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:22 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:46 -0400
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:21 +0100
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals stukie <stukieh@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 23:41 +0000
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:44 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 16:28 +0200
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:22 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:47 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:28 -0400
[Troll] Laying down with pigs... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 16:21 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 10:28 -0500
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-27 16:30 +0100
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 23:11 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 09:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs (chrisv's wife)... "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:36 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:39 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:48 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:01 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:32 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:20 -0500
[Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:20 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 11:54 +0100
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 08:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:11 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:53 +0200
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:12 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 08:12 -0500
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 09:34 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:20 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-27 20:43 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 20:48 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 21:23 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 07:35 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 10:50 -0400
Page 10 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 Next page →
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 11:57 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented |
| Message-ID | <ipc2pr$r2a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #19548 |
"Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3dtydiv0ov.fsf@news.eternal-september.org...
> "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> writes:
>
>> "flatfish+++" <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote in message
>> news:huk16cb7spbq.1k0nmyvs9e08j$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:00:25 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I'm done with this. Wasting my time arguing with that moron would
>>>>>almost
>>>>>make me as stupid as he is. How can you possible have a rational
>>>>>argument
>>>>>with someone who makes a claim ("evidence has already been presented")
>>>>>and
>>>>>then when you ask to see this evidence they reply - "Prove that
>>>>>evidence
>>>>>has
>>>>>not been presented - ever."
>>>>
>>>> A much better question is "How can you possibly have a rational
>>>> argument with someone who calls you a 'proven liar' over something
>>>> that he cannot *possibly* know, much less prove?"
>>
>>>> In this case, there is *no possible way* for the trolling
>>>> fsckwit to know that I did not do as I had claimed. There
>>>> is *no possible way* for him to prove that I did not do
>>>> as I had claimed.
>>
>>> Why do you lie so much chrisv?
>>>
>>
>> The turd really is dumber than shit and proves it here again. Look at all
>> the double-negatives in *his* last paragraph:
>>
>> - "there is *no possible way* ... to know that I did not do as I had
>> claimed... *no possible way* for him to prove that I did not do as I had
>> claimed."
>>
>> 'No way to not know what not possibly he did not do.' - What the FSCK
>> does
>> this even mean?
>>
>> If the only way turd can attempt to salvage his LIES is with this
>> ridiculous
>> nonsense then it shows what a shameless LIAR he is.
>>
>> (chrisv turd) - "Evidence has been presented." (that HQ = LQ)
>> (Zeke) - Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented?
>>
>> That's ALL there is to it. Not a bunch of twisted bullshit about 'No way
>> to
>> not know what not possibly did not do.'
>>
>> It is VERY SIMPLE - turd made a claim. Now backup the claim without doing
>> a
>> word-jumble.
>>
>> --- "Prove that evidence has not been presented - ever."
>>
>> This is the beginning of the word twisting in order to sleaze out of his
>> lies. It's the same "you can't prove something never happened" logic as:
>>
>> Hey chrisv turd - You once posted that you like to suck horse dick. Now
>> Prove that you never posted this - ever.
>>
>>> You have proven nothing other than the fact you are an idiot.
>>>
>>
>> He really is the dumbest of the dumb. Notice how other advocates have
>> enough
>> brains and common sense to avoid him in this thread.
>>
>>>
>>> The more you squawk and start new threads attacking Zeke, the more
>>> ignorant you look.
>>> If that's even possible.
>>>
>>
>> He's like a helpless little 3-lb pocket dog that does nothing but yelp
>> and
>> screech. He thinks he's hot shit but the rest of the world see's him as
>> the
>> pathetic little joke he is.
>
> And the bottom line (steady on there sMarti) is that
> I am hot and never have been "Larry".
>
It doesn't matter. Turd has "evidence" that you are Larry except that nobody
can not prove that he didn't not post this - ever. So therefore you're
lying and he's telling the truth because of the lack of proof that he didn't
not ever post something.
Yes... turd really is this stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 11:09 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented |
| Message-ID | <em3jr6djo4gsk8trtv7kofiqsn2jh7qu5j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #19550 |
Ezekiel wrote: >Turd has "evidence" that you are Larry Yep. >except that nobody can not prove that he didn't not post this - ever. Yep. No one could even possibly know that I didn't present evidence, much less prove it. >So therefore you're lying and he's telling the truth because of the lack of proof that he didn't >not ever post something. Nope. You are lying again, "Ezekiel". The above "therefore you're lying" is incorrect. That is not the logic of what I've written at all. I'm saying that you're a stupid POS who placed himself in an indefensible position by calling me a "liar" when you had *no possible way* to know that I had lied. Indeed, no real reason to even *suspect* that I had lied! I know that you do not read and remember all of my posts! Is it really so hard to believe that we had not presented and discussed some evidence regarding the Larry?"Hadron" issue? Sheesh! Besides the above, I will say that I personally know that you are lying when you claim that I lied about presenting evidence. This is simply my personal knowledge of fact. You are a *fscking* liar, "Ezekiel". I *know* this to be *fact*. At least "Hadron" likes you. >Yes... turd really is this stupid. So you keep telling us, as I routinely hand you your ass.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 18:12 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented |
| Message-ID | <evd3k6uzhi.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #19554 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> writes: > Ezekiel wrote: > >>Turd has "evidence" that you are Larry > > Yep. > >>except that nobody can not prove that he didn't not post this - ever. > > Yep. No one could even possibly know that I didn't present evidence, > much less prove it. > >>So therefore you're lying and he's telling the truth because of the lack of proof that he didn't >>not ever post something. > > Nope. You are lying again, "Ezekiel". > > The above "therefore you're lying" is incorrect. That is not the > logic of what I've written at all. > > I'm saying that you're a stupid POS who placed himself in an > indefensible position by calling me a "liar" when you had *no possible > way* to know that I had lied. You did lie. 100%.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 12:14 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented |
| Message-ID | <1530msa0kvqwf.9nl29jtyng6x.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #19554 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:09:38 -0500, chrisv wrote: > You are a *fscking* liar, "Ezekiel". I *know* this to be *fact*. I "know" the Easter Bunny left me some candy last week. I can't *prove* it was him, but I *know* it must have because it was Easter and we all know the Easter Bunny leaves candy on Easter. Point is chrisv, you have zero proof. You have offered zero proof. So why not either put up or shut up and move on? You just look even more the fool the more you post. -- flatfish+++ Please visit our hall of Linux idiots. http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/ Watching Linux Fail: http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/ Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead "By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory." http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 12:23 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented |
| Message-ID | <ipc4c1$3je$4@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #19554 |
whining piece of shit "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:em3jr6djo4gsk8trtv7kofiqsn2jh7qu5j@4ax.com... > Ezekiel wrote: > >>Turd has "evidence" that you are Larry > > Yep. > >>except that nobody can not prove that he didn't not post this - ever. > > Yep. No one could even possibly know that I didn't present evidence, > much less prove it. > >>So therefore you're lying and he's telling the truth because of the lack >>of proof that he didn't >>not ever post something. > > Nope. You are lying again, "Ezekiel". > > The above "therefore you're lying" is incorrect. That is not the > logic of what I've written at all. > > I'm saying that you're a stupid POS who placed himself in an > indefensible position by calling me a "liar" when you had *no possible > way* to know that I had lied. > > Indeed, no real reason to even *suspect* that I had lied! I know that > you do not read and remember all of my posts! Is it really so hard to > believe that we had not presented and discussed some evidence > regarding the Larry?"Hadron" issue? > > Sheesh! > > Besides the above, I will say that I personally know that you are > lying when you claim that I lied about presenting evidence. This is > simply my personal knowledge of fact. > > You are a *fscking* liar, "Ezekiel". I *know* this to be *fact*. > > At least "Hadron" likes you. > >>Yes... turd really is this stupid. > > So you keep telling us, as I routinely hand you your ass. > BAWAWWWAWAWAAAAAA!!!!! go cry to mommy your stupid fscking turd. nobody gives a shit what a documented liar like you has to say. BAWAWWAWWAAAAAAA!!!! poor wittle babby. "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a whining piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 11:03 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented |
| Message-ID | <ipbvkv$9rs$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #19496 |
On 4/28/2011 10:00 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Ezekiel wrote:
>
>> I'm done with this. Wasting my time arguing with that moron would almost
>> make me as stupid as he is. How can you possible have a rational argument
>> with someone who makes a claim ("evidence has already been presented") and
>> then when you ask to see this evidence they reply - "Prove that evidence has
>> not been presented - ever."
>
> A much better question is "How can you possibly have a rational
> argument with someone who calls you a 'proven liar' over something
> that he cannot *possibly* know, much less prove?"
>
> See, if *someone else* claims that you did something, and you know
> it's not true, it is *right* to call them a liar and demand proof of
> their claim. You *know* that they lied, and that's all you need to
> rightfully call them a liar.
>
> On the other hand, if you claim that *you yourself* did something, it
> is *not* right for someone else to call you a liar, unless they are
> absolutely *certain* that you have not done what you have claimed.
>
> In this case, there is *no possible way* for the trolling fsckwit to
> know that I did not do as I had claimed. There is *no possible way*
> for him to prove that I did not do as I had claimed.
>
> You see, "Ezekiel", I *knew* the impossibility of what I asked you do.
> I *knew* that you, through your idiocy and your lies, had put yourself
> into an indefensible position. *That was my point*
>
> You have been *spanked*, "Ezekiel". You have been *slam-dunked*. Get
> it?
>
> Of course, you were too fscking *stupid* to understand any of this.
> So, what did you do? You lashed-out, claiming that I am a "moron"
> with whom it is not possible to have a rational argument. Oh, the
> irony.
>
> You see, "Ezekiel", when I claim that I've handed you your ass, it's
> no idle boast. It's the truth.
You're all twisted up inside, turd.
Slit your wrists lengthwise and end the pain. Do it now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 13:16 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... |
| Message-ID | <6c2er652nrh2j9cmagh4klls34uc8em5kn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18725 |
Ezekiel wrote:
>
>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
>news:0vtdr6hso8jjgbj18d1eie25ljm3m4afgg@4ax.com...
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig.
>>>>>
>>>>>Evidence has been presented.
>>> Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented?
>
>>
>> Prove that evidence has not been presented. Ever.
>>
>> You fscking *hypocrite*.
>
>Here's how things work retard - you made a claim ("Evidence has been
>presented").
>
>It's not my job to prove that "evidence has not been presented." The person
>who made the claim (that's you turd) is the one who needs to prove his or
>her claim.
Err, no, I really do not "need" to do anything, you stupid POS. I
know that we have discussed our evidence in the past.
It's the truth. It's a fact. The rantings of the piece of shit liar
"Ezekie" cannot change the facts.
Just to "make you happy", I redundantly mentioned some reasons today.
The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" cannot beat me with his lies.
>Even a completely clueless piece of shit liar like you might have the
>required dozen or so braincells to figure this out.
Yet more "Ezekiel" lies. "Ezekiel" is a piece of shit liar, which I
have *again* documented in this thread. "Ezekiel" lies without shame!
OTOH, I have been *completely* honest. I've not said one thing that I
do not believe to be true. *Period*
Poor "Ezekiel" - that piece of shit liar got his ass handed to him
again!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 14:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... |
| Message-ID | <ip72nd$dr6$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #18749 |
documented piece of shit "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:6c2er652nrh2j9cmagh4klls34uc8em5kn@4ax.com...
> Ezekiel wrote:
>
>>
>>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:0vtdr6hso8jjgbj18d1eie25ljm3m4afgg@4ax.com...
>>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Evidence has been presented.
>>>> Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented?
>>
>>>
>>> Prove that evidence has not been presented. Ever.
>>>
>>> You fscking *hypocrite*.
>>
>>Here's how things work retard - you made a claim ("Evidence has been
>>presented").
>>
>>It's not my job to prove that "evidence has not been presented." The
>>person
>>who made the claim (that's you turd) is the one who needs to prove his or
>>her claim.
>
> Err, no, I really do not "need" to do anything, you stupid POS. I
> know that we have discussed our evidence in the past.
>
> It's the truth. It's a fact. The rantings of the piece of shit liar
> "Ezekie" cannot change the facts.
>
> Just to "make you happy", I redundantly mentioned some reasons today.
>
> The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" cannot beat me with his lies.
>
>>Even a completely clueless piece of shit liar like you might have the
>>required dozen or so braincells to figure this out.
>
> Yet more "Ezekiel" lies. "Ezekiel" is a piece of shit liar, which I
> have *again* documented in this thread. "Ezekiel" lies without shame!
>
> OTOH, I have been *completely* honest. I've not said one thing that I
> do not believe to be true. *Period*
>
> Poor "Ezekiel" - that piece of shit liar got his ass handed to him
> again!
>
more DOCUMENTED lies from the stupid piece of shit.
"chrisv" is a documented liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 14:37 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... |
| Message-ID | <ip73cu$ivk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18752 |
"robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> wrote in message
news:ip72nd$dr6$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>
> documented piece of shit "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:6c2er652nrh2j9cmagh4klls34uc8em5kn@4ax.com...
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
>>>news:0vtdr6hso8jjgbj18d1eie25ljm3m4afgg@4ax.com...
>>>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Evidence has been presented.
>>>>> Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Prove that evidence has not been presented. Ever.
>>>>
>>>> You fscking *hypocrite*.
>>>
>>>Here's how things work retard - you made a claim ("Evidence has been
>>>presented").
>>>
>>>It's not my job to prove that "evidence has not been presented." The
>>>person
>>>who made the claim (that's you turd) is the one who needs to prove his or
>>>her claim.
>>
>> Err, no, I really do not "need" to do anything, you stupid POS. I
>> know that we have discussed our evidence in the past.
>>
>> It's the truth. It's a fact. The rantings of the piece of shit liar
>> "Ezekie" cannot change the facts.
>>
>> Just to "make you happy", I redundantly mentioned some reasons today.
>>
>> The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" cannot beat me with his lies.
>>
>>>Even a completely clueless piece of shit liar like you might have the
>>>required dozen or so braincells to figure this out.
>>
>> Yet more "Ezekiel" lies. "Ezekiel" is a piece of shit liar, which I
>> have *again* documented in this thread. "Ezekiel" lies without shame!
>>
>> OTOH, I have been *completely* honest. I've not said one thing that I
>> do not believe to be true. *Period*
>>
>> Poor "Ezekiel" - that piece of shit liar got his ass handed to him
>> again!
>>
>
> more DOCUMENTED lies from the stupid piece of shit.
>
> "chrisv" is a documented liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
>
Translation - If there was *any* evidence posted here that Hadron is LQ then
the stupid turd would have posted it by now. I'm sure the turd searched and
searched trying to find this evidence and came up empty handed. Since there
is no evidence to post and the lying turd knows it so he's trying to save
face with other fellow retards and saying - "you prove the evidence was
never posted."
And look at that idiot's last sentence - only a complete moron (like turd)
would not only be humiliated by the beat-down, but would be stupid enough to
think he's actually debated well.
<quote>
>>Evidence has been presented.
> Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented?
Prove that evidence has not been presented. Ever.
</quote>
It's a fact that the "chrisv" turd is a lying shit-stain. He's lying when he
claims "evidence has been presented" because even the dumbest idiot in the
world would quit taking an ass-whooping and try and defend himself. The fact
that turd can't defend himself at all by producing this "evidence" he claims
has been presented shows exactly what sort of lying piece of shit he really
is.
After posting earlier to that disgusting piece of shit "chrisv" - I feel the
need to bathe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 13:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... |
| Message-ID | <vr4er6h86550qp7kbm3binic6hsn5oajt1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18759 |
Ezekiel wrote: >Translation - If there was *any* evidence posted here that Hadron is LQ then >the stupid turd would have posted it by now. I see the piece of shit liar is *ignoring* the reasons that I posted *just today*. >I'm sure the turd searched and >searched trying to find this evidence and came up empty handed. Nope. I know it would be too hard to [ull the discussion out of the Google haystack. >Since there >is no evidence to post and the lying turd knows it so he's trying to save >face with other fellow retards and saying - "you prove the evidence was >never posted." It doesn't matter in the end. I told the truth, and there's zero reason for anyone to thing otherwise. There is only the screamings of the known piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" foaming that I can't prove it. >And look at that idiot's last sentence - only a complete moron (like turd) >would not only be humiliated by the beat-down, but would be stupid enough to >think he's actually debated well. LOL I've debated a hell of of lot better than you, fsckwit. You see, I'm honest and correct. You are a liar. You *cannot beat me*. >It's a fact that the "chrisv" turd is a lying shit-stain. Another bald-faced "Ezekiel" lie. Documented. I'm note like you, "Ezekiel". I don't lie. >He's lying when he claims "evidence has been presented" Yet *another* bald-faced "Ezekiel" lie. Documented. *FACT* Evidence has been presented. Can I make it any more clear? > because even the dumbest idiot in the >world would quit taking an ass-whooping and try and defend himself. *Guffaw* Your lies do not constitute an "ass-whooping", Ezekiel. >The fact that turd can't defend himself at all by producing this "evidence" >he claims has been presented shows exactly what sort of lying piece of shit he really is. Nope. Just more *shameless* lying from the piece of shit liar "Ezekiel". Fact: I've been *completely* honest, in here. *Period* "Ezekiel" is a liar. "Ezekiel" is a POS. >After posting earlier to that disgusting piece of shit "chrisv" - I feel the >need to bathe. LOL Poor "Ezekiel". At least you have "OSOK" on your side. *Guffaw*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 16:07 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... |
| Message-ID | <ip78m2$grj$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18789 |
On 4/26/2011 2:57 PM, chrisv wrote: > Nope. I know it would be too hard to [ull the discussion out of the > Google haystack. So you're a liar who runs from his lies by claiming he's too lazy to find the proof of his lies. Gotcha, turd. > You see, I'm honest and correct. > > I'm note like you, "Ezekiel". I don't lie. > > Fact: I've been *completely* honest, in here. *Period* heh! You're a piece of crap, chrisv. *Period* > Poor "Ezekiel". At least you have "OSOK" on your side. Who at least has the potential to be a better poster than you. > *Guffaw* Slit 'em lengthwise, shithead. And post a video for our enjoyment.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. |
| Message-ID | <ip79cd$q61$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18713 |
On 4/26/2011 1:14 PM, chrisv wrote: > I honestly believe Quack is Larry. Lying piece of trash.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 12:22 -0500 |
| Subject | "Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy |
| Message-ID | <jcvdr6l8h99lvn1ep4ls879aehek2sbopo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18702 |
Ezekiel wrote: >You claimed Hadron is Larry - prove it liar. Can anyone believe that *this* is an issue where "Ezekiel" feels that he's got a strong-enough case to go an a big offensive to demonstrate that I "lied". My inability to "prove" that "Hadron" is Larry makes me a "liar" for saying that I think he is? I mean, WTF? *This* is what he bases his hopes and dreams of finally catching me in a "lie"? Is this guy the biggest idiot on USENET, or just unbelievably desperate for "victory" after getting his ass kicked all the time? One side of the fsckwit's mouth: I can call you guys "hypocrites" *constantly* for made-up non-reasons that I call "opinions". Other side of the fsckwit's mouth: You called him "Larry". You are a "piece of shit liar" unless you can "prove it".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy |
| Message-ID | <ip6vmj$5bs$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #18720 |
useless piece of shhit "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:jcvdr6l8h99lvn1ep4ls879aehek2sbopo@4ax.com... more documented lies from the stupid piece of shit. "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a worthless piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 14:46 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <ip73ul$jkm$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18702 |
On 4/26/2011 12:46 PM, Ezekiel wrote: > The "prove it" is rhetorical. I don't demand or expect any proof because I > know that a piece of shit liar like you can not and will not provide > anything to backup you lies. While the loser is at it, get him to support some other lies he made: "Vista needs 4G and 2 fast CPU's to run acceptably well." "Windows fits only one situation: a single-user desktop PC" "DFS is a liar" "Microsoft imposes the Windows tax upon even the poorest of third-world countries"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 13:22 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals |
| Message-ID | <ip6v14$3kd$5@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #18700 |
fscking asshole "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:m2tdr61lsv8a1isag0m7in1ul3b7fmoc1f@4ax.com... poor chrisv turd - s/h/it tries to hard to pretend he has a brain. "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a stupid piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 18:21 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals |
| Message-ID | <jhbj88-brm.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #18700 |
chrisv wrote: > chrisv wrote: > >>Ezekiel wrote: >> >>>chrisv is constantly saying how the trolls are attacking the decent and >>>honest advocates. >> >>Yep. >> >>>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig. >> >>Evidence has been presented. >> >>>If you can't then you >>>are a lying piece of shit just like people say you are. >> >>Another bald-face "Ezekiel" lie. Documented. >> >>Poor "Ezekiel", your hypocrisy knows no bounds, does it? >> >>You, who spew all sorts of filthy, dishonest attacks and then defend >>them as "opinions", now demands "proof" of mine. >> >>And why not use the proper term, which would be "evidence", you >>*stupid* POS? >> >>Is it because you're a patently dishonest POS, or because you're a >>fscking idiot who doesn't understand the difference? >> >>>I'm sure he'll be providing proof for his claim real soon. >> >>Evidence has been presented, and I honestly believe that he is Larry >>Qualig. >> >>That's no lie, and anyone who claims that that it is is a liar. >> >>OTOH... >> >>"Ezekiel" *cannot* honestly believe things like "each and every >>advocate happens to support the one and only party-line that >>Schestowitz defined for them." >> >>"Ezekiel" *cannot* honestly believe that we are "hypocrites" because >>we think that certain things that are A-OK when done in a normal, >>competitive situation, but objectional when done by a company that >>already has extraordinary power in the market. > > Why has "Ezekiel" not responded to any of the above? > > It appears that "Ezekiel" has me filtered, and therefore can safely > ignore anything that I write but has not been quoted by someone else. > > Makes it a bit difficult to have a "fair" argument, I would say! Fair argument with that wintroll? Surely you jest! "Never argue with idiots. First they drag you down to their level, then they beat you with their experience." -- Dilbert -- -- Earth is 98% full...please delete anyone you can. "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | stukie <stukieh@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 23:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals |
| Message-ID | <ip7l7e$554$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #18700 |
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:38:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: > > It appears that "Ezekiel" has me filtered, and therefore can safely > ignore anything that I write but has not been quoted by someone else. > > Makes it a bit difficult to have a "fair" argument, I would say! > don't like the taste of your own soup? wonder why... ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 14:44 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again |
| Message-ID | <1dzvvs5af4d1g.4y0dapmy4kwt$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #18648 |
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:24:24 -0500, chrisv wrote: > Evidence has been presented. Why are you LIEing for LIEnux? No evidence has been presented. Zeke and DFS tossed Willy Poaster to the curb with facts. They buried him in fact and you don't like it but that doesn't make it any less true. -- flatfish+++ Please visit our hall of Linux idiots. http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/ Watching Linux Fail: http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/ Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead "By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory." http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 16:28 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <v08vuxhytj.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #18647 |
"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> writes: > "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> wrote in message > news:ip6dg5$j9o$1@speranza.aioe.org... >> >> "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:cpddr6d85s33djcsi9n87pt7l8gi5685al@4ax.com... >>> TomB wrote: >>> >> >>> It's Larry Qualig's upside-down world, where the clueless liars like >>> him are the ones with all the credibility. >>> >> >> and I am sure that a lieing piece of shit like you has proof that he is >> Larry Qualig. >> > > chrisv is constantly saying how the trolls are attacking the decent and > honest advocates. So I'll make this real simple for you: > > "... Larry Qualig's upside-down world, ... clueless liars like him... " > > Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig. If you can't then you > are a lying piece of shit just like people say you are. > >> "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a stupid piece of shit. >> >> > > I'm sure he'll be providing proof for his claim real soon. chrisv is simply a useless turd. I am not and never have been Larry anything. He knows it, his new lickspittle Ahlstrom knows it but they think if they repeat it often enough it will become the truth. Only William Poaster is more useless than the chrisv turd. He needs flushing away.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web