Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #19550
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented |
| Date | 2011-04-28 11:57 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ipc2pr$r2a$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <cpddr6d85s33djcsi9n87pt7l8gi5685al@4ax.com><ip6dg5$j9o$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ip6igm$601$1@dont-email.me><88kdr6httcvip9hftq7vctsllbisjn67cv@4ax.com><m2tdr61lsv8a1isag0m7in1ul3b7fmoc1f@4ax.com><ip6stq$388$1@dont-email.me><0vtdr6hso8jjgbj18d1eie25ljm3m4afgg@4ax.com><ip6vau$eg$1@dont-email.me> <ip6vhj$3o2$1@dont-email.me><e03er6d1g083015m6tbe5i7m2pst68nb8t@4ax.com><1lonyv0wwjtbq$.1jx84cy1mi32b.dlg@40tude.net><ip757d$958$1@dont-email.me><39rir69r7g72mj3g99u1hhs4l1m57jvtq7@4ax.com><huk16cb7spbq.1k0nmyvs9e08j$.dlg@40tude.net><ipbtob$8l2$1@dont-email.me> <3dtydiv0ov.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
"Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3dtydiv0ov.fsf@news.eternal-september.org...
> "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> writes:
>
>> "flatfish+++" <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote in message
>> news:huk16cb7spbq.1k0nmyvs9e08j$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:00:25 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I'm done with this. Wasting my time arguing with that moron would
>>>>>almost
>>>>>make me as stupid as he is. How can you possible have a rational
>>>>>argument
>>>>>with someone who makes a claim ("evidence has already been presented")
>>>>>and
>>>>>then when you ask to see this evidence they reply - "Prove that
>>>>>evidence
>>>>>has
>>>>>not been presented - ever."
>>>>
>>>> A much better question is "How can you possibly have a rational
>>>> argument with someone who calls you a 'proven liar' over something
>>>> that he cannot *possibly* know, much less prove?"
>>
>>>> In this case, there is *no possible way* for the trolling
>>>> fsckwit to know that I did not do as I had claimed. There
>>>> is *no possible way* for him to prove that I did not do
>>>> as I had claimed.
>>
>>> Why do you lie so much chrisv?
>>>
>>
>> The turd really is dumber than shit and proves it here again. Look at all
>> the double-negatives in *his* last paragraph:
>>
>> - "there is *no possible way* ... to know that I did not do as I had
>> claimed... *no possible way* for him to prove that I did not do as I had
>> claimed."
>>
>> 'No way to not know what not possibly he did not do.' - What the FSCK
>> does
>> this even mean?
>>
>> If the only way turd can attempt to salvage his LIES is with this
>> ridiculous
>> nonsense then it shows what a shameless LIAR he is.
>>
>> (chrisv turd) - "Evidence has been presented." (that HQ = LQ)
>> (Zeke) - Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented?
>>
>> That's ALL there is to it. Not a bunch of twisted bullshit about 'No way
>> to
>> not know what not possibly did not do.'
>>
>> It is VERY SIMPLE - turd made a claim. Now backup the claim without doing
>> a
>> word-jumble.
>>
>> --- "Prove that evidence has not been presented - ever."
>>
>> This is the beginning of the word twisting in order to sleaze out of his
>> lies. It's the same "you can't prove something never happened" logic as:
>>
>> Hey chrisv turd - You once posted that you like to suck horse dick. Now
>> Prove that you never posted this - ever.
>>
>>> You have proven nothing other than the fact you are an idiot.
>>>
>>
>> He really is the dumbest of the dumb. Notice how other advocates have
>> enough
>> brains and common sense to avoid him in this thread.
>>
>>>
>>> The more you squawk and start new threads attacking Zeke, the more
>>> ignorant you look.
>>> If that's even possible.
>>>
>>
>> He's like a helpless little 3-lb pocket dog that does nothing but yelp
>> and
>> screech. He thinks he's hot shit but the rest of the world see's him as
>> the
>> pathetic little joke he is.
>
> And the bottom line (steady on there sMarti) is that
> I am hot and never have been "Larry".
>
It doesn't matter. Turd has "evidence" that you are Larry except that nobody
can not prove that he didn't not post this - ever. So therefore you're
lying and he's telling the truth because of the lack of proof that he didn't
not ever post something.
Yes... turd really is this stupid.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> - 2011-04-24 05:30 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 13:29 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 21:50 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 18:14 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:49 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:01 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 08:35 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-25 06:13 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:58 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:43 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 17:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 11:16 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 23:17 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:31 -0400
What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 03:23 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:21 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:24 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:38 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 22:25 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 18:46 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 22:14 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 05:49 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:44 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 21:42 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:09 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:18 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:44 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:51 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:16 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 22:21 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 17:36 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:36 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:39 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 07:37 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:04 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:36 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 11:37 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:43 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:44 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 09:26 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 18:59 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:01 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:37 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:42 +0200
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:22 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 16:03 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 15:37 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 20:33 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 17:15 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:46 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 18:59 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:10 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:29 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:05 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 11:17 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Rob <me@privacy.net> - 2011-04-24 10:33 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 13:53 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-24 18:57 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 11:32 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 20:19 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:06 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 14:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-24 21:27 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 16:33 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:02 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 21:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-24 20:52 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 22:05 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 05:32 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 01:38 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:00 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:33 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:45 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:31 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 20:52 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 19:33 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 17:50 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 13:00 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:41 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 09:18 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 16:09 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:14 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 16:23 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-04-25 16:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:25 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:13 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 05:57 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 17:30 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:34 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 23:03 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 05:35 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 09:41 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 10:46 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:13 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 11:19 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:43 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 10:26 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:44 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 16:57 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:34 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 01:45 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:31 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:09 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 04:35 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:35 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 14:42 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:13 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 02:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 09:26 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:11 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 16:41 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-28 13:00 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-28 19:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 06:20 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-29 06:30 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 07:16 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 08:23 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 09:49 -0400
Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:24 -0500
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:38 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:46 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:54 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:28 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:36 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:05 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:07 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:20 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:34 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:33 +0100
"Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:14 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:24 +0100
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:45 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:27 -0400
Re: (buh-bye turd) I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:31 -0400
The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:26 -0500
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:42 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 15:34 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0500
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:14 -0500
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 09:00 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 10:02 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0400
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:20 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-28 16:25 +0100
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:21 -0400
Re: "chrisv" - a WORLD CLASS IDIOT. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:43 -0400
"Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:19 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:22 -0400
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:13 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 16:19 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 16:32 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:06 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:12 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:39 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:42 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:44 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:48 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:52 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:56 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 19:42 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 19:43 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:10 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:26 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:25 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 05:16 +0000
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 17:46 +0200
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:57 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:09 -0500
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:12 +0200
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:14 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:23 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 11:03 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:16 -0500
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:25 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:37 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:57 -0500
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:07 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
"Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:22 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:46 -0400
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:21 +0100
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals stukie <stukieh@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 23:41 +0000
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:44 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 16:28 +0200
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:22 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:47 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:28 -0400
[Troll] Laying down with pigs... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 16:21 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 10:28 -0500
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-27 16:30 +0100
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 23:11 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 09:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs (chrisv's wife)... "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:36 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:39 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:48 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:01 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:32 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:20 -0500
[Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:20 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 11:54 +0100
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 08:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:11 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:53 +0200
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:12 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 08:12 -0500
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 09:34 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:20 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-27 20:43 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 20:48 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 21:23 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 07:35 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 10:50 -0400
csiph-web