Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268383 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-11-21 16:05 -0800 |
| Last post | 2014-11-24 11:03 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 121 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-21 16:05 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:22 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:30 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:39 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:47 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 05:04 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 22:51 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 06:20 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 09:36 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 17:27 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 10:54 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-23 14:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-11-23 13:27 -0600
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:01 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:00 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science "alt.support.heartburn" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-11-23 19:21 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:48 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-23 14:14 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 20:32 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 18:21 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 16:27 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:08 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:52 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:17 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 01:16 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 22:18 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 03:55 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:18 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:30 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:38 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-26 07:50 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:13 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:23 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:56 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:27 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 12:56 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 13:02 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-26 21:59 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 14:35 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-27 06:35 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 08:58 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-11-27 14:11 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-27 15:26 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 09:28 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-27 10:02 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:17 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-27 17:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 14:24 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:14 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:39 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 12:08 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 11:15 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 17:50 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 19:11 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:29 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:19 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:51 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 12:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 11:10 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 14:11 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-11-27 22:41 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-27 23:56 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 16:49 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 16:57 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:24 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 19:11 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 20:38 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:52 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 20:01 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 21:06 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-28 09:56 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 09:34 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-28 17:40 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 09:48 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 09:35 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-28 11:12 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 12:25 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 14:30 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-28 20:44 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 19:07 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 07:52 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-28 11:31 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-29 13:50 -0600
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-29 12:55 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-29 12:56 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 12:04 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-11-29 20:13 -0600
Re: Global Warming is not real science flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-29 21:25 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 17:08 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 15:43 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:14 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:24 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:31 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:41 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:50 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:54 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 04:06 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:39 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:06 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:31 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 18:12 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:05 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:12 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:22 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:37 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 13:09 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 21:51 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-24 03:01 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 20:37 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:49 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 08:51 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:55 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 10:58 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:50 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:08 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:33 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:24 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 11:03 -0700
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-25 18:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hge80.efa30w@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #268930 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/24/14, 9:06 PM, in article ghdue03.ap3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/24/14, 8:50 PM, in article hg803.apea3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>>> And you look, act, and speak like an irrational conspiracy theorist. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I, on the other hand, prefer rationality. >>>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL! >>>>>> >>>>> By all means, if you think a claim of mine is not rational then quote it >>>>> and >>>>> explain why. Back your claims with evidence and logic and reason. >>>> >>>>> But you will not. >>>> >>>> You've declared that I will not. I guess that ends it. >> >>> I have predicted... and did so correctly. It is not as if your irrationality >>> and insults are hard to predict. >> >> You "predicted"? Do you have psychic powers? >> > I predicted because your running is 100% predictable. I didn't ask *why* you predicted. I asked if you have psychic powers. Learn how to read.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-25 12:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D09A20F3.41C76%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #268982 |
On 11/25/14, 11:12 AM, in article hge80.efa30w@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/24/14, 9:06 PM, in article ghdue03.ap3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/24/14, 8:50 PM, in article hg803.apea3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> And you look, act, and speak like an irrational conspiracy theorist. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I, on the other hand, prefer rationality. >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL! >>>>>>> >>>>>> By all means, if you think a claim of mine is not rational then quote it >>>>>> and >>>>>> explain why. Back your claims with evidence and logic and reason. >>>>> >>>>>> But you will not. >>>>> >>>>> You've declared that I will not. I guess that ends it. >>> >>>> I have predicted... and did so correctly. It is not as if your >>>> irrationality >>>> and insults are hard to predict. >>> >>> You "predicted"? Do you have psychic powers? >>> > >> I predicted because your running is 100% predictable. > > I didn't ask *why* you predicted. I asked if you have psychic powers. > Learn how to read. > I predicted it because it is trivial to predict! You will run from any chance to back your accusations against me. You will not quote me doing as you accuse because your accusations are lies. It would be like me saying I can show a pig flying under its own power, without any clever tools - you could predict with 100% certainty that this is not going to happen. No psychic powers needed - just basic knowledge. Your failure to back your lies is no harder to predict than that. But you have gone to where the herd loves to go - meaningless meta-debates to avoid even talking about your accusations. Your false accusations. Accusations you are demonstrating with your actions you know are false. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-25 19:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bv83.fp3af@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #269011 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/25/14, 11:12 AM, in article hge80.efa30w@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/24/14, 9:06 PM, in article ghdue03.ap3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/24/14, 8:50 PM, in article hg803.apea3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> And you look, act, and speak like an irrational conspiracy theorist. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I, on the other hand, prefer rationality. >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LOL! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> By all means, if you think a claim of mine is not rational then quote it >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> explain why. Back your claims with evidence and logic and reason. >>>>>> >>>>>>> But you will not. >>>>>> >>>>>> You've declared that I will not. I guess that ends it. >>>> >>>>> I have predicted... and did so correctly. It is not as if your >>>>> irrationality >>>>> and insults are hard to predict. >>>> >>>> You "predicted"? Do you have psychic powers? >>>> >> >>> I predicted because your running is 100% predictable. >> >> I didn't ask *why* you predicted. I asked if you have psychic powers. >> Learn how to read. >> > I predicted it because it is trivial to predict! Damn! Once again, for the *Assburgers* in the room, I did not ask *why* you predicted. I asked you if you have psychic powers!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-25 12:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D09A24EF.41C90%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #269015 |
On 11/25/14, 12:12 PM, in article bv83.fp3af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> I didn't ask *why* you predicted. I asked if you have psychic powers. >>> Learn how to read. >>> >> I predicted it because it is trivial to predict! You will run from any chance >> to back your accusations against me. You will not quote me doing as you >> accuse because your accusations are lies. >> >> It would be like me saying I can show a pig flying under its own power, >> without any clever tools - you could predict with 100% certainty that this is >> not going to happen. No psychic powers needed - just basic knowledge. >> >> Your failure to back your lies is no harder to predict than that. >> >> But you have gone to where the herd loves to go - meaningless meta-debates to >> avoid even talking about your accusations. Your false accusations. >> Accusations you are demonstrating with your actions you know are false. > > Damn! Once again, for the *Assburgers* in the room, I did not ask > *why* you predicted. I asked you if you have psychic powers! Once again: more of your meta-debate circus and no support for your accusations of any wrong doing from me. No quotes of me lying about Linux, for example. Anyway, enough of backing your circus. Make your last words more interesting or be ignored. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-25 19:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bvhd83.g0a3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #269023 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/25/14, 12:12 PM, in article bv83.fp3af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> I didn't ask *why* you predicted. I asked if you have psychic powers. >>>> Learn how to read. >>>> >>> I predicted it because it is trivial to predict! You will run from any chance >>> to back your accusations against me. You will not quote me doing as you >>> accuse because your accusations are lies. >>> >>> It would be like me saying I can show a pig flying under its own power, >>> without any clever tools - you could predict with 100% certainty that this is >>> not going to happen. No psychic powers needed - just basic knowledge. >>> >>> Your failure to back your lies is no harder to predict than that. >>> >>> But you have gone to where the herd loves to go - meaningless meta-debates to >>> avoid even talking about your accusations. Your false accusations. >>> Accusations you are demonstrating with your actions you know are false. >> >> Damn! Once again, for the *Assburgers* in the room, I did not ask >> *why* you predicted. I asked you if you have psychic powers! > Once again: more of your meta-debate circus and no support for your > accusations of any wrong doing from me. No quotes of me lying about Linux, > for example. > Anyway, enough of backing your circus. Make your last words more interesting > or be ignored. So you choose to evade the question of whether or not you have psychic powers. I heard today that Bert Lahr's most famous costume sold for $3M. In a fair world, that costume would belong to you, the most deserving, instead of some rich collector.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-25 13:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D09A2FF9.41C9E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #269029 |
On 11/25/14, 12:37 PM, in article bvhd83.g0a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> But you have gone to where the herd loves to go - meaningless meta-debates >>>> to >>>> avoid even talking about your accusations. Your false accusations. >>>> Accusations you are demonstrating with your actions you know are false. >>> >>> Damn! Once again, for the *Assburgers* in the room, I did not ask >>> *why* you predicted. I asked you if you have psychic powers! > >> Once again: more of your meta-debate circus and no support for your >> accusations of any wrong doing from me. No quotes of me lying about Linux, >> for example. > >> Anyway, enough of backing your circus. Make your last words more interesting >> or be ignored. > > So you choose to evade the question of whether or not you have psychic > powers. I heard today that Bert Lahr's most famous costume sold for $3M. > In a fair world, that costume would belong to you, the most deserving, instead > of some rich collector. I have repeatedly told you that no psychic abilities are needed to figure out your bogus accusations are not just lies but that even you know they are lies. As does your herd. But you prefer to run from that and pretend it has not happened. Whatever... I am still giving you attention for your circus. For that I *am* guilty. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-25 21:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8rut.jae@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #269038 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/25/14, 12:37 PM, in article bvhd83.g0a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> But you have gone to where the herd loves to go - meaningless meta-debates >>>>> to >>>>> avoid even talking about your accusations. Your false accusations. >>>>> Accusations you are demonstrating with your actions you know are false. >>>> >>>> Damn! Once again, for the *Assburgers* in the room, I did not ask >>>> *why* you predicted. I asked you if you have psychic powers! >> >>> Once again: more of your meta-debate circus and no support for your >>> accusations of any wrong doing from me. No quotes of me lying about Linux, >>> for example. >> >>> Anyway, enough of backing your circus. Make your last words more interesting >>> or be ignored. >> >> So you choose to evade the question of whether or not you have psychic >> powers. I heard today that Bert Lahr's most famous costume sold for $3M. >> In a fair world, that costume would belong to you, the most deserving, instead >> of some rich collector. > I have repeatedly told you that no psychic abilities are needed to figure > out your bogus accusations are not just lies but that even you know they are > lies. > As does your herd. > But you prefer to run from that and pretend it has not happened. > Whatever... I am still giving you attention for your circus. For that I *am* > guilty. Still no answer to the question, "Do you have psychic powers?" Are you ashamed that you do not have pyschic powers, or are you ashamed that you do? There's no shame in being special, Snit. Go ahead. Own it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-23 15:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D097AA63.41A37%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #268549 |
On 11/23/14, 12:14 PM, in article m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: > > >> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. > > > The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as > demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. * 9/11 * Sandy Hook denail * Man walking on the moon hoax * Global warming denial * JFK's assassination * Chemtrails * AIDS being through vaccinations * Anti-vax fears * Exaggeration of GMO fears * Secret society of your choice running the world * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not kernels of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), but the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of these are amazing. > I do wonder how you morons pick and choose which events are "hoaxes". I > think your one and only criteria is whatever gets you the most attention > (which is the same way a 3rd grader chooses whether to pee or poop his > pants and tell everyone). What third grader does that? Ew. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 03:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bvndu92.dw0@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #268579 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/23/14, 12:14 PM, in article m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" > <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: >> >> >>> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. >> >> >> The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as >> demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. > The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. > * 9/11 > * Sandy Hook denail > * Man walking on the moon hoax > * Global warming denial > * JFK's assassination > * Chemtrails > * AIDS being through vaccinations > * Anti-vax fears > * Exaggeration of GMO fears > * Secret society of your choice running the world > * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... > Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these > ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and > largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not kernels > of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), but > the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of > these are amazing. I can't believe you forgot about Ebola, or MH370/MH17. > >> I do wonder how you morons pick and choose which events are "hoaxes". I >> think your one and only criteria is whatever gets you the most attention >> (which is the same way a 3rd grader chooses whether to pee or poop his >> pants and tell everyone). > What third grader does that? Ew. Dufus was just remembering his own antics at age 8 and projecting them on the general population. (Damn, Dufus! That is gross!)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-23 20:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D097F60E.41A61%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #268607 |
On 11/23/14, 8:01 PM, in article bvndu92.dw0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/23/14, 12:14 PM, in article m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" >> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >>> On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: >>> >>> >>>> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. >>> >>> >>> The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as >>> demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. > >> The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. > >> * 9/11 >> * Sandy Hook denail >> * Man walking on the moon hoax >> * Global warming denial >> * JFK's assassination >> * Chemtrails >> * AIDS being through vaccinations >> * Anti-vax fears >> * Exaggeration of GMO fears >> * Secret society of your choice running the world >> * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... > >> Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these >> ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and >> largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not kernels >> of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), but >> the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of >> these are amazing. > > I can't believe you forgot about Ebola, or MH370/MH17. I do not have a list of every insane conspiracy theory people push. :) ... -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 08:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <m4vd0i$a0c$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #268611 |
On 23/11/2014 10:37 PM, Snit wrote: > On 11/23/14, 8:01 PM, in article bvndu92.dw0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/23/14, 12:14 PM, in article m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" >>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> >>>> On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. >>>> >>>> >>>> The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as >>>> demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. >> >>> The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. >> >>> * 9/11 >>> * Sandy Hook denail >>> * Man walking on the moon hoax >>> * Global warming denial >>> * JFK's assassination >>> * Chemtrails >>> * AIDS being through vaccinations >>> * Anti-vax fears >>> * Exaggeration of GMO fears >>> * Secret society of your choice running the world >>> * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... >> >>> Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these >>> ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and >>> largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not kernels >>> of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), but >>> the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of >>> these are amazing. >> >> I can't believe you forgot about Ebola, or MH370/MH17. > > I do not have a list of every insane conspiracy theory people push. :) You do have to admit that it's very fishy that two Malaysian Airlines plane were used in major events this year. One of their planes disappeared without a trace and another, identical plane, was shot down over Ukraine. -- Sir Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 08:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <17biwk0fax2a2.k4hp2l93h5p3$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #268623 |
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:49:20 -0500, Sir Slimer wrote: > On 23/11/2014 10:37 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 11/23/14, 8:01 PM, in article bvndu92.dw0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/23/14, 12:14 PM, in article m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" >>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as >>>>> demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. >>> >>>> The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. >>> >>>> * 9/11 >>>> * Sandy Hook denail >>>> * Man walking on the moon hoax >>>> * Global warming denial >>>> * JFK's assassination >>>> * Chemtrails >>>> * AIDS being through vaccinations >>>> * Anti-vax fears >>>> * Exaggeration of GMO fears >>>> * Secret society of your choice running the world >>>> * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... >>> >>>> Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these >>>> ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and >>>> largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not kernels >>>> of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), but >>>> the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of >>>> these are amazing. >>> >>> I can't believe you forgot about Ebola, or MH370/MH17. >> >> I do not have a list of every insane conspiracy theory people push. :) > > You do have to admit that it's very fishy that two Malaysian Airlines > plane were used in major events this year. One of their planes > disappeared without a trace and another, identical plane, was shot down > over Ukraine. The pane shot down is explainable. The missing plane is a mystery that has not been solved. With all the technology we have these days I wonder why they can't seem to find that plane? -- flatfish+++ Linux: The Operating System That Put The City Of Munich Out Of Business. Before Switching To Linux Read This: http://linuxfonts.narod.ru/why.linux.is.not.ready.for.the.desktop.current.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 08:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <m4vdcv$bvu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #268624 |
On 24/11/2014 8:51 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:49:20 -0500, Sir Slimer wrote: > >> On 23/11/2014 10:37 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 11/23/14, 8:01 PM, in article bvndu92.dw0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/23/14, 12:14 PM, in article m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" >>>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as >>>>>> demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. >>>> >>>>> The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. >>>> >>>>> * 9/11 >>>>> * Sandy Hook denail >>>>> * Man walking on the moon hoax >>>>> * Global warming denial >>>>> * JFK's assassination >>>>> * Chemtrails >>>>> * AIDS being through vaccinations >>>>> * Anti-vax fears >>>>> * Exaggeration of GMO fears >>>>> * Secret society of your choice running the world >>>>> * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... >>>> >>>>> Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these >>>>> ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and >>>>> largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not kernels >>>>> of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), but >>>>> the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of >>>>> these are amazing. >>>> >>>> I can't believe you forgot about Ebola, or MH370/MH17. >>> >>> I do not have a list of every insane conspiracy theory people push. :) >> >> You do have to admit that it's very fishy that two Malaysian Airlines >> plane were used in major events this year. One of their planes >> disappeared without a trace and another, identical plane, was shot down >> over Ukraine. > > The pane shot down is explainable. > The missing plane is a mystery that has not been solved. > With all the technology we have these days I wonder why they can't > seem to find that plane? I honestly get the impression that the plane was basically taken out of service to be re-used at a future date in an effort to push a political agenda. Clearly, someone out there wants a war with Russia and World Wars were initiated by much smaller events than a plane being shot down. -- Sir Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 09:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1i2gsh256bjnt.3vpfvauji6o4.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #268627 |
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:55:58 -0500, Sir Slimer wrote: > On 24/11/2014 8:51 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:49:20 -0500, Sir Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 23/11/2014 10:37 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 11/23/14, 8:01 PM, in article bvndu92.dw0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/23/14, 12:14 PM, in article m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" >>>>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as >>>>>>> demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. >>>>> >>>>>> The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. >>>>> >>>>>> * 9/11 >>>>>> * Sandy Hook denail >>>>>> * Man walking on the moon hoax >>>>>> * Global warming denial >>>>>> * JFK's assassination >>>>>> * Chemtrails >>>>>> * AIDS being through vaccinations >>>>>> * Anti-vax fears >>>>>> * Exaggeration of GMO fears >>>>>> * Secret society of your choice running the world >>>>>> * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... >>>>> >>>>>> Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these >>>>>> ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and >>>>>> largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not kernels >>>>>> of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), but >>>>>> the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of >>>>>> these are amazing. >>>>> >>>>> I can't believe you forgot about Ebola, or MH370/MH17. >>>> >>>> I do not have a list of every insane conspiracy theory people push. :) >>> >>> You do have to admit that it's very fishy that two Malaysian Airlines >>> plane were used in major events this year. One of their planes >>> disappeared without a trace and another, identical plane, was shot down >>> over Ukraine. >> >> The pane shot down is explainable. >> The missing plane is a mystery that has not been solved. >> With all the technology we have these days I wonder why they can't >> seem to find that plane? > > I honestly get the impression that the plane was basically taken out of > service to be re-used at a future date in an effort to push a political > agenda. Clearly, someone out there wants a war with Russia and World > Wars were initiated by much smaller events than a plane being shot down. Yea,like the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo. -- flatfish+++ Linux: The Operating System That Put The City Of Munich Out Of Business. Before Switching To Linux Read This: http://linuxfonts.narod.ru/why.linux.is.not.ready.for.the.desktop.current.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 10:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <m4vkj4$9bf$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #268631 |
On 24/11/2014 9:19 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:55:58 -0500, Sir Slimer wrote: > >> On 24/11/2014 8:51 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: >>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:49:20 -0500, Sir Slimer wrote: >>> >>>> On 23/11/2014 10:37 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 11/23/14, 8:01 PM, in article bvndu92.dw0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/23/14, 12:14 PM, in article m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" >>>>>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as >>>>>>>> demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. >>>>>> >>>>>>> The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. >>>>>> >>>>>>> * 9/11 >>>>>>> * Sandy Hook denail >>>>>>> * Man walking on the moon hoax >>>>>>> * Global warming denial >>>>>>> * JFK's assassination >>>>>>> * Chemtrails >>>>>>> * AIDS being through vaccinations >>>>>>> * Anti-vax fears >>>>>>> * Exaggeration of GMO fears >>>>>>> * Secret society of your choice running the world >>>>>>> * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... >>>>>> >>>>>>> Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these >>>>>>> ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and >>>>>>> largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not kernels >>>>>>> of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), but >>>>>>> the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of >>>>>>> these are amazing. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can't believe you forgot about Ebola, or MH370/MH17. >>>>> >>>>> I do not have a list of every insane conspiracy theory people push. :) >>>> >>>> You do have to admit that it's very fishy that two Malaysian Airlines >>>> plane were used in major events this year. One of their planes >>>> disappeared without a trace and another, identical plane, was shot down >>>> over Ukraine. >>> >>> The pane shot down is explainable. >>> The missing plane is a mystery that has not been solved. >>> With all the technology we have these days I wonder why they can't >>> seem to find that plane? >> >> I honestly get the impression that the plane was basically taken out of >> service to be re-used at a future date in an effort to push a political >> agenda. Clearly, someone out there wants a war with Russia and World >> Wars were initiated by much smaller events than a plane being shot down. > > Yea,like the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo. That's the reason they gave for the beginning of the World War even though it is now very clear that there were multiple issues. Either way, such a small event is easy for the masses to understand and therefore easy to exploit, just like a plane full of innocents being show down over a contested region by the "enemy." -- Sir Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 08:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e42ba898-f2d3-4205-9b74-cf19fa565a4e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #268627 |
On Monday, November 24, 2014 6:56:00 AM UTC-7, Sir Slimer wrote: > On 24/11/2014 8:51 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:49:20 -0500, Sir Slimer wrote: > > > >> On 23/11/2014 10:37 PM, Snit wrote: > >>> On 11/23/14, 8:01 PM, in article bvndu92.dw0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>> On 11/23/14, 12:14 PM, in article m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" > >>>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as > >>>>>> demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. > >>>> > >>>>> The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. > >>>> > >>>>> * 9/11 > >>>>> * Sandy Hook denail > >>>>> * Man walking on the moon hoax > >>>>> * Global warming denial > >>>>> * JFK's assassination > >>>>> * Chemtrails > >>>>> * AIDS being through vaccinations > >>>>> * Anti-vax fears > >>>>> * Exaggeration of GMO fears > >>>>> * Secret society of your choice running the world > >>>>> * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... > >>>> > >>>>> Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these > >>>>> ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and > >>>>> largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not kernels > >>>>> of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), but > >>>>> the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of > >>>>> these are amazing. > >>>> > >>>> I can't believe you forgot about Ebola, or MH370/MH17. > >>> > >>> I do not have a list of every insane conspiracy theory people push. :) > >> > >> You do have to admit that it's very fishy that two Malaysian Airlines > >> plane were used in major events this year. One of their planes > >> disappeared without a trace and another, identical plane, was shot down > >> over Ukraine. > > > > The pane shot down is explainable. > > The missing plane is a mystery that has not been solved. > > With all the technology we have these days I wonder why they can't > > seem to find that plane? > > I honestly get the impression that the plane was basically taken out of > service to be re-used at a future date in an effort to push a political > agenda. So they killed all the passengers? Or better... they never actually got on the plane and all the people complaining are 'actors'? Wait, I know... Elvis came down in an alien craft and took them all to his new digs west of Pluto. LOL! > Clearly, someone out there wants a war with Russia Putin and the old guard clearly don't want surrounding areas that were once tied to the motherland to have as much say in their own foreign policy. TFB. There already is a 'war' with Russia... they're loosing. (cue up more U.S. gov't hatred by Slimer)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 12:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.2edd30152e00a230989698@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #268640 |
In article <e42ba898-f2d3-4205-9b74- cf19fa565a4e@googlegroups.com>, fretwizzer@gmail.com says... > > On Monday, November 24, 2014 6:56:00 AM UTC-7, Sir Slimer wrote: > > On 24/11/2014 8:51 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:49:20 -0500, Sir Slimer wrote: > > > > > >> On 23/11/2014 10:37 PM, Snit wrote: > > >>> On 11/23/14, 8:01 PM, in article bvndu92.dw0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > > >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > >>>>> On 11/23/14, 12:14 PM, in article m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" > > >>>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>>> On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as > > >>>>>> demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. > > >>>> > > >>>>> The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. > > >>>> > > >>>>> * 9/11 > > >>>>> * Sandy Hook denail > > >>>>> * Man walking on the moon hoax > > >>>>> * Global warming denial > > >>>>> * JFK's assassination > > >>>>> * Chemtrails > > >>>>> * AIDS being through vaccinations > > >>>>> * Anti-vax fears > > >>>>> * Exaggeration of GMO fears > > >>>>> * Secret society of your choice running the world > > >>>>> * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... > > >>>> > > >>>>> Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these > > >>>>> ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and > > >>>>> largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not kernels > > >>>>> of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), but > > >>>>> the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of > > >>>>> these are amazing. > > >>>> > > >>>> I can't believe you forgot about Ebola, or MH370/MH17. > > >>> > > >>> I do not have a list of every insane conspiracy theory people push. :) > > >> > > >> You do have to admit that it's very fishy that two Malaysian Airlines > > >> plane were used in major events this year. One of their planes > > >> disappeared without a trace and another, identical plane, was shot down This is a snit forgery.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 12:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D098D637.41ABD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #268623 |
On 11/24/14, 6:49 AM, in article m4vd0i$a0c$2@dont-email.me, "Sir Slimer" <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>>> The conspiracy theorists are, to say the least, interesting. >>> >>>> * 9/11 >>>> * Sandy Hook denail >>>> * Man walking on the moon hoax >>>> * Global warming denial >>>> * JFK's assassination >>>> * Chemtrails >>>> * AIDS being through vaccinations >>>> * Anti-vax fears >>>> * Exaggeration of GMO fears >>>> * Secret society of your choice running the world >>>> * Obama being a foreign born, Muslim, Marxist, whatever... >>> >>>> Just some of the ones that come to mind. When I hear people pushing these >>>> ideas I pretty much roll my eyes. Does not mean there are not powerful and >>>> largely secret groups that have a lot of power or that there are not >>>> kernels >>>> of truth to some of the others (I think we should be careful with GMOs), >>>> but >>>> the fear-mongering and massive conspiracies people concoct around each of >>>> these are amazing. >>> >>> I can't believe you forgot about Ebola, or MH370/MH17. >> >> I do not have a list of every insane conspiracy theory people push. :) > > You do have to admit that it's very fishy that two Malaysian Airlines > plane were used in major events this year. One of their planes > disappeared without a trace and another, identical plane, was shot down > over Ukraine. I openly admit I do not know all of what is going on with that... what I do know is I am not jumping to any unsupported conclusions. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 08:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <90ed8c74-c818-4ece-9cae-923420db8bc5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #268505 |
On Saturday, November 22, 2014 9:22:04 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://www.moneynews.com/mkt-news/Scientist-Confesses-Global-Warming-a-$22-B/2014/11/17/id/607827/?snit-falls-for-every-liberal-scam > > > One leading scientist -- Kevin Trenberth -- admitted "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty we can't." A travesty simply because they were worried about losing their government funding. > > > In another email, Dr. Phil Jones -- a leading "global warming" advocate at the United Nations -- admitted that he used "Mike's Nature trick" in a 1999 graph to "hide the decline" in temperature. > > > And another study done by Stephen Goddard at Real Science revealed just how ridiculous "climate scientists" can get with data manipulation. Here is what he had to say: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been "adjusting" its record by replacing real temperatures with data "fabricated" by computer models." > > > > Some people are as stupid as the left wing politicians need them to be. > > Global Warming/Climate Change is definitely a scam, but couldn't you find > a better reference than some guy hawking his newsletter? > > <quote> > That's a Total Velue of $180 . . . in Return for Your $5 Contribution Today. > ... > To be clear, the minimum contribution when you join the Cold Truth > Initiative is $5. But you are allowed to contribute more . . . > </quote> > > It is interesting though that on this issue you decide *not* to rely on > the same appeal-to-authority fallacy that you use to deny the Sandy Hook > hoax. Where did my forger do what you're suggesting? More importantly, why do you keep labeling as a "hoax" something that has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 12:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.2edd30429f98c0a3989699@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #268638 |
In article <90ed8c74-c818-4ece-9cae-923420db8bc5 @googlegroups.com>, fretwizzer@gmail.com says... > > On Saturday, November 22, 2014 9:22:04 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: > > Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> wrote: > > > http://www.moneynews.com/mkt-news/Scientist-Confesses-Global-Warming-a-$22-B/2014/11/17/id/607827/?snit-falls-for-every-liberal-scam > > > > > One leading scientist -- Kevin Trenberth -- admitted "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty we can't." A travesty simply because they were worried about losing their government funding. > > > > > In another email, Dr. Phil Jones -- a leading "global warming" advocate at the United Nations -- admitted that he used "Mike's Nature trick" in a 1999 graph to "hide the decline" in temperature. > > > > > And another study done by Stephen Goddard at Real Science revealed just how ridiculous "climate scientists" can get with data manipulation. Here is what he had to say: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been "adjusting" its record by replacing real temperatures with data "fabricated" by computer models." > > > > > > > Some people are as stupid as the left wing politicians need them to be. > > > > Global Warming/Climate Change is definitely a scam, but couldn't you find > > a better reference than some guy hawking his newsletter? > > > > <quote> > > That's a Total Velue of $180 . . . in Return for Your $5 Contribution Today. > > ... > > To be clear, the minimum contribution when you join the Cold Truth > > Initiative is $5. But you are allowed to contribute more . . . > > </quote> > > > > It is interesting though that on this issue you decide *not* to rely on > > the same appeal-to-authority fallacy that you use to deny the Sandy Hook > > hoax. > > Where did my forger do what you're suggesting? More importantly, why do you keep labeling as a "hoax" something that has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt? This is a snit forgery.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web