Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #412962

Re: Democrat logic

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Democrat logic
Date	2017-05-04 23:46 +0000
Organization	O.W.L.
Message-ID	<acfa390ab.bu4@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <oees0p$fp4$1@dont-email.me> <av93agu9.3pp@rooftop.invalid> <oef9o5$qq8$1@dont-email.me> <szvi03.3f@rooftop.invalid> <oeg9sg$oh9$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>>> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1. Comey and Wikileaks raised doubts in the minds of people who
>>>>>>    were inclined to vote for Hillary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million votes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You're a Democrat?
>>> 
>>> Was just teasing.
>>> 
>>>> No, but if (1) is true, how does that lead to (2)?
>>> 
>>> One can speculate that she would have won by even more votes if not
>>> for the massive ratfucking she received.  And that could have tipped the
>>> balance in some key states.
>>
>> And one can speculate that if Comey had not been bending over backwards
>> to keep from destroying her campaign she would have been indicted for
>> perjury and mishandling classified email.
> 
> Nah, she didn't do anything even close to what Petraeus and Flynn did,
> and they basically walked.
> 

Petraeus was moonstruck and careless.  Flynn lied to his boss's sidekick
and got fired for it.  The question of whether he lied on his background
interview still under investigation afaik.  I know he has claimed that
the investigators knew about his Russian ties.  Clinton, on the other
hand, lied under oath to Congress multiple times and negligently handled
classified emails multiple times.  Peons have gone to jail for far less.

>>> We'll never know.  Her campaign strategy was poor anyway... who the hell
>>> uses the competition's name in a campaign slogan?  And who picks a massively
>>> tarnished candidate from the git-go?
>>
>> A corrupt political party.  She owned the Democrat Party and picked herself.
> 
> Actually, I have heard talk that her heart wasn't quite in it.
> That she entered the race out of a sense of duty.
> 

I heard she went into a rage and had to be restrained for a week or so
after the loss, so it's hard to believe that it she just ran out of
a sense of duty.

> I wouldn't do it, even were I qualified.
> 

If you're at least 35, a natural-born citizen, and have lived in the 
US for 14 years, then you're qualified.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Democrat logic owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-04 03:04 +0000
  Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 20:24 -0700
  Re: Democrat logic Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-05-04 05:19 -0400
    Re: Democrat logic owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-04 11:58 +0000
      Re: Democrat logic Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-05-04 09:13 -0400
        Re: Democrat logic chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-04 08:28 -0500
          Re: Democrat logic William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2017-05-04 14:37 +0100
            Re: Democrat logic chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-04 08:50 -0500
            Re: Democrat logic RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 15:39 +0000
              Re: Democrat logic Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-05-04 11:40 -0500
              Re: Democrat logic Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-05-04 18:19 -0400
                Re: Democrat logic William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2017-05-05 13:32 +0100
                Re: Democrat logic RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 12:39 +0000
                Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-05 11:07 -0700
        Re: Democrat logic owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-04 14:42 +0000
          Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:59 -0700
          Re: Democrat logic Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 11:17 -0700
          Re: Democrat logic Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-05-04 18:22 -0400
            Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 16:26 -0700
            Re: Democrat logic owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-04 23:46 +0000
              Re: Democrat logic Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-05-05 05:26 -0400
        Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:57 -0700
      Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:56 -0700
  Re: Democrat logic DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-05-04 09:53 -0400
    Re: Democrat logic owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-04 14:51 +0000
    Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:58 -0700
  Re: Democrat logic Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-05-04 09:57 -0400
    Re: Democrat logic Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-05-04 10:00 -0500
    Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:58 -0700

csiph-web