Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #412954

Re: Democrat logic

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Democrat logic
Date	2017-05-04 16:26 -0700
Message-ID	<D531069B.A37BD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <oees0p$fp4$1@dont-email.me> <av93agu9.3pp@rooftop.invalid> <oef9o5$qq8$1@dont-email.me> <szvi03.3f@rooftop.invalid> <oeg9sg$oh9$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/4/17, 3:22 PM, in article oeg9sg$oh9$2@dont-email.me, "Chris Ahlstrom"
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:

> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>>> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1. Comey and Wikileaks raised doubts in the minds of people who
>>>>>>    were inclined to vote for Hillary.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2. Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million votes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You're a Democrat?
>>> 
>>> Was just teasing.
>>> 
>>>> No, but if (1) is true, how does that lead to (2)?
>>> 
>>> One can speculate that she would have won by even more votes if not
>>> for the massive ratfucking she received.  And that could have tipped the
>>> balance in some key states.
>> 
>> And one can speculate that if Comey had not been bending over backwards
>> to keep from destroying her campaign she would have been indicted for
>> perjury and mishandling classified email.
> 
> Nah, she didn't do anything even close to what Petraeus and Flynn did,
> and they basically walked.

Petraeus and Flynn admitted to wrong doing. That was a large part of what
got them. Clinton lied more than they did so she got fewer consequences.

What a great system of justice we have... but it is not Comey's fault. And
it is not as if he went soft on her.

>>> We'll never know.  Her campaign strategy was poor anyway... who the hell
>>> uses the competition's name in a campaign slogan?  And who picks a massively
>>> tarnished candidate from the git-go?
>> 
>> A corrupt political party.  She owned the Democrat Party and picked herself.
> 
> Actually, I have heard talk that her heart wasn't quite in it.
> That she entered the race out of a sense of duty.

The Democrats should have had Sanders as their candidate... and if they did
he would be president now. We would be MUCH better off.
 
> I wouldn't do it, even were I qualified.

I have no interest in the job.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Democrat logic owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-04 03:04 +0000
  Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 20:24 -0700
  Re: Democrat logic Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-05-04 05:19 -0400
    Re: Democrat logic owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-04 11:58 +0000
      Re: Democrat logic Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-05-04 09:13 -0400
        Re: Democrat logic chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-04 08:28 -0500
          Re: Democrat logic William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2017-05-04 14:37 +0100
            Re: Democrat logic chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-04 08:50 -0500
            Re: Democrat logic RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 15:39 +0000
              Re: Democrat logic Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-05-04 11:40 -0500
              Re: Democrat logic Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-05-04 18:19 -0400
                Re: Democrat logic William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2017-05-05 13:32 +0100
                Re: Democrat logic RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 12:39 +0000
                Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-05 11:07 -0700
        Re: Democrat logic owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-04 14:42 +0000
          Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:59 -0700
          Re: Democrat logic Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 11:17 -0700
          Re: Democrat logic Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-05-04 18:22 -0400
            Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 16:26 -0700
            Re: Democrat logic owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-04 23:46 +0000
              Re: Democrat logic Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-05-05 05:26 -0400
        Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:57 -0700
      Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:56 -0700
  Re: Democrat logic DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-05-04 09:53 -0400
    Re: Democrat logic owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-04 14:51 +0000
    Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:58 -0700
  Re: Democrat logic Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-05-04 09:57 -0400
    Re: Democrat logic Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-05-04 10:00 -0500
    Re: Democrat logic Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:58 -0700

csiph-web