Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #172069
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates |
| Date | Sat, 6 Apr 2013 12:52:09 +0100 |
| Organization | Dumb Willie Boaster @ Llareggub Inc. |
| Lines | 47 |
| Message-ID | <9se53a-m7f.ln1@wp.alpha-one.linuxorg> (permalink) |
| References | <kj7kgo$l9f$1@dont-email.me> <20130331084434.973@usenet.drumscum.be> <CD7E00D3.183E6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <20130401174031.987@usenet.drumscum.be> <CD7F37F2.184B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <20130404002159.378@usenet.drumscum.be> <CD820DCD.186CE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <20130406075428.108@usenet.drumscum.be> <kjov3o$cur$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net BHm0G3qnsjuQTFvkzSgs3wsv0FT59LnJdKQZWnTYLzkPmHHl5l |
| X-Orig-Path | wp.alpha-one.linuxorg!not-for-mail |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:qzrN/gIkeoC9HJZzgz7R01ahtJg= |
| User-Agent | XPN/1.2.6 (Street Spirit ; Linux) |
| X-COLA-Trolls | Listed at- http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| X-COLA-Trolls | Are teminated with extreme prejudice. |
| X-Face | `5p?S@A"Hj=JY)*EuzB=o4pQ-H];}&qS[Z8OM|sCiN!hSBk7v.$w\}p`x$[DWO/EyVN*g+,)KcwTz1,):c:{VxpULJ*RoJuTkL=ZeBG9U%q:tM/~xY**Y$V<*@*)VL#%_.w+3^V;D~d/O_fj//RB},D+X`I.Q{`xOzaLd.]C3O_6<H-G4He#\m+B&A)'EDsEy}iU'1A_[@=&+fS/f"/qL232/EV|$b=3]v |
| X-OS | Scientific Linux 6.2 (x86_64) Kernel 3.7.1-2.1 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:172069 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > After swilling some grog, TomB belched this bit o' wisdom: > >> On 2013-04-03, the following emerged from the brain of Snit: >>> >>> I know I do not want people to give up and settle on a single >>> environment! >> >> So with the situation of offering two "big" desktop environments that >> are very different (in fact more different today than ever): what >> would *you* suggest to make it possible for an entire distro, offering >> both environments and their applications (plus even other environments >> and applications), to "be a unified system" with regards to the UI? >> >> Remember: you have already said that Gnome and KDE can still be >> totally different and you don't want any choice removed. > > My computers systems are unified systems of XFce or Fluxbox running apps > based on the GTK+2, GTK+3, Qt 3, Qt 4, Fox, ncurses, slang, ALSA, and > JACK toolkits, with wallpaper served up by feh, Nitrogen, or xfdesktop. > > How dare I call this a "unified system"? Because I can throw the > "system" wrapper around any goddam set of things I want to, and it > becomes one goddam environment that suits me just fine. Quite so. However you can bet that Michael Snit Glasser will *still* go on about a "unified system". JHC on a bike, what a boring s-o-b he is. -- Borg-Cola: Not the choice of the next generation Micro$oft, the company that makes spreading malware easy. Microsoft exec Ron Markezich was quoted saying that for every $1 companies spend on Microsoft software, they need to spend $6 getting it to work right. -- April 2011 SanFrancisco Chronical -- "We have no intention of shipping another bloated OS and shoving it down the throats of our users." -- Paul Maritz, Microsoft group vice president -- What's bad about Micro$oft: http://www.kmfms.com/whatsbad.html
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2013-04-03 22:26 +0000
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-03 16:48 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 06:08 +0000
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 00:24 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 14:01 +0200
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-06 08:33 -0400
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 13:53 +0100
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-06 08:57 -0400
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 14:05 +0100
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 11:53 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 11:52 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 11:50 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 11:35 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 23:44 +0000
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 18:15 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2013-04-08 16:56 +0000
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-08 10:39 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-08 15:31 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-07 08:49 +0200
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 09:06 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2013-04-07 17:02 +0000
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-07 10:43 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-08 07:36 -0500
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2013-04-08 11:28 -0500
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-08 09:44 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2013-04-06 14:49 -0400
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 12:04 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 20:16 +0000
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 13:28 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2013-04-06 22:56 +0100
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 15:09 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-08 07:45 -0500
chrisv proves his cult-like tendencies again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-08 06:57 -0700
Re: chrisv proves his cult-like tendencies again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-08 07:03 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2013-04-06 07:00 -0400
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2013-04-06 12:52 +0100
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 11:48 -0700
Re: Snit posts decent article on Linux Advocates Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-06 11:46 -0700
csiph-web