Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #20672
| From | Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Permissions |
| Date | 2015-07-02 20:26 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <5595D6BE.8060703@yahoo.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <55951fc3$0$6722$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com> <559552B9.7010108@yahoo.com> <30oapatfcm4sfiqhavdo7eh8pplbvdpi63@4ax.com> <55959910.2070107@yahoo.com> <3rabpatplmophcf57ebbpi5rm0sj5di2p2@4ax.com> |
On 7/2/2015 6:08 PM, J0HNS0N wrote:
> Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> wrote:
...
>> Some people I
>> know with iPhones are paying more than ten times that much, albeit for
>> better phones and services that I don't need.
>
> iPhones have nothing to do with it.
>
> The service cost per line is exactly the same for my wife's iPhone as
> it is for my Android phone.
>
> My *guess* would be that the super cheap plans don't offer the iPhone
> because those who go for that type of service likely couldn't or don't
> want to afford an iPhone.
That's interesting. I haven't kept up with the times. It used to be
that iPhones could only be had with certain services that sold at
premium prices. But I guess now you can mix and match iPhone with
whatever service you want. Device and service are much more de-coupled
than they used to be.
...
> But I can honestly say that I have never gotten any spam from anybody
> that I can trace back to Google in the many years I've been using
> them.
>
> That's more than I can say for many businesses I have to pay to use
> (car dealerships, hotels, theme parks etc). For those I am very happy
> to have Gmail's exceptional filter services to kill their spam.
That's a good point. The great bulk of the spam I get is from simple
minded crooks who it's hard to imagine dealing with Google.
The main nuisance is that, after doing a search for a product on Google,
or clicking on an adsense ad, one sees ads for that product for many
months after. It's a little annoying but, in all fairness, I guess it's
no worse than seeing random ads.
It is creepy however to realize that, when you turn on "location
services", and even when you don't, Google will start tracking you and
presenting ads for nearby locations. It's like having a guy follow you
wherever you go and make notes on every place you've been. He doesn't
hurt you or interfere with what you're doing, but he's always there,
accumulating his record of your life.
I notice too that Google can be very demanding and, I would say, rather
unscrupulous, about getting our permission to do things. When I turn on
location services I get a prompt asking me to allow Google to track me.
On my phone (LG34c Android 4.4) there's also a checkbox that says:
"Don't ask me this again." If I check the box and say no, I still get
prompted every single time. However if I say yes, I never get prompted
again.
There are other things like that where they make it ultra easy to get
your consent to tracking but much harder to remove that consent. It's
not just for Google services. Something as simple as using Google
authentication for a third party service can present you with a prompt
that effectively says you have to let Google track you forever if you
want Google to authenticate you just this one time. The language is
ambiguous. It doesn't say explicitly that Google is going to track you
forever. But there is no language limiting what you've agreed to.
And now that we know that the NSA and Homeland Security have been
getting this information from Google, Apple, and the others, it's
especially freaky to know that all this info is being accumulated.
Someone told me that, when you back up your phone to Google, your
unencrypted WiFi passwords are part of the backup data. When NSA gets
them they can plug right into your WiFi router if they have a mind to
and snoop on all of your Internet traffic.
>> However, if you think it's appropriate for Google, Apple, and Microsoft
>> to do whatever they want, including selling undisclosed parts of our
>> information to undisclosed buyers for undisclosed purposes, then surely
>> it must also be appropriate for us to exercise the same freedom in how
>> we use their services. That includes using our own security software,
>> like firewalls, to stymie their intrusions.
>
> Amen. Knock yourself out brother!! And good luck to you.
Thank you. And vice versa.
> BTW do you use a charge card. Did you know they do the same thing?
I'm not sure what is included in "the same thing". However, when push
comes to shove, I know that we're each dealing with companies and
institutions that are immeasurably more powerful than we are as
individuals. If Google and Apple, AT&T and Verizon, VISA and
Mastercard, are well-behaved with our data, that's great, but there's
precious little stopping them from being ill-behaved, and precious
little transparency enabling us to find out what they're doing. What I
think we really need is for all Internet users to band together and
elect congressmen and senators who will create laws protecting our
privacy and our rights as consumers.
Alan
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Permissions F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-01 23:22 +1000
Re: Permissions J0HNS0N <12J0HNSON1022@92300nomail.com> - 2015-07-01 15:08 -0700
Re: Permissions Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-02 16:03 -0400
Re: Permissions J0HNS0N <12J0HNSON1022@92300nomail.com> - 2015-07-02 15:08 -0700
Re: Permissions Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-02 20:26 -0400
Re: Permissions F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-03 11:02 +1000
Re: Permissions J0HNS0N <12J0HNSON1022@92300nomail.com> - 2015-07-02 23:03 -0700
Re: Permissions The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 18:39 -0700
Re: Permissions J0HNS0N <12J0HNSON1022@92300nomail.com> - 2015-07-02 23:03 -0700
Re: Permissions Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-03 19:08 +0000
Re: Permissions F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-03 11:04 +1000
csiph-web