Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.misc > #9421 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-08 13:49 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-11 18:32 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 75 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.misc
[CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-11-08 13:49 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-11-09 09:22 +0300
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-11-09 09:22 +0200
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-09 11:10 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-09 12:07 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-11-09 12:08 +0100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-09 14:13 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-09 14:23 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-10 14:22 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-11-10 18:18 +0100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-10 18:25 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-10 19:35 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "John Jackson" <jj@nospam.com> - 2015-11-11 06:47 +1100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-10 21:15 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "John Jackson" <jj@nospam.com> - 2015-11-11 12:15 +1100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-11 10:19 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-11 06:23 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> - 2015-11-10 19:51 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-11-11 00:31 +0100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-11-11 08:01 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-11-11 12:23 +0100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 pechter@pechter.dyndns.org (William Pechter) - 2015-11-12 03:27 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-12 13:23 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-11 14:39 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 05:51 +1100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 06:28 +1100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-09 16:24 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-10 14:22 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-11-10 16:01 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-11-10 18:20 +0100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-11-10 18:49 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-11 14:39 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-11-11 16:31 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-11 18:05 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-11-11 18:20 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-11 23:24 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-12 14:04 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 pechter@pechter.dyndns.org (William Pechter) - 2015-11-12 14:47 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-13 13:58 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-11-13 15:44 +0100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-14 13:56 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "John Jackson" <jj@nospam.com> - 2015-11-15 04:44 +1100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-11-14 10:15 -0800
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2015-11-14 10:53 -0800
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-11-16 14:47 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-11-12 15:26 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-11-10 17:52 +0100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-11-09 20:17 +0100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 hankvc@blackhole.lostwells.org (Hank) - 2015-11-10 02:21 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-10 14:22 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-09 14:13 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 05:31 +1100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-10 14:22 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-11-10 18:05 +0100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-11 10:52 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> - 2015-11-11 11:40 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-11 14:01 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 06:25 +1100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-11-10 23:19 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "Sam Thatch" <st342@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 12:23 +1100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-11 07:34 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2015-11-11 17:24 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-11-11 17:33 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> - 2015-11-11 09:51 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 pechter@pechter.dyndns.org (William Pechter) - 2015-11-12 03:17 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-12 14:04 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Nyssa <Nyssa@flawlesslogic.com> - 2015-11-12 12:24 -0500
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-11-12 17:45 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-13 13:58 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-11-13 15:51 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Nyssa <Nyssa@flawlesslogic.com> - 2015-11-13 14:51 -0500
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 pechter@pechter.dyndns.org (William Pechter) - 2015-11-15 16:44 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-13 18:11 +0000
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 12:37 +1100
Re: [CM] Coding with dad on the Dragon 32 Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2015-11-11 18:32 +0100
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 13:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM00052480CDC79C0E@aca429dc.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #9520 |
Morten Reistad wrote: > In article <PM0005246CA6348F23@aca411e9.ipt.aol.com>, > jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >>William Pechter wrote: >>> In article <PM0005245889FBE0A0@aca40f93.ipt.aol.com>, >>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >>>>Scott Lurndal wrote: >>>>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >>>>>>Scott Lurndal wrote: >>>>>>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>>>>>Both were shit products. VMS got better after the PDP-10 developers >>>>>>>>got hired. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While I agree that DECTape wasn't the brightest idea, >>>>>>> your hatred of the VAX is personal; it was obviously a >>>>>>> great product if you gauge by shipments, revenue and >>>>>>> user testimonials. >>>>>> >>>>>>Can you see the difference between VMS and VAX? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Given that one didn't exist without the other (at least >>>>> until the BSD port), no. >>>> >>>>Ah, I see. You're a customer. On my side of the biz, >>>>they were two very different entities. >>>> >>>>/BAH >>> >>> There were differences between what LCG development was like and what the >>> rest of DEC was like. In the real world VAX wasn't VMS although VMS was >>> VAX. >>> >>> As far as your view on VMS -- it was pretty distorted compared with the >>views >>> of customers in the field. The major colleges and universities which used >>> TOPS-10 and TOPS-20 weren't as pleased since the VAX was more a departmental >>> box than a mainframe. It wasn't designed to support thousands of users. >> >>It's not distorted. 10 and 20 customers were told that VAX/VMS was going >>to replace the PDP-10 business. No choice in the matter. That's what I, >>and a lot of other people, especially including customers, objected to. >>VAX/VMS was fine for a particular niche, but not a viable replacement for >>the work that the PDP-10s did. It was insane for Bell to insist that happen. > [snip] >>Originally, OSF/1 was not supposed to be yet another Unix. JMF was part >>of the original design group and got extrememly despressed when he >>firgured out that the politics had determined that it would be another unix. >>The original goal was to design an OS which had the strengths of all >>the OSes and avoid the problems of those same OSes. > > The OSF/1 designers nevers saw the possibility to have multiple > personalites. These have a bad reputation after the "unix" retrofits > for VMS(Eunice?), Primos (Primix), etc, but if this were designed > in from the start, like AIX paritally has. > > OSF/1 could have been both a multics-like OS and have a unix > top layer, but with some hypervisor-like functions for the extra > functionality that is unknown to the unix api and ui. Just think what the OS could have been with designers who had Unix, TOPS-10, TOPS-20, VMS and PDP-11 and -8 OS experience. If the development process had acquired the Multics' methods, security would not be an afterthought. OSF/1 blew it; not even the project leader could change the minds of the managers who wanted yet another unix. > > QNX has done this, with a "just another unix" interface and a > "real QNX" interface. The interface could have been pluggable so that moving to an OSF/1 system did not require redoing the entire computing of a customer site. > > Well, perhaps some OSF/1 designers did. they did and fought but lost. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "John Jackson" <jj@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-15 04:44 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dapa7uF77h1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #9526 |
"jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message news:PM00052480CDC79C0E@aca429dc.ipt.aol.com... > Morten Reistad wrote: >> In article <PM0005246CA6348F23@aca411e9.ipt.aol.com>, >> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >>>William Pechter wrote: >>>> In article <PM0005245889FBE0A0@aca40f93.ipt.aol.com>, >>>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >>>>>Scott Lurndal wrote: >>>>>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >>>>>>>Scott Lurndal wrote: >>>>>>>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Both were shit products. VMS got better after the PDP-10 >>>>>>>>>developers >>>>>>>>>got hired. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> While I agree that DECTape wasn't the brightest idea, >>>>>>>> your hatred of the VAX is personal; it was obviously a >>>>>>>> great product if you gauge by shipments, revenue and >>>>>>>> user testimonials. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Can you see the difference between VMS and VAX? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Given that one didn't exist without the other (at least >>>>>> until the BSD port), no. >>>>> >>>>>Ah, I see. You're a customer. On my side of the biz, >>>>>they were two very different entities. >>>>> >>>>>/BAH >>>> >>>> There were differences between what LCG development was like and what >>>> the >>>> rest of DEC was like. In the real world VAX wasn't VMS although VMS >>>> was >>>> VAX. >>>> >>>> As far as your view on VMS -- it was pretty distorted compared with the >>>views >>>> of customers in the field. The major colleges and universities which >>>> used >>>> TOPS-10 and TOPS-20 weren't as pleased since the VAX was more a > departmental >>>> box than a mainframe. It wasn't designed to support thousands of >>>> users. >>> >>>It's not distorted. 10 and 20 customers were told that VAX/VMS was going >>>to replace the PDP-10 business. No choice in the matter. That's what I, >>>and a lot of other people, especially including customers, objected to. >>>VAX/VMS was fine for a particular niche, but not a viable replacement for >>>the work that the PDP-10s did. It was insane for Bell to insist that > happen. >> [snip] >>>Originally, OSF/1 was not supposed to be yet another Unix. JMF was part >>>of the original design group and got extrememly despressed when he >>>firgured out that the politics had determined that it would be another >>>unix. >>>The original goal was to design an OS which had the strengths of all >>>the OSes and avoid the problems of those same OSes. >> >> The OSF/1 designers nevers saw the possibility to have multiple >> personalites. These have a bad reputation after the "unix" retrofits >> for VMS(Eunice?), Primos (Primix), etc, but if this were designed >> in from the start, like AIX paritally has. >> >> OSF/1 could have been both a multics-like OS and have a unix >> top layer, but with some hypervisor-like functions for the extra >> functionality that is unknown to the unix api and ui. > > Just think what the OS could have been with designers who had > Unix, TOPS-10, TOPS-20, VMS and PDP-11 and -8 OS experience. Doesn’t necessarily mean that it would have ended up with the best of all of those. There are plenty of situations with OS where its just not possible to have all of the best of the implementations because most things come with downsides and any real design has to decide what pros and cons matter most. For example, sandboxing is an excellent approach for ensuring that rogue apps can't snoop on any data that doesn’t belong to them, but has the massive downside that that means that simple file ops aren't available either. > If the development process had acquired the Multics' > methods, security would not be an afterthought. But that has real downsides with useability. > OSF/1 blew it; not even the project leader could change > the minds of the managers who wanted yet another unix. >> >> QNX has done this, with a "just another unix" interface and a >> "real QNX" interface. > > The interface could have been pluggable so that moving to an > OSF/1 system did not require redoing the entire computing > of a customer site. But pluggable interfaces have their own real downsides. >> Well, perhaps some OSF/1 designers did. > > they did and fought but lost.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 10:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <87d1vc8n1l.fsf@lhwserver.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #9520 |
Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> writes: > The OSF/1 designers nevers saw the possibility to have multiple > personalites. These have a bad reputation after the "unix" retrofits > for VMS(Eunice?), Primos (Primix), etc, but if this were designed > in from the start, like AIX paritally has. > > OSF/1 could have been both a multics-like OS and have a unix > top layer, but with some hypervisor-like functions for the extra > functionality that is unknown to the unix api and ui. > > QNX has done this, with a "just another unix" interface and a > "real QNX" interface. > > Well, perhaps some OSF/1 designers did. the politics I saw was that it was response to AT&T/SUN tieup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_wars While this decision was applauded by customers and the trade press, certain other Unix licensees feared Sun would be unduly advantaged. They formed the Open Software Foundation (OSF) in 1988. The same year, AT&T and another group of licensees responded by forming UNIX International (UI). Technical issues soon took a back seat to vicious and public commercial competition between the two "open" versions of Unix, with X/Open holding the middle ground. A 1990 study of various Unix versions' reliability found that on each version, between a quarter and a third of operating system utilities could be made to crash by fuzzing; the researchers attributed this, in part, to the "race for features, power, and performance" resulting from BSD-System V rivalry, which left developers little time to worry about reliability.[2] .... there was focus on picking up technologies from unix work-alikes ... stuff from UCB (BSD), MIT (x-windows), CMU (MACH, Andrew), UCLA (LOCUS), etc. IBM Palo Alto Science Center had been working with UCB to do port to mainframe 370 ... when they got redirected to do the port to the PC/RT (which came out as AOS, alternative to AIX). They had also been working with UCLA on LOCUS ... and they eventually did ports to both 370 & 386 ... which was released as AIX/370 & AIX/386. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOCUS_%28operating_system%29 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locus_Computing_Corporation -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 10:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <878u608la0.fsf@lhwserver.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #9529 |
more OSF (and other) topic drift & trivia: I remember one OSF meeting where the official DEC rep I knew from the 70s and had been at the science center and vm370 development group. the science center ... some past posts http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#545tech had done (virtual machine) cp67. As the cp67/cms group grew, it split off from the science center (on 4th flr, multics was on 5th flr) and took over the IBM Boston Programming center (on the 3rd flr). As the group expanded ... especially with work on cp67 morph to vm370 ... they moved out to the vacant former SBC bldg in Burlington Mall. During the FS period http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#futuresys lots of groups were directed to refocus on FS stuff and suspend 370 activity. When FS imploded, there was mad rush to get stuff back into the 370 product pipelines. As part of that, the head of POK eventually convinced corporate to kill the vm370 product, shutdown the Burlington Mall group and move everybody to POK to work on MVS/XA (or otherwise MVS/XA wouldn't ship on time some 6-7 years later). They weren't going to tell the VM370 people until the various last minute to minimize the number that could escape the move to POK, however the information managed to leak and some number managed to escape (there was joke that head of POK was one of the largest contributors to DEC VMS, some others showed up at Prime). There was also a witch hunt for the source of the leak ... fortunately for me, nobody gave up the source. -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 14:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <u0m2y.44760$ij2.32078@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #9520 |
Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> writes: >In article <PM0005246CA6348F23@aca411e9.ipt.aol.com>, >jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >>William Pechter wrote: >>> In article <PM0005245889FBE0A0@aca40f93.ipt.aol.com>, >>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >>>>Scott Lurndal wrote: >>>>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >>>>>>Scott Lurndal wrote: >>>>>>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>>>>>Both were shit products. VMS got better after the PDP-10 developers >>>>>>>>got hired. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While I agree that DECTape wasn't the brightest idea, >>>>>>> your hatred of the VAX is personal; it was obviously a >>>>>>> great product if you gauge by shipments, revenue and >>>>>>> user testimonials. >>>>>> >>>>>>Can you see the difference between VMS and VAX? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Given that one didn't exist without the other (at least >>>>> until the BSD port), no. >>>> >>>>Ah, I see. You're a customer. On my side of the biz, >>>>they were two very different entities. >>>> >>>>/BAH >>> >>> There were differences between what LCG development was like and what the >>> rest of DEC was like. In the real world VAX wasn't VMS although VMS was >>> VAX. >>> >>> As far as your view on VMS -- it was pretty distorted compared with the >>views >>> of customers in the field. The major colleges and universities which used >>> TOPS-10 and TOPS-20 weren't as pleased since the VAX was more a departmental >>> box than a mainframe. It wasn't designed to support thousands of users. >> >>It's not distorted. 10 and 20 customers were told that VAX/VMS was going >>to replace the PDP-10 business. No choice in the matter. That's what I, >>and a lot of other people, especially including customers, objected to. >>VAX/VMS was fine for a particular niche, but not a viable replacement for >>the work that the PDP-10s did. It was insane for Bell to insist that happen. >[snip] >>Originally, OSF/1 was not supposed to be yet another Unix. JMF was part >>of the original design group and got extrememly despressed when he >>firgured out that the politics had determined that it would be another unix. >>The original goal was to design an OS which had the strengths of all >>the OSes and avoid the problems of those same OSes. > >The OSF/1 designers nevers saw the possibility to have multiple >personalites. These have a bad reputation after the "unix" retrofits >for VMS(Eunice?), Primos (Primix), etc, but if this were designed >in from the start, like AIX paritally has. > >OSF/1 could have been both a multics-like OS and have a unix >top layer, but with some hypervisor-like functions for the extra >functionality that is unknown to the unix api and ui. > >QNX has done this, with a "just another unix" interface and a >"real QNX" interface. > >Well, perhaps some OSF/1 designers did. At the same time OSF/1 was being designed, the Amadeus[*] project was designing a competitive system based on the Chorus Systemes microkernel. A Unix subsystem was derived from SVR4.2ES/MP to run on the microkernel, but there was nothing to preclude any other subsystem from being implemented - the microkernel was completely agnostic. Amadeus team included Unisys, Chorus, USL, Fujitsu, ICL and a couple others. The Unix subsystem was completely distributed and ran on multiple workstations and high-end MPP systems (e.g. the Unisys OPUS). [*] An EU initiative.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 15:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3d21y.109650$zj3.11125@fx05.iad> |
| In reply to | #9485 |
jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >Scott Lurndal wrote: >> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >>>Scott Lurndal wrote: >>>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> writes: >> >>>>>Both were shit products. VMS got better after the PDP-10 developers >>>>>got hired. >>>> >>>> While I agree that DECTape wasn't the brightest idea, >>>> your hatred of the VAX is personal; it was obviously a >>>> great product if you gauge by shipments, revenue and >>>> user testimonials. >>> >>>Can you see the difference between VMS and VAX? >>> >> >> Given that one didn't exist without the other (at least >> until the BSD port), no. > >Ah, I see. You're a customer. On my side of the biz, >they were two very different entities. Clearly I wasn't a DEC employee. I was, however, an operating system designer for a large mainframe company.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 17:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <muj9hc-j2i.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> |
| In reply to | #9434 |
In article <PM00052430AAEE24F6@aca41c5c.ipt.aol.com>, jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >Bob Eager wrote: >> On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:13:41 +0000, jmfbahciv wrote: >> >>> Morten Reistad wrote: >>>> In article <877flrwsa6.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>, >>>> Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote: >>>>>RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> (That said, I /do/ wish boot times were 0.5 seconds again). >>>>> >>>>>I don't know. Who boots a computer nowadays? >>>> >>>> I do, the ones I develop on. And they are up within a minute, >>>> all of them. With all subsystems like apache, mysql etc. >>>> >>>> The laptops come out of hibernation usually as fast as I can open the >>>> lid, but sometimes there is a ~2s delay, which may be some swapping >>>> taking place. >>>> >>>> The annoying bit is the dhcp stuff for ipv4, which takes around 10 >>>> seconds. ipv6 is up within a second. >>>> >>>> I contrast this with the minis at various PPOEs, which all took around >>>> 30 minutes to come up completely. >>> >>> That's (30 minutes boot-up) is horrid. DEC would consider that a bug. >>> Note that none of the OS developers would wait that long for a restart >>> so they would work on getting a system up quickly. >> >> Never booted VMS off a DECtape II then? :) > >Both were shit products. VMS got better after the PDP-10 developers >got hired. > >IIRC, most of VMS' thrashing at boot time was to figure out which >products were "allowed" to be loaded. IOW, if the site/system >had the proper licenses. Not quite. Even our home-built daemons (in fortran and C, requiring only RMS and the basic OS as libraries) took more than a quarter of an hour to load in a 4M 11/750, assigning 28 async ports and setting up a huge "poll()" on them. Also, the same 28 internally scheduled threads had one file pointer into the same file, an RMS indexed file. That contributed to this taking ages to start. But once it was running it ran pretty fast. (for an 11/750, at least). The very same program on a Prime 50-series took around 2 minutes to start, but needed around 10 minutes worth of preceding segment sharing, so they were both as slow. (on a 550-II). The program in question is the Z00 driver for disseminating stock ticker data in real time; which at that time meant within 100 ms of the actual trade, and with a max skew of 50ms randomly distributed between recipients. We went to great lengths to ensure these criteria, which added around 10 lines of code, but very carefully placed code. The VMS implementation has N workers internally scheduled in a realtime process (because the VMS schedulers stunk); the Primos one had individual phantoms with lots of shared memory, and a large use of the recycl() os call, to give up the rest of the time slice to the next process in line. -- mrr
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 20:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k287hc-rud.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> |
| In reply to | #9427 |
In article <PM0005241C7B957C4D@aca432c8.ipt.aol.com>, jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >Morten Reistad wrote: >> In article <877flrwsa6.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>, >> Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote: >>>RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>: >>> >>>> (That said, I /do/ wish boot times were 0.5 seconds again). >>> >>>I don't know. Who boots a computer nowadays? >> >> I do, the ones I develop on. And they are up within a minute, >> all of them. With all subsystems like apache, mysql etc. >> >> The laptops come out of hibernation usually as fast as I can >> open the lid, but sometimes there is a ~2s delay, which may >> be some swapping taking place. >> >> The annoying bit is the dhcp stuff for ipv4, which takes >> around 10 seconds. ipv6 is up within a second. >> >> I contrast this with the minis at various PPOEs, which >> all took around 30 minutes to come up completely. > >That's (30 minutes boot-up) is horrid. DEC would consider >that a bug. Note that none of the OS developers would >wait that long for a restart so they would work on >getting a system up quickly. Several VAXen are among the set of 30-minute-boots. They were more or less identical to the Primes I got to know so well. One PPOE had a time sheet for this. One minute power sequencing and basic diag from the VCP. 6 minutes vcp loading of microcode into main processor. 3 minute OS load and initialisation. 4 minutes starting disk partitions with roll forward/roll back transactions. 5 minutes sharing code. Then startup of daemons for printers, databases, etc. 12 minutes (really 20, but we opened for logins at the 30 min mark). My laptop does a lot of this startup too. It takes all of 6 seconds to load and initialise the kernel, and a further 12 before all is up and logins can start. Before this there is a 4-5 second bios delay. So, in this respect things have gotten around 100 times better. -- mrr
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hankvc@blackhole.lostwells.org (Hank) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 02:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n1rkad$np8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #9427 |
In article <PM0005241C7B957C4D@aca432c8.ipt.aol.com>, jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >Morten Reistad wrote: >> In article <877flrwsa6.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>, >> Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote: >>>RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>: >>> >>>> (That said, I /do/ wish boot times were 0.5 seconds again). >>> >>>I don't know. Who boots a computer nowadays? >> >> I do, the ones I develop on. And they are up within a minute, >> all of them. With all subsystems like apache, mysql etc. >> >> The laptops come out of hibernation usually as fast as I can >> open the lid, but sometimes there is a ~2s delay, which may >> be some swapping taking place. >> >> The annoying bit is the dhcp stuff for ipv4, which takes >> around 10 seconds. ipv6 is up within a second. >> >> I contrast this with the minis at various PPOEs, which >> all took around 30 minutes to come up completely. > >That's (30 minutes boot-up) is horrid. DEC would consider >that a bug. Note that none of the OS developers would >wait that long for a restart so they would work on >getting a system up quickly. > >/BAH Oh? May I acquaint you with the boot up time on a Microvax II running Ultrix? Hank
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 14:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM00052430A10344C8@aca41c5c.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #9433 |
Hank wrote: > In article <PM0005241C7B957C4D@aca432c8.ipt.aol.com>, > jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >>Morten Reistad wrote: >>> In article <877flrwsa6.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>, >>> Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote: >>>>RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>: >>>> >>>>> (That said, I /do/ wish boot times were 0.5 seconds again). >>>> >>>>I don't know. Who boots a computer nowadays? >>> >>> I do, the ones I develop on. And they are up within a minute, >>> all of them. With all subsystems like apache, mysql etc. >>> >>> The laptops come out of hibernation usually as fast as I can >>> open the lid, but sometimes there is a ~2s delay, which may >>> be some swapping taking place. >>> >>> The annoying bit is the dhcp stuff for ipv4, which takes >>> around 10 seconds. ipv6 is up within a second. >>> >>> I contrast this with the minis at various PPOEs, which >>> all took around 30 minutes to come up completely. >> >>That's (30 minutes boot-up) is horrid. DEC would consider >>that a bug. Note that none of the OS developers would >>wait that long for a restart so they would work on >>getting a system up quickly. >> >>/BAH > > Oh? May I acquaint you with the boot up time on a Microvax II running > Ultrix? I never did one of those. Both products happened after DEC became Digital ;-). Did it really take that long? I'm surprised any "old" customer bought the product. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 14:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM0005241C72B624CC@aca432c8.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #9423 |
Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>: > >> (That said, I /do/ wish boot times were 0.5 seconds again). > > I don't know. Who boots a computer nowadays? I do. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 05:31 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dac74sFrb6gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #9428 |
"jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message news:PM0005241C72B624CC@aca432c8.ipt.aol.com... > Marko Rauhamaa wrote: >> RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>: >> >>> (That said, I /do/ wish boot times were 0.5 seconds again). >> >> I don't know. Who boots a computer nowadays? > > I do. Yeah, but you have always been a fucking dinosaur and are actually stupid enough to run down to the library to look something up when everyone else uses this funky system called the net that has been available for quite some time now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 14:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM000524309B41BCAE@aca41c5c.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #9431 |
Rod Speed wrote: > > > "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message > news:PM0005241C72B624CC@aca432c8.ipt.aol.com... >> Marko Rauhamaa wrote: >>> RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>: >>> >>>> (That said, I /do/ wish boot times were 0.5 seconds again). >>> >>> I don't know. Who boots a computer nowadays? >> >> I do. > > Yeah, but you have always been a fucking dinosaur Which makes me an excellent field test site. > and are actually stupid enough to run down to the > library to look something up when everyone else > uses this funky system called the net that has been > available for quite some time now. > Which keeps me from spending more than $1200/year. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 18:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nok9hc-j2i.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> |
| In reply to | #9437 |
In article <PM000524309B41BCAE@aca41c5c.ipt.aol.com>, jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote: >Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >> news:PM0005241C72B624CC@aca432c8.ipt.aol.com... >>> Marko Rauhamaa wrote: >>>> RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>: >>>> >>>>> (That said, I /do/ wish boot times were 0.5 seconds again). >>>> >>>> I don't know. Who boots a computer nowadays? >>> >>> I do. >> >> Yeah, but you have always been a fucking dinosaur > >Which makes me an excellent field test site. > >> and are actually stupid enough to run down to the >> library to look something up when everyone else >> uses this funky system called the net that has been >> available for quite some time now. >> >Which keeps me from spending more than $1200/year. Eh? I live in a not-too-cheap-at-all Internet country. We (in .no) pay typically a third more for our Internet than people in .se or .dk. I went for fiber in the "new" house, with a gigabit up/downlink, and pay for a CIR of 50, NOK 449/month. Or NOK 5388/year. Which is almost exactly $600/year. In addition I pay around $40 for some dyndns and secondary mail/dns servers, so I can access the home from anywhere in the world via a VPN. Or via ipv6; i have a /56 assigned. (2001:16d8:ee00:8100::/56) I have servers permanenty on as firewall, fiber modem etc, and the power meter says it uses 78 watts in semi-idle. The fiber modem uses 18 alone, and the mandatory access box another 22. So, add another $78 to cover the electricity. I run everything on 12V, and have two large boat batteries of 120Ah as UPS. Which should give me a day and a half to fire up a generator. Yes, the power stability around here is very bad right now, living within 200 meters of two large residential developments of >200 units each; having them mess with the 21kV network almost daily. This is the total of what I pay, and I get orders of magnitude better Internet connectivity than what you have, for a little more than half the cost. And there are nothing metered except the electricity. I really have "an internet of things" here, now I have 30 ipv4 and 22 ipv6 addresses assigned. Two of these are for my tops20/klh10 "virtual machines" . -- mrr
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 10:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20151111105218.11f857ab074958716a223643@eircom.net> |
| In reply to | #9441 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:05:59 +0100 Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> wrote: > I went for fiber in the "new" house, with a gigabit up/downlink, > and pay for a CIR of 50, NOK 449/month. Or NOK 5388/year. Which > is almost exactly $600/year. Hmm over 500 Euro a year for 6Mb down 1Mb up here, we *might* get fibre before the 2020s but I doubt it. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 11:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Xx4mYlXIlyQWFwiP@jasper.org.uk> |
| In reply to | #9460 |
En el artículo <20151111105218.11f857ab074958716a223643@eircom.net>,
Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> escribió:
> Hmm over 500 Euro a year for 6Mb down 1Mb up here
Ouch.
>, we *might* get
>fibre before the 2020s but I doubt it.
No FTTC?
I thought Eircom was one of the more clued-up telecoms providers.
--
(\_/)
(='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke!
(")_(")
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 14:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20151111140147.b783e79d1b0817c0c89f62ee@eircom.net> |
| In reply to | #9462 |
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:40:56 +0000 Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> wrote: > En el artículo <20151111105218.11f857ab074958716a223643@eircom.net>, > Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> escribió: > > > Hmm over 500 Euro a year for 6Mb down 1Mb up here > > Ouch. The joys of rural Ireland. Although to be fair I am looking at an alternative service which offers 20Mb down 5Mb up for about 20% more. > >, we *might* get > >fibre before the 2020s but I doubt it. > > No FTTC? Not even a C to put the F in - as this place got near to being ready to move in we took up an offer for a landline phone and 24Mb DSL feed for a good price and free installation. Engineer turned up and noticed lack of pole (we had told them) and called in an order for poles. Eircom engineer turns up a few days later works out where to hook us up and marks locations for two poles. Time passes, more time passes, yet more time passes, even m... ah you get the idea. After several months of "it'll be next week for sure" we told them where to stick their poles should they ever find them and went with a fixed wireless service which was up and running in less than two weeks. > I thought Eircom was one of the more clued-up telecoms providers. There's great service in (some parts) of the major cities, OTOH if you live in a cul-de-sac a couple of miles outside of a medium sized village some 20 minutes drive from the nearest largish town then it's not so great - in fact if you live in a new build in such a place it can be essentially non existent. Should I hear about fibre turning up round here I will start round two of getting poles, probably direct with Eircon in the (faint) hope that they fill their own orders more effectively. Back when they were Telecom Eireann I used to call them Telecon Airhead, I'm not sure they've improved. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 06:25 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <daeum5Fi06dU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #9437 |
jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote >>> Marko Rauhamaa wrote >>>> RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>: >>>>> (That said, I /do/ wish boot times were 0.5 seconds again). >>>> I don't know. Who boots a computer nowadays? >>> I do. >> Yeah, but you have always been a fucking dinosaur > Which makes me an excellent field test site. Like hell it does when on one with even half a clue operates like you do anymore. >> and are actually stupid enough to run down to >> the library to look something up when everyone >> else uses this funky system called the net that >> has been available for quite some time now. > Which keeps me from spending more than $1200/year. Doesn’t cost anything even remotely like that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 23:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <GXu0y.123070$mn4.55497@fx42.am4> |
| In reply to | #9445 |
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 06:25:54 +1100, Rod Speed wrote: > jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote >> Rod Speed wrote >>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote >>>> Marko Rauhamaa wrote >>>>> RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>: > >>>>>> (That said, I /do/ wish boot times were 0.5 seconds again). > >>>>> I don't know. Who boots a computer nowadays? > >>>> I do. > >>> Yeah, but you have always been a fucking dinosaur > >> Which makes me an excellent field test site. > > Like hell it does when on one with even half a clue operates like you do > anymore. > >>> and are actually stupid enough to run down to the library to look >>> something up when everyone else uses this funky system called the net >>> that has been available for quite some time now. > >> Which keeps me from spending more than $1200/year. > > Doesn’t cost anything even remotely like that. Well, that's three *actual* posts that I've seen from this troll. I'm used to seeing ghost sightings of him in others postings in the other NGs he trolls but I rather suspect I'll not be seeing many such ghosts once I've killfiled him in this NG. -- Johnny B Good
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sam Thatch" <st342@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 12:23 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dafjkbFn43dU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #9451 |
"Johnny B Good" <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:GXu0y.123070$mn4.55497@fx42.am4... > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 06:25:54 +1100, Rod Speed wrote: > >> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote >>> Rod Speed wrote >>>> jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> wrote >>>>> Marko Rauhamaa wrote >>>>>> RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>: >> >>>>>>> (That said, I /do/ wish boot times were 0.5 seconds again). >> >>>>>> I don't know. Who boots a computer nowadays? >> >>>>> I do. >> >>>> Yeah, but you have always been a fucking dinosaur >> >>> Which makes me an excellent field test site. >> >> Like hell it does when on one with even half a clue operates like you do >> anymore. >> >>>> and are actually stupid enough to run down to the library to look >>>> something up when everyone else uses this funky system called the net >>>> that has been available for quite some time now. >> >>> Which keeps me from spending more than $1200/year. >> >> Doesn’t cost anything even remotely like that. > > Well, that's three *actual* posts that I've seen from this troll. I'm > used to seeing ghost sightings of him in others postings in the other NGs > he trolls but I rather suspect I'll not be seeing many such ghosts once > I've killfiled him in this NG. No one actually gives a flying red fuck what you do or do not read.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.misc
csiph-web