Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | BartC <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Damned Windows Bloat |
| Date | 2016-10-21 20:46 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nudram$8dn$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <nu8tp1$amf$1@dont-email.me> <nubcdc$rfb$1@dont-email.me> <nubsqh$6ms$1@solani.org> <nud2lk$ahp$1@dont-email.me> <877f91ehtj.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> |
On 21/10/2016 18:24, Mike Spencer wrote: > BartC <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > >> So is allowing uncapped cache sizes by programs like Firefox. Now, this >> machine has an uncapped size but the total cache is only 65MB. My other >> machine is also uncapped but it's reached nearly 200,000MB despite being >> rarely used. > > Clinging, as I do, to the trailing edge of web tech, I haven't seen > this. But one moderny browser feature of which I have heard comes to > mind as a potential resources hog: browser prefetch. > > Do late-model versions of Firefox parse a rendered page and > immediately begin to fetch the data referenced by all URLs on that > page? If so, does it cache them? If so, when, if ever, is that cache > purged? I've no idea how it works, what it does or what is actually inside those files. But once I'd cleared the cache, I started Firefox. All it did was go to the homepage (google), and that immediately generated 60 cache files (1MB total). Then I went to youtube. Now I'm at 160 files. In short, within a matter of minutes of doing very little, it had generated 400 files of nearly 20MB. There appears to be no mechanism to ever delete a file unless a cap is imposed (which it has now - 20MB). Yet the same Firefox doesn't appear to that on another machine, also uncapped. It's a mystery. > Is it possible that gigs of data you've never asked for, let alone > seen, are lurking on HD? Yes, that's exactly the point of my posts. In a matter of days I've recovered 300GB of space (that would entirely fill 60,000 of those early 5MB drives I mentioned - probably a whole month's production from the Far East). And 190GB of that took 17 hours to delete. -- Bartc
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Damned Windows Bloat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-12 18:16 +1000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-12 10:50 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-12 20:21 +1000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2016-09-17 14:12 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-17 17:06 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-09-17 15:30 -0300
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-09-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-09-17 21:47 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-09-17 22:06 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-09-17 23:02 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2016-09-18 08:45 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-09-18 09:06 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-09-18 14:54 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2016-09-18 17:45 +0200
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-09-18 17:07 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-09-18 17:20 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-09-18 17:21 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-09-18 17:19 -0300
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-09-18 23:38 +0300
Re: Damned Windows Bloat The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 17:49 -0700
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2016-09-18 22:26 +0200
Re: Damned Windows Bloat The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 13:29 -0700
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-09-18 22:34 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2016-09-18 18:45 +0200
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2016-10-02 11:54 +0000
[OT] light Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2016-10-01 14:48 +0000
Re: [OT] light Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2016-10-02 13:39 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 10:12 -0700
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-09-18 17:15 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 12:54 -0700
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-09-18 22:47 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-09-18 17:24 -0300
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-09-18 23:01 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-09-18 00:42 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-17 23:30 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-09-12 10:35 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-09-12 10:54 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-12 18:38 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-09-12 19:43 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-13 12:11 +1000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-09-12 21:13 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Johnny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2016-10-02 13:48 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-09-12 10:40 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-12 23:25 +1000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Joe <joecool@ihaveenoughspam.net> - 2016-09-12 21:30 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Batchman <batchman@fastmail.fm> - 2016-09-13 09:37 +1000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Batchman <batchman@fastmail.fm> - 2016-09-13 11:13 +1000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-09-14 08:47 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Batchman <batchman@fastmail.fm> - 2016-09-15 14:45 +1000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-09-16 16:16 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-09-16 16:49 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-09-16 18:44 -0400
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-09-17 09:27 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2016-09-17 11:04 +0200
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-18 19:22 +1000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-09-18 11:58 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-18 21:33 +1000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2016-09-17 11:25 +0200
Re: Damned Windows Bloat polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2016-09-13 07:38 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-13 10:59 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2016-09-13 19:20 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-09-14 13:17 -0400
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-09-14 14:59 -0400
Re: Damned Windows Bloat "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2016-09-15 11:38 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2016-09-15 19:45 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 14:14 -0700
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-09-15 20:20 -0400
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-09-15 11:43 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-09-16 15:41 -0400
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-16 23:56 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-09-16 19:51 -0400
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-17 13:09 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-09-17 10:26 -0400
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-17 14:39 +1000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2016-09-17 11:14 +0200
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Vladimir Vučićević <vladimir@vucicevic.iz.rs> - 2016-09-14 15:21 +0200
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Batchman <batchman@fastmail.fm> - 2016-09-16 14:59 +1000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2016-09-16 11:58 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-10-19 23:57 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-10-20 22:19 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-10-21 01:59 +0000
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-10-21 13:45 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-10-21 14:24 -0300
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-10-21 20:46 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-10-21 22:58 -0400
Re: Damned Windows Bloat Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2016-10-21 21:58 +0200
Re: Damned Windows Bloat bashley@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 14:26 -0700
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-10-22 01:11 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 23:01 -0700
Re: Damned Windows Bloat BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-10-22 11:52 +0100
Re: Damned Windows Bloat The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 20:37 -0700
csiph-web