Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.radio.amateur, rec.radio.amateur.antenna, comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: EMP |
| Date | 2015-11-17 22:26 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <f6mshc-1o2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <44vm4b19ah0qb2e0kiimeklag15rj323qg@4ax.com> <u6eshc-rs1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <1me1udo.1lz5df78kx41iN%roger@hayter.org> <f3jshc-sd2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <159n4blhsbdmlb42vnqr1fh8lg92obitdu@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Rambo <Rambo@thisaintreal.org> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 21:34:07 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>> >>>> In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Rambo <Rambo@thisaintreal.org> wrote: >>>> > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:10:50 +0000, Fred Roberts <foo@bar.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>On 17/11/2015 18:30, gareth wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> Those who were self-taught to the exclusion of sideband and sidetone >>>> >>> are no doubt unaware that in the event of a nuclear detonation that >>>> >>> an EMP will melt the RF amps in their RXs because of the amount of >>>> >>> power that their antennae will pick up? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Anyway, in the light of the events in Paris last Friday, and >>>> >>> previously the attack on the World Trade Centre on 11/9 the costly >>>> >>> and unnecessary nuclear deterrent doesn't seem to be working awfully >>>> >>> well, does it? >>>> >> >>>> >>Well we haven't been nuked yet ;-) >>>> > >>>> > Well the Soviet Nuclear weapon defence threat kept the Americans under >>>> > control for decades. >>>> >>>> As well as the Brits. >>> >>> The UK nuclear weapons are firmly under the control of the Americans >>> anyway, so I don't think we have them for other than ceremonial and >>> solidarity reasons. They're not cheap either. >> >>So if the UK were nuked, there would be no retaliation until the US >>allowed it? >> > The NATO treaty suggests that USA would have to retaliate also. Of course, but that isn't the point. -- Jim Pennino
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
EMP "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-17 18:30 +0000
Re: EMP Fred Roberts <foo@bar.com> - 2015-11-17 19:10 +0000
Re: EMP Rambo <Rambo@thisaintreal.org> - 2015-11-17 19:16 +0000
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-17 20:10 +0000
Re: EMP roger@hayter.org (Roger Hayter) - 2015-11-17 21:03 +0000
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-17 21:34 +0000
Re: EMP Rambo <Rambo@thisaintreal.org> - 2015-11-17 22:06 +0000
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-17 22:26 +0000
Re: EMP roger@hayter.org (Roger Hayter) - 2015-11-18 00:31 +0000
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-18 01:54 +0000
Re: EMP roger@hayter.org (Roger Hayter) - 2015-11-18 00:31 +0000
Re: EMP Brian Reay <no.sp@m.com> - 2015-11-18 01:19 +0000
Re: EMP "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-18 11:23 +0000
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-18 02:07 +0000
Re: EMP Brian Reay <no.sp@m.com> - 2015-11-18 02:39 +0000
Re: EMP Brian Reay <no.sp@m.com> - 2015-11-18 01:19 +0000
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-18 02:09 +0000
Re: EMP Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> - 2015-11-18 09:01 +0000
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-17 20:09 +0000
Re: EMP Stephen Thomas Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2015-11-17 20:40 +0000
Re: EMP "FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI" <g3vKi@turner-smith.uK> - 2015-11-19 00:23 +0000
Re: EMP Brian Reay <no.sp@m.com> - 2015-11-19 00:29 +0000
Re: EMP "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-19 04:40 +0000
Re: EMP "FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI" <g3vKi@turner-smith.uK> - 2015-11-19 20:35 +0000
Re: EMP "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-17 21:02 +0000
Re: EMP "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> - 2015-11-17 13:56 -0800
Re: EMP rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 17:30 -0500
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-17 22:38 +0000
Re: EMP rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 17:53 -0500
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-17 23:12 +0000
Re: EMP rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 23:36 -0500
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-18 06:03 +0000
Re: EMP rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 08:12 -0500
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-18 19:19 +0000
Re: EMP "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> - 2015-11-18 08:13 -0800
Re: EMP rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 11:39 -0500
Re: EMP AndyW <Andy@nojunqmail.com> - 2015-11-18 07:55 +0000
Re: EMP Tom <donotreply@nothere.net> - 2015-11-19 19:12 -0600
Re: EMP jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-20 02:43 +0000
Re: EMP "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2015-11-21 18:54 +0000
csiph-web