Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #2914 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-04-14 23:52 -0500 |
| Last post | 2011-04-14 23:52 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.ruby
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: scope of assignments with lambda Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-14 23:52 -0500
| From | Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-14 23:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: scope of assignments with lambda |
| Message-ID | <b13c6de75276182fdede792abd1045cc@ruby-forum.com> |
7stud -- wrote in post #988797: >> @7stud: Pardon if I wasn't clear in my OP, but I was asking about >> recursion. > My point was that a recursive method seems harder to explain than your > lambda example. As you detailed, your lambda example can be explained > by a closure. Yeah, well, I apologize, but that was my typo. I meant "I *wasn't* asking about recursion". (And no, recursion doesn't seem particularly difficult to explain, does it?!? :) - ff -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.ruby
csiph-web