Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #2914
| From | Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: scope of assignments with lambda |
| Date | 2011-04-14 23:52 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Message-ID | <b13c6de75276182fdede792abd1045cc@ruby-forum.com> (permalink) |
| References | <5ab8b94d707235d7b83c9b011b696ef4@ruby-forum.com> <2b8e0c638f80e0062cbba1f68ca297d8@ruby-forum.com> <470a9e96982d7a927f140193f12c0f64@ruby-forum.com> <a530c7278afb64dd632a5487344cecdf@ruby-forum.com> |
7stud -- wrote in post #988797: >> @7stud: Pardon if I wasn't clear in my OP, but I was asking about >> recursion. > My point was that a recursive method seems harder to explain than your > lambda example. As you detailed, your lambda example can be explained > by a closure. Yeah, well, I apologize, but that was my typo. I meant "I *wasn't* asking about recursion". (And no, recursion doesn't seem particularly difficult to explain, does it?!? :) - ff -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: scope of assignments with lambda Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-14 23:52 -0500
csiph-web